Police encounters kill hundreds of disabled Americans every year, ACLU argues

[Natural Citizen]

I know that there is a previous thread around here some place with regard to this thing. I don't know where it is, though. This is just an update but contains a wealth of relevant data with regard to the whole of the phenomenon.




The American Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief arguing that hundreds of disabled Americans are killed in police encounters every year. It was filed in support of a mentally ill woman suing police for shooting her five times.

In the case of San Francisco v. Sheehan, Teresa Sheehan argued that police shot her five times even though she was experiencing a “psychiatric emergency.” The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case on Monday.

The ACLU argues that “many of these deaths and injuries are needless, the tragic result of police failing to use well-established and effective law enforcement practices that take disability into account.”

The group said that shootings of the mentally ill tend to follow a pattern. Someone calls the police about a person in crisis, the police arrive but the person in crisis fails to immediately respond to police commands because they are in a crisis related to their mental disability. When they don't comply with police commands, an officer starts shouting and draws their weapon. They may surround the person or spray them with mace, escalating the confrontation. In panic, the mentally ill person grabs a nearby object, like a knife, screwdriver, pen or mop. The officer generally fires and the disabled person dies or is injured.



Continued - Police encounters kill hundreds of disabled Americans every year, ACLU argues (http://rt.com/usa/242769-aclu-police-shootings-disabled-americans/)

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Someone calls the police about a person in crisis,...


Don't call the police !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




I know it should be common knowledge, but it can't be emphasized enough.

[Ronin Truth]

That's just how fascists do things. It's call thinning and improving the flock.

[mrsat_98]

That's just how fascists do things. It's call thinning and improving the flock.

Willie Lynch covered this quite well.

[enhanced_deficit]

Sad mark for global leader in freedom spreading.

[Christopher A. Brown]

I know that there is a previous thread around here some place with regard to this thing. I don't know where it is, though. This is just an update but contains a wealth of relevant data with regard to the whole of the phenomena.


Here's the final phenomena.

I'm going to tell you exactly what's happening and because you will immediately dissociate due to historically unreasonable social fears you have assimilated unconsciously all of your life, you will do nothing no matter how much you would like to stop seeing these murders happening.

The phenomena you post about exists because psychology is forbidden from working directly with the unconscious mind, meaning effective mental health cannot exist in our society which is controlled by conditioning imposed due to unreasonable fears originating with religion.

Since the fears are unconscious for our society generally, not even courts will allow proof of the efficacy and potentials for working direct with the unconscious mind because the courts are extensions of a Roman society.

http://algoxy.com/law

Since courts are of the highest levels of society, those same levels having immense economic power over media and will not allow mass access to the information because that would defeat the dissociative process Roman mores mandate.

A reporter at my local newspaper was given a copy of a lawsuit working to get federal courts to compel a county with its mental health department to follow state health and safety codes mandating the municipality work with the public to develop investigational or experimental treatment. (CHS 1370.4)

http://algoxy.com/law/no_free_press/sbsecretsofmedia.html

Within two weeks she was fired, then sixteen others were fired or resigned, they were all gagged by the court. The competing paper in town would not do the story either.

So what was a phenomena is now a tragedy, and I haven't even told everything which qualifies because I'm hoping the dissociative mechanism might not be triggered too heavily by this approach.

[phill4paul]

<snip>

I'm sensing some cognitive infiltration.

[Christopher A. Brown]

I'm sensing some cognitive infiltration.

Would a cognitive infiltrator disclose their knowledge of treason to the us district court?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreassign.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreasign1.html

Which causes judges to conceal treason in violation of us code?

No, a covert agent would never do that. However, one might post as you have, particularly in response to a post with such proof of corruption and abridging of the freedom of the press.

[phill4paul]

Would a cognitive infiltrator disclose their knowledge of treason to the us district court?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreassign.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreasign1.html

Which causes judges to conceal treason in violation of us code?

