PDA

View Full Version : Breaking: Boston bomber found guilty of conspiracy to use weapon of mass destruction




donnay
04-08-2015, 12:34 PM
Boston bomber found guilty of conspiracy to use weapon of mass destruction


By Reuters and Dailymail.com Reporter

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been found guilty of using a weapon of mass-destruction to kill three young people at the 2013 Boston marathon.

The 21-year-old was emotionless with his arms folded as the verdict, which was reached after nearly 12 hours of deliberations, was read out in U.S. District Court in Boston on Wednesday.

He had faced a sprawling 30-count indictment, with 17 of the charges carrying the death penalty. The verdicts to all counts are still be read.

The guilty charge means he is eligible for the death penalty. The same jury will decide whether to sentence him to death or life in prison without possibility of parole.

Two women, 23-year-old Lingzi Lu and 29-year-old Krystle Campbell, and eight-year-old boy Martin Richard were killed - and 16 others were seriously wounded - when the two homemade pressure-cooker bombs exploded at the marathon in April 2013.

As Tsarnaev and his brother sought to elude authorities in the days after the bombings, they also shot MIT Police Officer Sean Collier dead.

During closing arguments on Monday, Tsarnaev's lawyers agreed with prosecutors that their client had conspired with his older brother, Tamerlan, to plant and detonate the bombs at the event.

Continued... (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3030519/Boston-bombing-jury-finds-Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-guilty.html)

Ronin Truth
04-08-2015, 12:37 PM
DUH, his lawyer freely admitted his guilt in his opening statement. How much did this farce cost?

muh_roads
04-08-2015, 12:38 PM
Is the FBI also guilty for being part of the conspiracy by communicating with the older brother for years prior?

Aspie Minarcho-Capitalist
04-08-2015, 02:27 PM
I wonder how much the derisory abundance of all these subsidized rulings, inquiries and interrogations etcetera have costed the taxpayer. I couldn't care less for this loser anyway and I hope he will get what's coming to him as I personally believe in the death penalty.

thoughtomator
04-08-2015, 02:33 PM
I wonder how much the derisory abundance of all these subsidized rulings, inquiries and interrogations etcetera have costed the taxpayer. I couldn't care less for this loser anyway and I hope he will get what's coming to him as I personally believe in the death penalty.

You don't seriously believe he did it, do you?

Aspie Minarcho-Capitalist
04-08-2015, 02:50 PM
You don't seriously believe he did it, do you?

I reject the preconceived notions of the bombings being a "false flag," same goes for the Sandy Hook "Hoax" (I am not calling for ANY gun control whatsoever of course).

donnay
04-08-2015, 03:00 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-vjPw8QZV0


Alastair Stevenson is a veteran marathon runner who has competed in dozens of marathons around the world, including the London Marathon. He’s very familiar with the security typically found at marathons, and he immediately noticed something odd about the Boston marathon security.

“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill,” he was quoted as saying byLocal15TV.com.

In the interview, you’ll hear Stevenson say:

“At the start at the event, at the Athlete’s Village, there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village at the start. There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn’t be concerned and that it was just a drill. And maybe it was just a drill, but I’ve never seen anything like that — not at any marathon that I’ve ever been to. You know, that just concerned me that that’s the only race that I’ve seen in my life where they had dogs sniffing for explosions, and that’s the only place where there had been explosions.”

roho76
04-08-2015, 07:54 PM
"Conspiracy to use"??? I don't get it. Whether or not "this is the guy and or this is a false flag", someone has got to be guilty of using a weapon of mass destruction and if not this guy then who? Seems pretty cut and dry on the governments behalf. Why the "conspiracy to blah blah blah?" :rolleyes:

angelatc
04-08-2015, 08:21 PM
"Conspiracy to use"??? I don't get it. Whether or not "this is the guy and or this is a false flag", someone has got to be guilty of using a weapon of mass destruction and if not this guy then who? Seems pretty cut and dry on the governments behalf. Why the "conspiracy to blah blah blah?" :rolleyes:

The headline doesn't match the text. The text says he was found guilty of using the weapon, and that he had conspired with his brother.

