PDA

View Full Version : Congress threatens DC over pot law




Suzanimal
02-25-2015, 03:10 PM
Congress threatens DC over pot law


Congressional Republicans are making a last-ditch effort to stop the District of Columbia from decriminalizing private recreational use of marijuana from going into effect Thursday, threatening the mayor and her staff with fines and jail time.

In a letter [PDF] sent late Tuesday to DC’s newly-inaugurated Democrat mayor, Muriel Bowser, Reps. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Mark Meadows (R-NC) warned the District government that enacting Initiative 71 would be “contrary to law.” The two representatives, majority members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, also demanded the District turn over extensive documentation on any employees involved with the Initiative by March 10, with the implicit threat of fines and jail time for violating federal law.

DC officials and their backers in Congress have pointed out the December 2014 appropriations bill cited by Chaffetz and Meadows, cannot stop laws already enacted. The language in the final bill said the District could not “enact” any law to regulate or legalize marijuana, rather than “enact or carry out,” pointed the District’s Delegate in the House of Representatives, Eleanor Holmes-Norton.

In a statement on Tuesday, Norton argued that the DC bill could only be blocked by a Resolution of Disapproval passed within the 30-day review period – and no such resolution was passed.

“If the Republican Congress, which can’t decide how to keep open… the Department of Homeland Security, wants to pick a fight with the District over our local marijuana reform law,” Norton said in a statement, “a fight is what they will get.”

It was government crackdown that eventually led to Initiative 71. DC Cannabis Campaign organizer Adam Eidinger turned to activism in 2012 after DC police raided two locations of Capitol Hemp – owned by Eidinger and his business partner, Alan Amsterdam – arresting six employees and seizing $350,000 worth of merchandise. Threatened with prosecution over alleged drug violations, Eidinger and Amsterdam shut down the business.

According to the announcement by DC Mayor Muriel Bowser earlier this week, adults aged 21 and older will be able to lawfully possess up to two ounces of marijuana and use it on private property. They will also be allowed to transfer up to one ounce of marijuana to another person, “as long as no money, goods or services are exchanged and the recipient is 21 years of age or older,” and grow upward of six plants a piece.

Bowser has described the principle as “home grown, home use.” Anything else remains illegal, including “selling any amount of marijuana, impaired driving and consuming any amount of marijuana in public."

http://rt.com/usa/235531-dc-marijuana-legalization-mayor/

Ronin Truth
02-25-2015, 03:24 PM
Is that a variation on 'panarchy'?

Cabal
02-25-2015, 03:30 PM
Feds threatening locals through the barrel of a gun over cannabis.


Well done, Congress. :rolleyes:

Lucille
02-25-2015, 03:34 PM
Fair-weather federalist drunkard nannies don't want anyone getting high on teh pot.

So Congress Drinks on the Job? Who Knew?
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/09/30/so-congress-drinks-on-the-job-who-knew/


“I understand there’s a few people who smoke marijuana already,” said Paul, laughing. “And, how many times have you seen someone arrested for driving under the influence of marijuana? I mean, I’ve never heard of it! Driving under the influence of alcohol … That is dangerous.”

Paul attributed current laws to a widespread fear of political retribution in Congress, among many members who “drink a lot of alcohol” at that.

“Are you saying that there are a lot of alcoholics in Congress?” asked guest host Joy Behar.

Paul backpedaled. “I said there’s a lot of people in Congress who drink a lot of alcohol.”

“They won’t vote to legalize it,” he added with a laugh.

Ronin Truth
02-25-2015, 03:37 PM
Fair-weather federalist drunkard nannies don't want anyone getting high on teh pot.

So Congress Drinks on the Job? Who Knew?
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/09/30/so-congress-drinks-on-the-job-who-knew/


"By their fruits, ye shall know them."

Brett85
02-25-2015, 04:20 PM
And many in the liberty movement used to think that Chaffetz was decent.

dannno
02-25-2015, 04:40 PM
And many in the liberty movement used to think that Chaffetz was decent.

