DamianTV
01-15-2015, 06:24 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-15/british-government-wants-outlaw-secure-communication-keep-you-safe
Well at least someone finally had the candor to just come out and say it.
In the wake of recent terror attacks in Europe, British Prime Minister David Cameron has called for an end to secure communications technology.
In other words, he wants to ensure that you will never again be able to use encryption technology to maintain privacy.
Nothing should be safe from government’s prying eyes. Nothing.
This is the same sad cycle repeating itself yet again: something terrible happens, and government reacts by awarding themselves even more power and taking away even more freedom.
Prime Minister Cameron’s remarks came in a press conference in which he stated:
“The simple principle is this: do we want to allow a means of communications between people which, even in extremis, with a signed warrant from the home secretary personally, that we cannot read?”
“And my answer to that is, no, we must not. The first duty of any government is to keep out country and our people safe. . . The powers that I believe we need, whether on communications data or on the content of communications, I’m very comfortable that those are absolutely right for a modern, liberal democracy.”
...
NSA already does this, but they simply beat around the bush, interpreting the 4th Amendment vs National Security and long winded legalese the same way that math can technically prove that 0.9999 is exactly equal to 1, and other garbage interpretations.
Without Privacy, your every action is subject to the Judgement of everyone.
Employers claim the Right to completely monitor you, in your home, as it is "part of what you agreed to". We can fire you for ANY reason. Such as eating too much Bacon, or failure to exercise as dictated, or brushing your teeth, taking your meds, listening to daily Propoganda, having children, being Jewish, literally ANYTHING. Employers will claim flat out Human Ownership. But Employers are not the only ones pulling your strings, it is one of many yanking hard on your leashes. Imagine for a moment that the most corrupt Medical Insurnace Corporation in existence were to have written the Ten Commandments. They would all be rephrased versions of the exact same thing, Obedience.
- Thou shall not engage in any activities we deem to be Unsafe
- Thou shall not attempt to defraud by making false medical claims for profit
- Thou shall not speak ill of those that provide for you
The list will be extended so on and so forth until every decision you make that determines the course of your life is subject to approval. It has nothing to do with Right and Wrong. Right and Wrong are Subjective. When Privacy is completely eliminated, everything you do will quite literally be Wrong in someones eyes, somewhere. If you go to Church, there will be a group of people that think you are going to the Wrong Church. If you think someone else is going to the Wrong Church, you will also have the opportunity to make your voice known. No matter what you do, you will be in the Wrong. This is intentional. This destroys your Identy that you create for yourself and replaces it with the Imposed Artificial Identity. You are not your name, you are number X7Z56AR23-CA7735. You are what society tells you that you are. Standard Group Think Psychology.
The big problem is that Privacy is eliminated in order to crush dissent. In Nazi Germany, the Jews were the ones that were at the greatest risk of having their Religious Privacy violated. And it cost them their lives. Being Jewish in and of itself is neither Right nor Wrong, and it is NOT subject to my approval or disapproval. Being Jewish is not a Crime. Nor is having a reasonable level of Distrust. Mark my words, there WILL be another Hollocaust. This 21st Century Hollocaust will not be against the Jews again; it WILL be used to execute and end the lives of any who "wake up" and even begin to question the Status Quo. Because you and I are a part of this, you and I are both on their shit list. Me for having written it, and you for having read more than the first few lines. You are here because you have the wisdom to question the nature of the Status Quo, everything else between you and I is completely superfluous, everything that we agree and disagree on.
The End of Privacy is the End of Freedom
Modern Slavery is quite different from ancient Slavery. Directly imposed slavery, where one human is used to physically harm another human for disobedience is quite expensive and does not yeild high levels of productivity. Slavery has become more advanced since very very ancient times. It was discovered that if Slaves believed they were free, their productivity increased, which benefitted those in power. Control is a two step reaction in Slavery. Impose physical harm on to an individual so that their minds choose to obey instead of enduring further punishments inflicted. The reason this is inefficient is because the body is used as an intermediary to control the minds. It is much more efficient to control the mind of the slaves directly. Mind Control is not impossible, and it is not limited to Brainwashing, Cults, or Clockwork Orange Programming. Mind Control is simply to control all the information your brain has access to. Once that information is presented in a certan context, where by conclusions are already made, your reaction is controlled because the reaction provokes an expected response. You can be provided any information, and as long as a conclusion is a part of that information, you wont try to draw any conclusions for yourself.
By completely eliminating Privacy, your Thoughts become subject to the approval of your owners. Our Constitution prohibits the ownership of another human being, but what if you only owned a PART of that individual, namely the mind? Since you arent physically trying to control the individual, it is considered that Ownership of the Subjects Mind is NOT Slavery. Example: Public School. Another example: Religion. I am not going to try to debate whether there is or is not a God. What I do want to emphasize is that Religion can be a means of control, and is just as vunerable to infiltration as any other thought process that takes place in the human mind. It isnt even against Religion, but against using Religion as an Extension of Control. You dont get to have detailed conversations with the Real God, or talk to Jesus in person, face to face. Someone else does this for you. And this is the "Security Hole". Someone else gets to tell you who and what God is and what he has said. To control the Word of God is to control God. Actual control over God is not possible, and everyone on both sides should agree on this. What is possible is to fully control a human perception of God, and that is done by having another human control what your perceptions are.
