PDA

View Full Version : Report: Rise in ‘lone wolf’ domestic terrorists remains ‘substantial threat’




Suzanimal
02-13-2015, 08:22 AM
Report: Rise in ‘lone wolf’ domestic terrorists remains ‘substantial threat’


As U.S. officials scramble to suppress the pace of foreign fighters flocking to join extremists in Syria and Iraq, a national watchdog group is imploring the federal government not to overlook terrorist threats at home.

According to a study released Thursday by the Southern Poverty Law Center — a nonprofit organization that tracks hate activity — on average, a terrorist attack or foiled encounter took place every 34 days in the United States from April 1, 2009, through Feb. 1, 2015.

“We are not in any way trying to diminish the very real jihadist threat,” said Mark Potok, SLPC senior fellow and editor of the report. “But we have known since Timothy McVeigh murdered 168 people in Oklahoma City in 1995 that there is a very real and very substantial threat in terms of terrorism from our fellow Americans.”

The study, which included violence by people who identified with radical-right ideologies, as well as homegrown jihadists, identified 63 incidents — attacks, foiled plots and 14 unplanned situations, such as traffic stops, where extremists were confronted by police and reacted with major violence. In six years, 63 victims of terrorist attacks were killed, scores injured and 16 assailants died.

Among the attacks: an IRS manager killed in 2010, when a man who had attended a radical anti-tax group meeting crashed his single-engine plane into an Austin, Texas, tax office; the 2012 mass shooting at a Wisconsin Sikh temple by a longtime neo-Nazi; and a couple with anti-government views fatally shooting two police officers and a bystander in Las Vegas last summer.

The White House will host a summit next week on countering violent extremism, stating in a press release that the efforts are “made even more imperative in light of recent, tragic attacks in Ottawa, Sydney, and Paris.”

“While the Summit will address contemporary challenges, it will not focus on any particular religion, ideology, or political movement and will, instead, seek to draw lessons that are applicable to the full spectrum of violent extremists,” spokesman Ned Price said in an email to Yahoo News. “The Summit will include discussions of opportunities for prevention and intervention at the local level, recognizing the importance of communities — whether at home or overseas.”

Potok said the White House summit sounds all-encompassing on paper, but that history has proven otherwise.

“We’re concerned that this meeting may very well end up focusing too heavily on the threat of Islamist terrorism,” he said. “The government, at least in our view, has at least fallen down in many ways … with respect to dealing with domestic terrorism.”

The 43-year-old civil rights organization is not immune to its own controversy. Conservative politicians and others have long questioned the criteria for placement on the group's hate list. This week the SPLC issued a public apology to Dr. Ben Carson — a potential 2016 presidential candidate — for lumping him in with the likes of KKK members. He has since been removed from their "Extremist File.”

In 2009, a team of Department of Homeland Security analysts tried to issue a confidential report to law enforcement agencies on how the economic crisis and the election of the first black president were fueling rightwing extremism. But political backlash over the report forced then-DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to renounce her team’s findings.

“The report was remarkably accurate in its analysis and warnings (which included the assertion that the threat of lone wolves and small cells was growing),” the SPLC authors write in their report.

Of the terrorist incidents since April 2009, the study found that 74 percent were carried out, or planned, by a single person. Ninety percent of the more than 60 attacks were the work of no more than two people — a couple, two brothers, a pair of friends and a father and son among them.

“People are increasingly, it seems, getting away from groups and are essentially hiding themselves in the anonymity and safety of the Internet,” Potok said.

In the wake of last month’s rampage at offices of the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, Attorney General Eric Holder admitted on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that small-scale attacks in the United States were a possibility.

“It's something that frankly keeps me up at night. Worrying about the lone wolf or a group of people, a very small group of people, who decide to get arms on their own and do what we saw in France,” Holder said. “It’s the kind of thing that our government is focused on doing all that we can, in conjunction with our state and local counterparts, to try to make sure that it does not happen.”

This week’s fatal shooting of three American-born Muslim college students by a middle-aged white man near the University of North Carolina has not been ruled a hate crime. Police say their preliminary investigation indicates that a dispute over a parking space sparked the violence, but the deaths were condemned by civil liberties groups and created allegations of anti-Muslim bias on Twitter.

“We certainly hope that the three victims in Chapel Hill were not the victims of Islamic-phobic violence, but it certainly seems possible,” Potok said. “And if not them, then I think sadly we can look forward to more of that violence.”

Asked if “ISIS a true indication of what Islam looks like when it controls a society,” about half of 1,000 U.S. Protestant pastors agreed, according to poll results released this week by LifeWay Research.

Those kinds of numbers are troubling to Potok, who worries that recent world events could motivate some extremists to act.

“Muslims in this country are clearly under fire, and it is very likely to get worse before it gets better,” he said.

Following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the Department of Justice formed a task force dedicated to domestic terrorism. That committee disbanded not long after 9/11, but Holder announced last summer that the group was being revived.

“It had held no meetings, however, as of press time,” the SPLC writes in its report.

Before the Oklahoma City bombing, only four people were reportedly aware it was being planned. Daryl Johnson, the former security analyst who led the 2009 DHS study, warns that the trend in "lone wolf" extremism is ominous.

“We’re long overdue for a much greater attack from the far right,” Johnson told the SPLC.Boogity Boogity



http://news.yahoo.com/watchdog-report-rise-of-lone-wolf-domestic-terrorists-is-dangerous-situation-002912201.html

DamianTV
02-13-2015, 08:36 AM
No longer just ordinary fed up citizens, but Terrorists. The war has always been on us.