No, a covert agent would never do that. However, one might post as you have, particularly in response to a post with such proof of corruption and abridging of the freedom of the press.

They must be InSiNcEre AmErIcAnS.

[Christopher A. Brown]

Would a cognitive infiltrator disclose their knowledge of treason to the us district court?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreassign.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreasign1.html

Which causes judges to conceal treason in violation of us code?

No, a covert agent would never do that. However, one might post as you have, particularly in response to a post with such proof of corruption and abridging of the freedom of the press.

They must be InSiNcEre AmErIcAnS.

Worse than that, they are treasonous.

Do you accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?

This thread is really about my original post in it. And that post shows massive deprivation of rights by courts in a lawsuit aimed at getting government to provide effective mental health care. It also shows collusion between newspaper owners and municipalities protecting unconstitutional courts from exposure, to be sure the public doesn't learn about the lawsuit.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?471198-Police-encounters-kill-hundreds-of-disabled-Americans-every-year-ACLU-argues&p=5818590&viewfull=1#post5818590

Why are you working to impede effective mental health care?

[BV2]

as they should.

[puppetmaster]

One a side note.....so many people on disability...what a POS program. Half of the degenerate customers I sell to in my store have qualified in some way.

[idiom]

This was in Better Call Saul recently.

Looming inevitability of a mentally ill man being tazed by police was epic. You could see the police had no procedural alternative, and didn't even want one.

Decent television. Showed the police as anonymous thugs who happily brutalise the most innocent and helpless of citizens.

[Christopher A. Brown]

They must be InSiNcEre AmErIcAnS.


Do you accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?


Can you accept what is logical and reasonably derived from the framing documents, what is prime constitutional intent?

Show you are a sincere, intelligent and patriotic American.

[Christopher A. Brown]

They must be InSiNcEre AmErIcAnS.

Do you accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?

Unaccountability suggests insincerity, but what kind is the question here. We have a number of possibilities.

1). Confusion or ignorance creating social fear.

2). Partisan conditioning which cannot stand up to reasoning.

3). Conditioning from online society controlled by covert agents conducting cognitive infiltration of social activist groups.

4). Covert agent, cognitive infiltrator. Agreement with unifying factor forbidden. Against agenda.

[CPUd]

What happened to the root purpose of free speech being to insure the information vital to survival be shared and understood?

[Christopher A. Brown]

What happened to the root purpose of free speech being to insure the information vital to survival be shared and understood?

Its still exactly where it was, but it is the biological, natural law definition.

The new definition is simply keyed into the Declaration of Independence which is based on natural law. The definition is becoming more correct, more lawful, more worthy of our recognizing it as prime constitutional defense and unifying around it.

The unity is more based in restoring the ultimate purpose of free speech, ONCE we recognize what it is.

[heavenlyboy34]

Would a cognitive infiltrator disclose their knowledge of treason to the us district court?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreassign.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreasign1.html

Which causes judges to conceal treason in violation of us code?

No, a covert agent would never do that. However, one might post as you have, particularly in response to a post with such proof of corruption and abridging of the freedom of the press.

Neither would a True Scotsman! ;)

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman

[heavenlyboy34]

One a side note.....so many people on disability...what a POS program. Half of the degenerate customers I sell to in my store have qualified in some way.

Ya heartless bastard. Reported.

[Christopher A. Brown]

Neither would a True Scotsman! ;)

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman

Your link is not relative because it has no reasoning associated with what sincere Americans would do with evidence of treason OR the ultimate purpose of free speech. Or the fact that law enforcement is killing mentally ill people while courts deny justice to prevent effective mental health care.

A sincere American (who also has social courage) confronted with the evidence I've posted, would be suggesting ways to get justice and disclose treason effectively to protect all Americans.

They would be posting their recognition and acceptance for the obvious purpose of free speech.

[Christopher A. Brown]

They must be InSiNcEre AmErIcAnS.

It appears you may be insincere, there is only one test.

Do you accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?

It really is a simple question that many children could answer correctly.