The important part of controlling Religion is that it affects EVERYTHING. Belief. Belief is one of Three Pillars of Control. Belief is also not about God, but also about Legitimacy of Authority. A good way to put this is that our money is a Fiat Currency, and what gives these pieces of paper its value is our Belief that it has value. If that Belief can be controlled, then the person can be controlled as well. Another form of Belief that is not Religious would be Information. The glass is on the table. It doesnt matter if the glass is on the table or not, most people dont bother to verify the information. You can be controlled as long as you have a Belief in what you are told. You are told that the glass is on the table, thus, you are supposed to Believe the glass is on the table. The glass may or may not in fact actually be on the table. The target is your mind, and your mind is shaped by what you Believe to be true. The means of gathering this information can be altered in so many ways that it is ridiculus. Say you are the one that put the glass on the table. You tell leave the room and tell someone else that the glass is on the table. The outcome could be altered. While you did put the glass on the table, there is a small window of opportunity for that glass to be removed from the table and twist your actions to make your expression of your actions no longer truthful. If you are unaware that the glass has been removed from the table, your statement of "the glass is on the table" becomes false. Now, replace "glass on the table" with Terrorists, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Conspiracy Therory, and every possible conclusion that the human mind can ever possibly dream up, literally every single thought. It can all be completely false. An intermediary goal on the road to total mental enslavement is to control your Belief in the function of the State. Again, nothing to do with God, Muhammed, Buddha, Jesus, etc. Belief is about shaping your mind. They need you to Believe that their Authority is Legitimate. And even if you do not, as long as you Believe that some harm may befall you, you will not rise up against those that control you through what you Believe in.
Privacy matters because it is the window of opportunity to control your Mind through your Perceptions. Once your Mind is completely controlled, you are completely controlled, and are thus, Enslaved to the dominant will of others who now manipulate your every action to service their desires and agendas. My only Blog on this site explains that without Privacy, Revolution is impossible. Ending Privacy is an absolute goal of the Dictators because it not only controls all of humanity at this very moment, but controls all of humanity until the end of eternity.
Technology has damn near enabled this to become possible, which is why Encryption is necessary to both Privacy and Freedom.
Well at least someone finally had the candor to just come out and say it.
In the wake of recent terror attacks in Europe, British Prime Minister David Cameron has called for an end to secure communications technology.
In other words, he wants to ensure that you will never again be able to use encryption technology to maintain privacy.
Nothing should be safe from government’s prying eyes. Nothing.
This is the same sad cycle repeating itself yet again: something terrible happens, and government reacts by awarding themselves even more power and taking away even more freedom.
Prime Minister Cameron’s remarks came in a press conference in which he stated:
“The simple principle is this: do we want to allow a means of communications between people which, even in extremis, with a signed warrant from the home secretary personally, that we cannot read?”
“And my answer to that is, no, we must not. The first duty of any government is to keep out country and our people safe. . . The powers that I believe we need, whether on communications data or on the content of communications, I’m very comfortable that those are absolutely right for a modern, liberal democracy.”
...
NSA already does this, but they simply beat around the bush, interpreting the 4th Amendment vs National Security and long winded legalese the same way that math can technically prove that 0.9999 is exactly equal to 1, and other garbage interpretations.
Without Privacy, your every action is subject to the Judgement of everyone.
Employers claim the Right to completely monitor you, in your home, as it is "part of what you agreed to". We can fire you for ANY reason. Such as eating too much Bacon, or failure to exercise as dictated, or brushing your teeth, taking your meds, listening to daily Propoganda, having children, being Jewish, literally ANYTHING. Employers will claim flat out Human Ownership. But Employers are not the only ones pulling your strings, it is one of many yanking hard on your leashes. Imagine for a moment that the most corrupt Medical Insurnace Corporation in existence were to have written the Ten Commandments. They would all be rephrased versions of the exact same thing, Obedience.
- Thou shall not engage in any activities we deem to be Unsafe
- Thou shall not attempt to defraud by making false medical claims for profit
- Thou shall not speak ill of those that provide for you
The list will be extended so on and so forth until every decision you make that determines the course of your life is subject to approval. It has nothing to do with Right and Wrong. Right and Wrong are Subjective. When Privacy is completely eliminated, everything you do will quite literally be Wrong in someones eyes, somewhere. If you go to Church, there will be a group of people that think you are going to the Wrong Church. If you think someone else is going to the Wrong Church, you will also have the opportunity to make your voice known. No matter what you do, you will be in the Wrong. This is intentional. This destroys your Identy that you create for yourself and replaces it with the Imposed Artificial Identity. You are not your name, you are number X7Z56AR23-CA7735. You are what society tells you that you are. Standard Group Think Psychology.