Heh, yep.. Guilty.. I didn't ever think he was 100% pro-liberty but it is sad to see him 100% off on some important issues.

JK/SEA
02-25-2015, 04:55 PM
And many in the liberty movement used to think that Chaffetz was decent.

just proves that 'chicken shit' chaffetz is a lying bastard.

Suzanimal
02-26-2015, 09:19 AM
Pot now legal in D.C. despite threats from Congress


Despite warnings from congressional Republicans, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser allowed D.C.'s marijuana legalization law to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, told Bowser that if she continued with her plan to implement marijuana legalization she would face "very serious consequences," The Washington Post reported.

"You can go to prison for this," The Post quoted Chaffetz as saying. "We're not playing a little game here."

Bowser was undeterred by the threat of prison time. "We are acting lawfully," she told reporters. "I have a lot of things to do, being in jail wouldn't be a good thing."

Rep. Andy Harris, D-Md., who has been one of the most vocal opponents of marijuana legalization in D.C., says implementation of the law would be a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act, which prohibits the spending of federal funds that have not been appropriated.

"The Anti-Deficiency Act doesn't say everybody except the mayor," Harris said, according to The Hill. "The Anti-Deficiency Act is clear. It has two years' jail time and loss of a job, as well as penalties."

Nearly two thirds of D.C. voters approved Initiative 71 in November. Under Initiative 71, people ages 21 or older will be allowed to possess two ounces or less of marijuana, use marijuana on private property and give one ounce or less to another person as long as no money, goods or services are exchanged.

Residents will also be permitted to cultivate up to six marijuana plants — although no more than three mature plants— in their primary home.

Congress has final say over the laws in the District of Columbia, and the two sides disagree about whether Congress acted quickly enough to block an initiative legalizing pot.

Congress passed legislation in December that aimed to block Initiative 71 by banning the use of appropriated funds to "enact any law, rule, or regulation to legalize" marijuana.

District officials argue that the law was enacted when voters approved the initiative in November and that it merely takes effect Thursday. Chaffetz disagrees with that interpretation and says the mayor and other District employees who move forward with legalization could face criminal penalties.

Chaffetz and Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., sent Bowser a letter Tuesday "strongly urging" her to reconsider implementing marijuana legalization. They argue D.C. bills do not become law and are not enacted until the 30-day review period called for in the Home Rule Act has expired.

According to City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, "The initiative was enacted at the point that the voters voted and the board certified the results," The Post reported. "I sent the initiative to Congress for the required congressional review as required by law. This is not a matter that I had a choice about. The legal opinions are consistent."

The letter from Chaffetz and Meadows says if money is spent to change the D.C. law it would violate the Anti-Deficiency Act. To that end, the Oversight Committee has begun an investigation and demanded the District turn over all documents that would reveal how much time and money city employees have spent on the marijuana legalization law.

No one has ever been convicted of violating the Anti-Deficiency Act, although government employees have been punished administratively for violations.

Jamie Raskin, a constitutional law professor at American University, characterized the threat of criminal prosecution as "a lot of huffing and puffing on Capitol Hill."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/25/dc-marijuana-legalization/24033803/

Root
02-26-2015, 09:59 AM
Great, now I have a good reason to visit DC. :cool: Is anyone familiar enough with this bill/law to know if it allows retail stores or is the free (black) market still the only source?

jmdrake
02-26-2015, 10:10 AM
And many in the liberty movement used to think that Chaffetz was decent.

Wow. Sorely disappointed. Why is he even choosing this hill to die on? Can we primary him?

jmdrake
02-26-2015, 10:12 AM
Pot now legal in D.C. despite threats from Congress



Rep. Andy Harris, D-Md., who has been one of the most vocal opponents of marijuana legalization in D.C., says implementation of the law would be a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act, which prohibits the spending of federal funds that have not been appropriated.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/25/dc-marijuana-legalization/24033803/

I don't get it. How is not prosecuting people for simple marijuana possession spending federal funds? Wouldn't that save money?