ClydeCoulter
04-08-2015, 09:37 PM
You don't seriously believe he did it, do you?

Of course, because he bought milk right afterwards...tell tale sign...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utsofhPqj2A

[edit: Damn, what's up with the forum inserting a youtube inccorectly?
n/m 7th time is the charm!]

Weston White
04-09-2015, 01:30 AM
I reject the preconceived notions of the bombings being a "false flag," same goes for the Sandy Hook "Hoax" (I am not calling for ANY gun control whatsoever of course).

...And you are not concerned why all those black hat, black jacketed, and khaki pants wearing Craft members running around that day are not also on trial for conspiracy and treason? You do not question how that 90-pound neo-maxi-zoom-dweebie managed to run around with half his weight in equipment while expertly speed firing at living targets or that the government immediately razed the crime scene and the bank his mother’s home?

“We didn’t do it” “We give Up!”



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m92LALKy0Q

Spikender
04-09-2015, 01:44 AM
"Weapon of mass destruction".

Yeah, okay. I guess there really were WMDs in the Middle East if the bombs used are considered WMDs.

I hope one day the people really behind this whole shenanigan are hanging from telephone poles. I'll keep telling the truth until then.

PRB
04-09-2015, 01:57 AM
DUH, his lawyer freely admitted his guilt in his opening statement. How much did this farce cost?

he used his lawyer, his fault. nobody's keeping him from hiring a better lawyer.

PRB
04-09-2015, 01:58 AM
"Weapon of mass destruction".

Yeah, okay. I guess there really were WMDs in the Middle East if the bombs used are considered WMDs.

I hope one day the people really behind this whole shenanigan are hanging from telephone poles. I'll keep telling the truth until then.

Too bad even Bush couldn't think of this joke to back up his claim.

Spikender
04-09-2015, 02:12 AM
he used his lawyer, his fault. nobody's keeping him from hiring a better lawyer.

Seeing as how the dude has practically been a vegetable as of late, I don't think lawyering up was really on his mind.


Too bad even Bush couldn't think of this joke to back up his claim.

His handlers could have come up with one. I love jokes, but his administration was the worst one I've ever heard.

Weston White
04-09-2015, 03:38 AM
Patsies, a dime a dozen:


https://i2.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/06/article-2184658-144AA12F000005DC-540_468x286.jpg

otherone
04-09-2015, 06:23 AM
Why was there a trial if he entered a guilty plea?

ClydeCoulter
04-09-2015, 06:32 AM
Of course, because he bought milk right afterwards...tell tale sign...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utsofhPqj2A

[edit: Damn, what's up with the forum inserting a youtube inccorectly?
n/m 7th time is the charm!]

WTF? This is getting old and tiresome.

Video removed!

What's that about not having nice things?

Edit: Here's another copy from Boston Globe


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Loziq3j84Nc

libertarianMoney
04-09-2015, 08:28 AM
This horrifies me.

Really... With the average person you can't even ask questions about this without risking being labeled crazy. I think I was asking about the exact number of people that got hurt. Then someone acted horrified that I was being insensitive. (Naturally, I exploded at them about their insensitivity towards the people that died in the middle east that same day. Not my proudest moment.)

That being said, every time I heard Boston Strong, all I could think was Boston Annoying. If strength is defined by how many people can die in a bombing without chaos then Bostonians are nothing compared to Palestine or something. I would think that strength would be not letting your values get clouded by an instant of horror. Strength would be saying, these kids deserve a fair trial (and ideally, not to get shot.) Strength would be taking account of the media hanging them before they were even found. Strength would be refusing illegal searches to your house. Strength would be giving those boys a fair trial (did they do that? I don't know but I certainly don't trust government saying they did.)

I certainly didn't see any strength from Boston as shown by the media at least.

Perhaps I am insensitive though.