PDA

View Full Version : The bravest Senator




Brian4Liberty
01-13-2015, 03:03 PM
Agree with him or not, Senator Sessions has no problem taking on the most powerful special interests in the nation. This is a Senator that is not constrained by catering to donors and other bountiful lobbyists. The US Chamber of Commerce, Wall St, La Raza, various billionaires, Unions, Democrats, socialists, Marxists, bring them all on at once: Sessions is the bravest Senator in Washington.

http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/67ae7163-6616-4023-a5c4-534c53e6fc26/immigration-primer-for-the-114th-congress.pdf

Jeff Sessions Pens 25-Page Roadmap for New Republican Majority (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/12/jeff-sessions-defines-republican-position-on-immigration-in-25-page-roadmap-document/)
by Matthew Boyle - 12 Jan 2015


Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is explaining what he thinks the Republican Party position on immigration should be in a 25-page document delivered to all Republican members of Congress and all their key staffers on Capitol Hill.
...
“‘Immigration reform’ may be the single most abused phrase in the English language. It has become a legislative honorific almost exclusively reserved for proposals which benefit everyone but actual American citizens,” Sessions writes in the introduction.

"Consider the recent Obama-backed “immigration reform” bill rejected by Congress. That bill—the culmination of a $1.5 billion lobbying effort—doubled the influx of foreign workers to benefit corporate lobbyists, offered sweeping amnesty to benefit illegal immigrants, and collapsed enforcement to benefit groups in the Democrat political machine that advocate open borders. But for American citizens, the legislation offered nothing except lower wages, higher unemployment, and a heavier tax burden."

Sessions explains it is an “incoherent question” to assert that anyone who opposes the particular policies in the “Gang of Eight” immigration bill—whether done in a comprehensive bill, or in piecemeal fashion—is against “immigration reform” in general.

“Nobody says opponents of tax hikes oppose ‘tax reform,’ or that opponents of cap-and-trade oppose ‘energy reform,’” Sessions writes, before providing one particular answer Republicans could give when asked that trap question about what their “immigration reform” position happens to be:

"I am opposed to any immigration policy which makes it harder for the unemployed to find jobs and easier for employers to keep pay low. If by “immigration reform,” you mean helping the unemployed return to the workforce, limiting work visas so wages can rise, and establishing firm control over entry and exit in the United States, then I am for it. Which do you mean?"

Democrats, Sessions notes, have already answered that question—aligning themselves entirely with special interests instead of the American people.
...
Instead of competing for special interests’ support, and support from illegal aliens, Sessions said Republicans should compete for support from the hundreds of millions of Americans who have been ignored by career politicians—especially Democrats—in the immigration debate.

“The largest untapped constituency in American politics are the 300 million American citizens who have been completely left out of the immigration debate,” Sessions said. “Speak to that constituency—with clarity and compassion—and change the issue forever.”

Sessions writes that Republicans lost the 2012 presidential election because, according to exit polls, voters believed the GOP was “out of touch with the concerns of most people in the United States today.”
...
Sessions points to recent jobs statistics from Obama’s own Department of Labor.

Bureau of Labor Statistics data, he writes, shows that “all net employment gains since the recession have gone to foreign workers while 1.5 million fewer U.S.-born Americans hold jobs today than did then—despite the total population of U.S.-born adults increasing by 11 million over that same time.”

Sessions questions, however, why those facts from BLS are “revealed” in plain sight.

"On no issue is there a greater separation between the everyday citizen and the political elite than on the issue of immigration. For decades, the American people have begged and pleaded for a just and lawful system of immigration that serves their interests—but their demands are refused. For years, Americans have been scorned and mocked by the elite denizens of Washington and Wall Street for having legitimate concerns about how uncontrolled immigration impacts their jobs, wages, schools, hospitals, police departments, and communities. But those who do the mocking are often ensconced behind gated compounds, guarded private schools, chauffeured SUVs, and fenced-off estates."
...
The document details how former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) director John Morton issued the Morton Memos bearing his name. These memos led to an “enforcement collapse.” Sessions then shifts into how immigration is intricately connected with the economy, in that the numbers of foreign workers imported into the country hurt American workers.

From there, it details how the welfare state—which Republicans are supposed to be opposed to—thrives because of open borders immigration policies. And Sessions provides polling data and messaging suggestions for Republicans who seek to represent their constituents rather than special interests such as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s lobbying firm FWD.us. Sessions’ document then turns to what it calls the “hoax” Silicon Valley perpetrates on the political debate, in which lobbyists for high tech companies argue—incorrectly—there is a shortage of workers in America available to do such high-tech jobs.
...
More: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/12/jeff-sessions-defines-republican-position-on-immigration-in-25-page-roadmap-document/

Brian4Liberty
01-14-2015, 12:03 PM
"Simply put, we have more jobseekers than jobs"

http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/67ae7163-6616-4023-a5c4-534c53e6fc26/immigration-primer-for-the-114th-congress.pdf (Page 9)

erowe1
01-14-2015, 12:15 PM
"Simply put, we have more jobseekers than jobs"

What an inexcusably ignorant comment.

AlexAmore
01-14-2015, 12:24 PM
Immigrants. both legal and illegal, create more jobs.

Let's say illegal immigrant "Martinez", sneaks in and starts working as an under the table construction worker for Joe Blow. So that's one less construction job, BUT now construction is cheaper to produce.

Martinez also needs:

Food
Shelter
Transportation
Gas

All of these things require more jobs to accommodate him, especially if millions, like him, come over the border. In other words, it's takes many more jobs to keep him alive, than the one job he takes himself. On top of that, whatever he produces becomes cheaper for the general American people because he's willing to work for less.

How do you lose with this proposition?

AuH20
01-14-2015, 12:31 PM
What an inexcusably ignorant comment.

Not in this post-industrial American society.

Brian4Liberty
01-14-2015, 12:36 PM
What an inexcusably ignorant comment.

Yeah, supply and demand is a fake concept!

William Tell
01-14-2015, 12:48 PM
"Simply put, we have more jobseekers than jobs"



Truth.:cool:

Zippyjuan
01-14-2015, 02:26 PM
"Simply put, we have more jobseekers than jobs"

http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/67ae7163-6616-4023-a5c4-534c53e6fc26/immigration-primer-for-the-114th-congress.pdf (Page 9)

Always. Only under Communism is unemployment zero.

Brian4Liberty
01-14-2015, 02:47 PM
Always. Only under Communism is unemployment zero.

So says our state propaganda officer.

And you are quite wrong. Under a booming and healthy economy, it is very possible for job demand to outstrip labor supply. It is (or has been) happening right now in areas of the US with expanding oil production. It can also happen after war or plague, when the population is dramatically reduced. A booming economy is preferable.

AuH20
01-14-2015, 02:51 PM
So says our state propaganda officer.

And you are quite wrong. Under a booming and healthy economy, it is very possible for job demand to outstrip labor supply. It is (or has been) happening right now in areas of the US with expanding oil production. It can also happen after war or plague, when the population is dramatically reduced. A booming economy is preferable.

especially in our ponzi style 'service based' economy. There are certain sectors of the economy that have been deliberately phased out over the last 35 years.