Boogity Boogity.

jbauer
02-13-2015, 08:54 AM
So do these "lone wolves" ride around with a big orange flag (like the "slow" people who ride 3 wheel bikes) identifying them as lone wolves?

There isn't enough money, time or intelligence thats going to pinpoint when someone decides they're going to go shoot 'em up at the mall. This is just a big ploy to use even more resources toward government controlling everything we do in our lives.

Natural Citizen
02-13-2015, 09:11 AM
So do these "lone wolves" ride around with a big orange flag..


Some sport black robes, patriotic lapel pins and a 3 piece wall street smile. Screw it. Someone has to say it.

tod evans
02-13-2015, 09:34 AM
Just a little bit more freedom and everyone will be safe.......

donnay
02-13-2015, 10:07 AM
These lone terrorist seem to be cops--all over the country. I vote to shut 'em down!

ZENemy
02-13-2015, 10:42 AM
Its going to be "too late" soon. I know we are close now, but pretty soon, its going to be REALLY too late.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB


Suppressing internal dissent
Monument to victims of KGB / NKVD operations in Vilnius, Lithuania.

During the Cold War, the KGB actively sought to combat "ideological subversion"—anti-communist political and religious ideas and the dissidents who promoted them, which was generally dealt with as a matter of national security in discouraging influence of hostile foreign powers.

After denouncing Stalinism in his secret speech On the Personality Cult and its Consequences in 1956, head of state Nikita Khrushchev lessened suppression of "ideological subversion". As a result, critical literature re-emerged, including the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich (1962), by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who was code-named PAUK ("spider") by the KGB. After Khrushchev's deposition in 1964, Leonid Brezhnev reverted the State and KGB to actively harsh suppression; house searches to seize documents and the continual monitoring of dissidents became routine again. To wit, in 1965, such a search-and-seizure operation yielded Solzhenitsyn manuscripts of "slanderous fabrications", and the subversion trial of the novelists Andrei Sinyavsky and Yuli Daniel; Sinyavsky (alias "Abram Tertz"), and Daniel (alias "Nikolai Arzhak"), were captured after a Moscow literary-world informant told KGB when to find them at home.[19]

In 1967, the campaign of this suppression increased under new KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov. After suppressing the Prague Spring, KGB Chairman Andropov established the Fifth Directorate to monitor dissension and eliminate dissenters. He was especially concerned with Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Andrei Sakharov, "Public Enemy Number One".[20] Andropov failed to expel Solzhenitsyn before 1974; but did internally exile Sakharov to Gorky in 1980. The KGB failed to prevent Sakharov's collecting his Nobel Peace Prize in 1975, but did prevent Yuri Orlov collecting his Nobel Prize in 1978; Chairman Andropov supervised both operations.

KGB dissident-group infiltration featured agents provocateur pretending "sympathy to the cause", smear campaigns against prominent dissidents, and show trials; once imprisoned, the dissident endured KGB interrogators and sympathetic informant cell-mates. In the event, Mikhail Gorbachev's glasnost policies lessened persecution of dissidents; he was effecting some of the policy changes they had been demanding since the 1970s.[21]







Motherfuckers need to wake up.

enhanced_deficit
02-13-2015, 08:45 PM
Are they profiled to be of darker skin shades ?




http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/azz1.jpg

UWDude
02-14-2015, 01:28 AM
Another chapter in UWDude's analytics of propaganda:

Look closely. the term, "lone wolf", what does it invoke to a young male loner?

When the government is chastising, it is calling violent attackers "cowards", "terrorists", "extremists".

But when it is warning of attacks, it is using a romantic notion, "the lone wolf"

Think about it.

Why would the government use a word that would sound like a badge of honor to a socially outcast young male, whilst the other terms it uses are detestable to almost anyone?





















Because they want these attacks to happen. It gives them an excuse to crack down, while the casualties are usually low, and only worthless civilians anyway. They are trying to trigger social outcasts into violence.

muh_roads
02-14-2015, 02:27 AM
Are they profiled to be of darker skin shades ?




http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/azz1.jpg

I feel like a terrible person for never following this. Do you have a video proving this or an article?

Bastiat's The Law
02-14-2015, 02:35 AM
That's what happens when you allow people in from cultures that don't have a love of liberty.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
02-14-2015, 03:08 AM
Wonder how many people will actually bother to read the SPLC "study." First of all, they never define was constitutes an event. They use subjective and imprecise words like "likely" and "seemed" to evaluate an event. Some of these events also came from their own database.

Yahoo claims a "rise" of the wolf, but the actual "study" does not. In fact, the study reads, "...it appears that the rate of killing has remained approximately the same throughout." Their rise is actually only four events, but then they, themselves, discount the increase:


found that violence from the extreme right between 2000 and 2011 had surpassed that of the 1990s by a factor of four, but many experts agree that that seems exaggerated.

They then pull out their crystal ball and report that all this craziness shows no let up:



What is certain is that domestic terrorism from all sources is endemic and shows no signs of abating.

DamianTV
02-14-2015, 03:55 AM
Another chapter in UWDude's analytics of propaganda:

Look closely. the term, "lone wolf", what does it invoke to a young male loner?

When the government is chastising, it is calling violent attackers "cowards", "terrorists", "extremists".

But when it is warning of attacks, it is using a romantic notion, "the lone wolf"

Think about it.

Why would the government use a word that would sound like a badge of honor to a socially outcast young male, whilst the other terms it uses are detestable to almost anyone?





















Because they want these attacks to happen. It gives them an excuse to crack down, while the casualties are usually low, and only worthless civilians anyway. They are trying to trigger social outcasts into violence.

+Rep