PDA

View Full Version : Ten Things You Need to Know About Fast Track




Brian4Liberty
05-13-2015, 12:09 PM
Ten Things You Need to Know About Fast Track (http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelhammond/2015/04/27/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-fast-track-n1991040/page/full)
Michael Hammond | Apr 27, 2015


One: "Fast Track Authority" Is, At Its Core, Nothing But A Significant Transfer Of Legislative Power To Barack Obama And His Immediate Successor.

It's not exactly like Missouri v. Holland, since, rightly or wrongly, trade agreements have not, constitutionally, been treated as treaties. But it's analogous to Missouri v. Holland in the sense that everything in the agreement will have the force of statutory law. And it will have the force of law even if, under Article I, Section 8, the federal government is not otherwise authorized to legislate in an area. And, under widely established principles of law, it will override any previous statutory law inconsistent with it. And, unlike the Clean Air Act and the National Labor Relations Act, it will come before the courts as a case of first impression, at a time when the courts are packed with Obama nominees with a history of ignoring the black letter of the law and Constitution in order to achieve political objectives.

Two: If Fast Track Is Approved -- And The Agreement Turns Out To Be Horrible -- It Will Be Impossible To Stop It Then.

It will be exactly like the Cromnibus -- a massive take-it-or-leave-it aggregation of baubles and bribes -- with respect to which every politically powerful institution in Washington has some stake in its passage. It cannot be filibustered in the Senate. It cannot be amended in any way. No recent experience with the Senate and House Republican leadership -- be it the government shutdown or the Cromnibus or the Lynch nomination -- suggests that horrified conservatives would have any power to apply the brakes after the TPP or the follow-up agreement with the European Union are made public.

Three: It Is Impossible To Limit The President's Authority In Any Way.

The two principal "limiting" mechanisms on the fast track bill are (1) the statement of negotiating objectives, and (2) the "conditions" on the invocation of fast track. No one, to my knowledge, honestly believes the negotiating objectives will be binding in any way. But the dirty little secret is that the "conditions" are also not worth the paper they're printed on:
...

Four: Fast Track Will Give Both Barack Obama And, Potentially, Hillary Clinton The Ability To Comprehensively Circumvent Congress With Respect To Agreements Which Are Not Even On The Horizon.
...

Five: If Reports Of The Secret Agreement Are Correct, It Contains Language, Patterned After Provisions Applicable To The European Union, Which Would Effectively Mandate Unlimited Amnesty.

According to Curtis Ellis of the American Jobs Alliance, the TPP draft currently contains an entire chapter on immigration. The meaning of this chapter would be deciphered, as a case of first impression, by an American judiciary which is more liberal and politicized than any in history. And it is absolutely clear that it would implicitly repeal any provision of current law that is inconsistent with it.

Is Ellis correct? Well, we don't know, because the provisions of the treaty are being kept secret -- reportedly because they would be very unpopular if anyone knew about them. And, while it's impossible for ordinary Americans to see the negotiating documents, it's nearly as impossible for congressmen being asked to approve fast track to see them. Like ObamaCare, we have to pass it to find out what's in it.

Take into consideration that Mexico is a party to TPP. So a broad EU-like statement about free migration would be taken, at the hands of Obama-packed courts, to be inconsistent with, and therefore to replace any current restrictions on migration and, by inference, naturalization.

Six: The Republican Leadership's "Rah-Rah" Talking Points With Respect To Immigration And TPA Are Deceptive.

A ten-point missive put out by House Speaker John Boehner's press office argues that TPA "specifically bars the president from making any changes to our laws." But this statement, obviously not written by an attorney, has three problems:

First, the TPP will be, by its very definition, the law of the land. It will necessarily supplant any previous statutory law which is inconsistent with it. This is the very nature of a trade agreement. No language in the TPA bill can conceivably change this.
...