The big problem is that Privacy is eliminated in order to crush dissent. In Nazi Germany, the Jews were the ones that were at the greatest risk of having their Religious Privacy violated. And it cost them their lives. Being Jewish in and of itself is neither Right nor Wrong, and it is NOT subject to my approval or disapproval. Being Jewish is not a Crime. Nor is having a reasonable level of Distrust. Mark my words, there WILL be another Hollocaust. This 21st Century Hollocaust will not be against the Jews again; it WILL be used to execute and end the lives of any who "wake up" and even begin to question the Status Quo. Because you and I are a part of this, you and I are both on their shit list. Me for having written it, and you for having read more than the first few lines. You are here because you have the wisdom to question the nature of the Status Quo, everything else between you and I is completely superfluous, everything that we agree and disagree on.
The End of Privacy is the End of Freedom
Modern Slavery is quite different from ancient Slavery. Directly imposed slavery, where one human is used to physically harm another human for disobedience is quite expensive and does not yeild high levels of productivity. Slavery has become more advanced since very very ancient times. It was discovered that if Slaves believed they were free, their productivity increased, which benefitted those in power. Control is a two step reaction in Slavery. Impose physical harm on to an individual so that their minds choose to obey instead of enduring further punishments inflicted. The reason this is inefficient is because the body is used as an intermediary to control the minds. It is much more efficient to control the mind of the slaves directly. Mind Control is not impossible, and it is not limited to Brainwashing, Cults, or Clockwork Orange Programming. Mind Control is simply to control all the information your brain has access to. Once that information is presented in a certan context, where by conclusions are already made, your reaction is controlled because the reaction provokes an expected response. You can be provided any information, and as long as a conclusion is a part of that information, you wont try to draw any conclusions for yourself.
By completely eliminating Privacy, your Thoughts become subject to the approval of your owners. Our Constitution prohibits the ownership of another human being, but what if you only owned a PART of that individual, namely the mind? Since you arent physically trying to control the individual, it is considered that Ownership of the Subjects Mind is NOT Slavery. Example: Public School. Another example: Religion. I am not going to try to debate whether there is or is not a God. What I do want to emphasize is that Religion can be a means of control, and is just as vunerable to infiltration as any other thought process that takes place in the human mind. It isnt even against Religion, but against using Religion as an Extension of Control. You dont get to have detailed conversations with the Real God, or talk to Jesus in person, face to face. Someone else does this for you. And this is the "Security Hole". Someone else gets to tell you who and what God is and what he has said. To control the Word of God is to control God. Actual control over God is not possible, and everyone on both sides should agree on this. What is possible is to fully control a human perception of God, and that is done by having another human control what your perceptions are.
The important part of controlling Religion is that it affects EVERYTHING. Belief. Belief is one of Three Pillars of Control. Belief is also not about God, but also about Legitimacy of Authority. A good way to put this is that our money is a Fiat Currency, and what gives these pieces of paper its value is our Belief that it has value. If that Belief can be controlled, then the person can be controlled as well. Another form of Belief that is not Religious would be Information. The glass is on the table. It doesnt matter if the glass is on the table or not, most people dont bother to verify the information. You can be controlled as long as you have a Belief in what you are told. You are told that the glass is on the table, thus, you are supposed to Believe the glass is on the table. The glass may or may not in fact actually be on the table. The target is your mind, and your mind is shaped by what you Believe to be true. The means of gathering this information can be altered in so many ways that it is ridiculus. Say you are the one that put the glass on the table. You tell leave the room and tell someone else that the glass is on the table. The outcome could be altered. While you did put the glass on the table, there is a small window of opportunity for that glass to be removed from the table and twist your actions to make your expression of your actions no longer truthful. If you are unaware that the glass has been removed from the table, your statement of "the glass is on the table" becomes false. Now, replace "glass on the table" with Terrorists, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Conspiracy Therory, and every possible conclusion that the human mind can ever possibly dream up, literally every single thought. It can all be completely false. An intermediary goal on the road to total mental enslavement is to control your Belief in the function of the State. Again, nothing to do with God, Muhammed, Buddha, Jesus, etc. Belief is about shaping your mind. They need you to Believe that their Authority is Legitimate. And even if you do not, as long as you Believe that some harm may befall you, you will not rise up against those that control you through what you Believe in.
Privacy matters because it is the window of opportunity to control your Mind through your Perceptions. Once your Mind is completely controlled, you are completely controlled, and are thus, Enslaved to the dominant will of others who now manipulate your every action to service their desires and agendas. My only Blog on this site explains that without Privacy, Revolution is impossible. Ending Privacy is an absolute goal of the Dictators because it not only controls all of humanity at this very moment, but controls all of humanity until the end of eternity.
Technology has damn near enabled this to become possible, which is why Encryption is necessary to both Privacy and Freedom.