PDA

View Full Version : White House Scrambles After Obama Accused Of Sexism




Brian4Liberty
05-13-2015, 11:03 AM
Isn't it ironic? The cultural Marxists using their usual smear tactics against each other. Then again, purges of their own is where it leads anyway. History repeats itself.

White House Scrambles After Obama Accused Of Sexism (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/13/white-house-scrambles-after-obama-accused-of-sexism/)
by Charlie Spiering - 13 May 2015


Aides at the White House are scrambling to defend President Obama, after critics yesterday suggested that he was exhibiting “sexist” behavior during the ongoing trade battle with liberal champion Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) suggested during a news conference yesterday that Obama was behaving in a sexist manner toward Warren, by criticizing her by using her first name. The president of the National Organization of Women also criticized Obama for sexist behavior because he called Warren by her first name.
...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/13/white-house-scrambles-after-obama-accused-of-sexism/

specsaregood
05-13-2015, 11:05 AM
lmao, saw that coming

enhanced_deficit
05-13-2015, 12:00 PM
No room for sexist haters in DC.

Good to see infighting between two puppets of left-wing neocons as the current puppet show nears its end.


Obama accused of making 'disrespectful' and 'sexist' comments toward Warren

“I think the president was disrespectful to her about the way he did that,” Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, told reporters Tuesday, a few days after Obama referred to Warren, who is a Democrat, as “Elizabeth” and “a politician.” Shortly after that, Senate Democrats successfully blocked the trade bill, which would give the president expanded authority to negotiate a trade pact.
“I think the president has made this more personal than he needed to,” Brown also said, arguing Obama would not have referred to a male senator by his first name.

Obama told Yahoo in a story published Saturday: “The truth of the matter is that Elizabeth is, you know, a politician like everybody else. And you know, she’s got a voice that she wants to get out there. And I understand that.”
O'Neill also said the “subtext” of Obama's comments are “ 'the little lady just doesn't know what she's talking about'. … I think it was disrespectful."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/13/obama-accused-making-disrespectful-and-sexist-comments-toward-warren/

Ronin Truth
05-13-2015, 12:05 PM
I always just love it when the pols devour their own.

Henry Rogue
05-13-2015, 02:05 PM
Yeah, but Warren was being racist, so really, it's a draw.

AuH20
05-13-2015, 02:08 PM
I hope the POTUS responds with the race card and really slaps her around.

ZENemy
05-13-2015, 02:14 PM
hell yea man, this is WAY more important than drone bombing children in parts unknown!

Government 2016! sign me up, they got their shit straight.

mad cow
05-13-2015, 02:35 PM
Yeah, but Warren was being racist, so really, it's a draw.

Yeah,both of them need to check their privilege.

Occam's Banana
05-13-2015, 02:37 PM
But ... but ... that's not possible! Obama had a press conference where he didn't take any questions except from women (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?465211-Watch-President-Obama-Call-on-Female-Reporters-for-Every-Single-Question-During-Friday-s-Press) ...

Zippyjuan
05-13-2015, 03:22 PM
Gee. I did not realize that using somebody's first name could be sexist/ racist. I better watch myself.

Brian4Liberty
05-13-2015, 03:28 PM
What should we call Hillary?

Warrior_of_Freedom
05-13-2015, 03:43 PM
What should we call Hillary?

Wow, okay, looks like someone needs to ban themselves up in here.

Valli6
05-13-2015, 03:43 PM
Yeah, but Warren was being racist, so really, it's a draw.
I'd like to watch them just continue with the catch-all arguments they've always depended on, and try to reach some conclusion.
:toady:
You're sexist!
You're racist!
No! You're sexist!
No! You're racist!
etc.

Warrior_of_Freedom
05-13-2015, 03:44 PM
I'd like to watch them just continue with the catch-all arguments they've always depended on, and try to reach some conclusion.
:toady:
You're sexist!
You're racist!
No! You're sexist!
No! You're racist!
etc.
"You're stupid!"
"You're an idiot!"
"No, you're stupid!"

Zippyjuan
05-13-2015, 03:44 PM
What should we call Hillary?

"Sir"?

Brian4Liberty
05-13-2015, 03:57 PM
"Sir"?

Maybe "Her Excellency"? Or is that reserved for Netanyahu?

How about "Her Majesty"?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzb5QABCmak

enhanced_deficit
05-14-2015, 01:52 PM
What should we call Hillary?

What difference does it make.

BV2
05-14-2015, 01:56 PM
No room for sexist haters in DC.

Good to see infighting between two puppets of left-wing neocons as the current puppet show nears its end.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/13/obama-accused-making-disrespectful-and-sexist-comments-toward-warren/

Said show doesn't end, just the beginning of another act.

William Tell
05-14-2015, 02:07 PM
What should we call Hillary?

Monica's ex-boyfriend's wife?

ThePaleoLibertarian
05-14-2015, 02:59 PM
This is the problem with prog narratives; eventually those putting them forward will be eaten by the same beast they helped create. Maybe that's not a problem, maybe it's just the survival of the memetically fit.

Cleaner44
05-14-2015, 04:18 PM
Yeah, but Warren was being racist, so really, it's a draw.

Not true... it was the white half of Obama that criticized Warren.

euphemia
05-14-2015, 04:39 PM
Once again, thought crimes trump real crimes!