PDA

View Full Version : Guardian Article on the racist candidate Steve Scalise - only ask Ron Paul




Republicanguy
12-30-2014, 08:58 AM
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/30/steve-scalise-republicans-neo-nazis-ron-paul

By Jeb Lund.

Congress member, not candidate.**

Danke
12-30-2014, 09:44 AM
You and NACBA need to get a room.

AuH20
12-30-2014, 09:47 AM
I wonder how many congressional reps are allied with La Raza? It's not excusing Scalise but it's an interesting juxtaposition.

NACBA
12-30-2014, 10:01 AM
I wonder how many congressional reps are allied with La Raza? It's not excusing Scalise but it's an interesting juxtaposition.

What does La Raza mean in English?

NACBA
12-30-2014, 10:01 AM
You and NACBA need to get a room.

Do they still have Chat rooms here? :eek:

HOLLYWOOD
12-30-2014, 10:30 AM
Whether anyone likes it or not... every single person has the right to redresses and grievances to representatives, especially when they are being taxed from every conceivable direction.

Be more leery of Scalise meeting with; Banksters, Big Pharma, Wealthy Ideological Factions, Insurance, Military-Security Corporate, Lobbyists Executives, they are far more of a threat and destructive to Americans and America.

Race is always used as the tool of the elites/rulinig class to keep the lower classes divided and fighting with one another. Especially with government-Marxist owned & controlled media.

NACBA
12-30-2014, 10:35 AM
Whether anyone likes it or not... every single person has the right to redresses and grievances to representatives, especially when they are being taxed from every conceivable direction.

Be more leery of Scalise meeting with; Banksters, Big Pharma, Wealthy Ideological Factions, Insurance, Military-Security Corporate, Lobbyists Executives, they are far more of a threat and destructive to Americans and America.

Race is always used as the tool of the elites/rulinig class to keep the lower classes divided and fighting with one another. Especially with government-Marxist owned & controlled media.


Steve Scalise's Legislative Record is a Bigger Problem Than His Past Speaking Gigs

http://reason.com/blog/2014/12/30/steve-scalises-legislative-record-is-a-b?n_play=54a2d448e4b09622b5363166 via @reason

Origanalist
12-30-2014, 10:35 AM
What does La Raza mean in English?

I think it's a pop song.

Origanalist
12-30-2014, 10:36 AM
La kookaraza, Lahookaraza..

JK/SEA
12-30-2014, 11:19 AM
race card again...when all else fails..

yawn.

Feeding the Abscess
12-30-2014, 06:52 PM
Slogan after slogan, catchphrase after catchphrase.

That article was like reading MadLibs.

cajuncocoa
12-30-2014, 07:42 PM
Steve Scalise's Legislative Record is a Bigger Problem Than His Past Speaking Gigs

http://reason.com/blog/2014/12/30/steve-scalises-legislative-record-is-a-b?n_play=54a2d448e4b09622b5363166 via @reason
Well, I coulda told ya that. :rolleyes:

Republicanguy
01-05-2015, 10:52 AM
In honest truth, I have my doubts about Mr Paul and his views on society, he's an old guy and a lot of users here are sure white and older. But hey we can all walk around with our own prejudices, bigotry.

I have never been a fan of his domestic outlook, and I wouldn't vote for somebody here my country with that sort of outlook of less government to the point where charity and the private sector take over.

There is plenty of it here on these forums, it's just masked as extreme Liberty.

Just was reading up on the problem families scheme once proposed by PM Blair, his critics saw it as eugenics. A bit extreme, but him being from the background he was, pretty much middle class, with some working class traits. Saw the most dysfunctional families needing guidance to stop crime. I personally couldn't disagree with that, especially if one had lived near people with that past.

A society should be bedrocked on intellect, progressive vision. Not jingoistic ignorance, based on emotive snap policies.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-05-2015, 11:30 AM
I have never been a fan of his domestic outlook, and I wouldn't vote for somebody here my country with that sort of outlook of less government to the point where charity and the private sector take over.



So you're a fan of you not personally giving to others, but making others give through government mandate?

Athan
01-05-2015, 11:33 AM
In honest truth, I have my doubts about Mr Paul and his views on society, he's an old guy and a lot of users here are sure white and older. But hey we can all walk around with our own prejudices, bigotry.

I'm a hispanic Tejano dumbass. Why do people's skin color on here matter anyway? You can't see the skin color of people calling you a dumbass in a posting forum.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-05-2015, 11:46 AM
Why do people's skin color on here matter anyway?

It matters to the prejudiced lib. The one who turns his personal flaws into a societal issue.

JK/SEA
01-05-2015, 12:31 PM
op=drool donkey.

i laugh at his own perceived 'intellect'...hahaha...

next.

AuH20
01-05-2015, 12:55 PM
In honest truth, I have my doubts about Mr Paul and his views on society, he's an old guy and a lot of users here are sure white and older. But hey we can all walk around with our own prejudices, bigotry.

I have never been a fan of his domestic outlook, and I wouldn't vote for somebody here my country with that sort of outlook of less government to the point where charity and the private sector take over.

There is plenty of it here on these forums, it's just masked as extreme Liberty.

Just was reading up on the problem families scheme once proposed by PM Blair, his critics saw it as eugenics. A bit extreme, but him being from the background he was, pretty much middle class, with some working class traits. Saw the most dysfunctional families needing guidance to stop crime. I personally couldn't disagree with that, especially if one had lived near people with that past.

A society should be bedrocked on intellect, progressive vision. Not jingoistic ignorance, based on emotive snap policies.

Keynesian economic theory sure sounds shortsighted and emotionally based to me.

Republicanguy
01-05-2015, 06:34 PM
Austrian economics could be said the same.

Reading this, Mr who types he's hispanic. People of Mr Paul's era aren't necessarily as accepting as somebody of my age group, but like I typed we can all have our own positions on various topics. We don't all walk the same road, and may be afraid to state certain positions.

His son is a little more open minded, he's a baby boomer, but that is no guarantee that just depends on various factors, the environment our a person.

And when I mention the difference of less government and more, I'm getting on about society's problems are just brushed aside. When Mr Paul was asked in 1988 as the libertarian candidate he was like well there is thousands of people out there with problems, how ever I don't have the right to take money off you, to pay for these people's realities. I.e. a social program.

So essentially individuals or the charity should help these people. In my society that wouldn't work here, there are some who may hold these views for sure, but those are people who never needed any assistance, well doers in reality.

PM Blair was never a traditional socialist, and could never be. A champaigne socialist, with a million pound house or more, more than one property.

What is a socialist, somebody that believes in a NHS, unemployment benefits, government provided homes, but to the hilt you go down the road of Tony Benn and Micheal Foot. Any further and one is a commie which is just fascism of another kind. And to the right, less of all that, any extreme, militarism, fascism.

I remember I met one English communist who was a EU integrationist, and open to a republic. But ultimately, the worker's flag was his only flag. Quite an old guy, almost eighty. He was a fan of the peace campaigner who used to camp outside the UK parliament for almost ten years.