Seven: Over The Next Six Years, There Is Ample Time To Insert Firearms Import Bans (With The Force Of Statutory Law) Into The TPP, The EU Agreement, or A Separate Trade Agreement For That Purpose.

Barack Obama has been rabid in his zeal to destroy the Second Amendment community. Over and over again, he has experimented with a wide variety of schemes to ban guns by regulatory fiat: eliminating credit, banning ammunition, compiling a gun registry, encouraging state bans, reclassifying common guns, banning the import of guns, and so forth. And yet, Hatch and Ryan didn't see fit to even purport to prohibit the Obama administration from using a trade agreement to impose a statutory gun import ban.

Eight: Democrats Are Pushing For -- And Obama Will Agree To -- Broad New Environmental And Union Rights Which Will Achieve The Clean Air And Labor Organizing Standards Which Obama Has Failed To Push Through Congress.
...

Nine: The One Thing We Do Know About Fast Track Is That It Will Be A Massive Payout To Obama's Hollywood Funding Base.

The extensive "intellectual property" protections are the one certainty of the TPP. And this one certainty about the TPP is that it will be a gigantic payoff to the California moguls who put Barack Obama in office.

Ten: America Should Be Allowed To See The Entire TPP Before Congress Puts Its "Fast Track Imprimatur" On It.

Surely, this is what John Boehner and congressional Republicans promised us when they committed to transparency. To deliberately conceal a secret agreement, while passing arrangements for its expedited "rubber stamping," represents perfidy which goes far beyond anything that was done with ObamaCare. It was, generally speaking, theoretically possible to read most of ObamaCare prior to passage. TPP is being deliberately hidden.
...
More: http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelhammond/2015/04/27/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-fast-track-n1991040/page/full

Natural Citizen
05-13-2015, 01:27 PM
Well. Heh. I don't know. I'd say there are hundreds of things we need to know about fast track. Of course, that's just me talking. If the author is content with ten then he's content with ten.

All in all, a decent little scribble given the target demographic, I suppose.

tangent4ronpaul
05-13-2015, 03:03 PM
Seven: Over The Next Six Years, There Is Ample Time To Insert Firearms Import Bans (With The Force Of Statutory Law) Into The TPP, The EU Agreement, or A Separate Trade Agreement For That Purpose.

Barack Obama has been rabid in his zeal to destroy the Second Amendment community. Over and over again, he has experimented with a wide variety of schemes to ban guns by regulatory fiat: eliminating credit, banning ammunition, compiling a gun registry, encouraging state bans, reclassifying common guns, banning the import of guns, and so forth. And yet, Hatch and Ryan didn't see fit to even purport to prohibit the Obama administration from using a trade agreement to impose a statutory gun import ban.

Nah, what we need is a firearms/weapons EXPORT ban! No exemptions. That would kill the bill in it's tracks. State, CIA, DoD, MIC, and the fortune 500 would shit a brick! And the world would be a much, much more peaceful place.


Nine: The One Thing We Do Know About Fast Track Is That It Will Be A Massive Payout To Obama's Hollywood Funding Base.

The extensive "intellectual property" protections are the one certainty of the TPP. And this one certainty about the TPP is that it will be a gigantic payoff to the California moguls who put Barack Obama in office.

They alreay got one in the form of DoJ now having a intellectual property division and that becoming one of it's main missions. It would be absolutely horrible for the Internet, though.

-t

Brian4Liberty
05-13-2015, 08:11 PM
They alreay got one in the form of DoJ now having a intellectual property division and that becoming one of it's main missions. It would be absolutely horrible for the Internet, though.

-t

Seem to recall a story about NSA SWAT teams doing copyright raids...

Origanalist
05-13-2015, 08:21 PM
Well. Heh. I don't know. I'd say there are hundreds of things we need to know about fast track. Of course, that's just me talking. If the author is content with ten then he's content with ten.

All in all, a decent little scribble given the target demographic, I suppose.

But we need to pass the bill to see what's in it.