This just in, Sandy Hookers getting sued for Christmas.

[mrsat_98]

http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/12/26/breaking-film-maker-author-sues-big-media-over-sandy-hook/

Lawsuit Seeks $1 Trillion For Fraud and Terrorism in Sensationalized Coverage of “Staged FEMA Exercise”

Filmmaker and Author William Brandon Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 Trillion Against Big Media Over Sandy Hook Massacre Coverage

Here is Mr. Shanley’s Statement:


“After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqcaaE6aFX8 — Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”

Attached is a photo staged by the Newtown Bee, a wider view of that action being staged on a different day that the emergency altogether, and a sampling of front pages that terrorized the world with the fake photo.

Mr. Shanley is the producer of The Made-for-TV Election starring Martin Sheenthat analyzed media coverage in the tectonic Carter-Reagan election of 1980. He is also the author of books on quantum physics, including Alice and the Quantum Cat (2011).

Dr. James Fetzer, whose 35 articles on Sandy Hook for Veteran’s Today qualify him for the highest investigative journalism awards, and School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig, whose investigative expertise as a former Florida State Police officer, and loving attention as a former principal, makes this case’s particulars comprehensible to all, will be called as expert witnesses.

It is their scholarship and bravery that makes these Complaints possible for the shear breadth and scope and detail of evidence they have assembled. Hundreds of independent researchers have also made this day possible, and Mr. Shanley claims they will be tracked down and rewarded heartily for their bravery and mindfulness of America.

Mr. Shanley’s Complaint states, in part:

Defendants entered in a multi-year conspiracy, meeting in groups separately and together, to commit fraud and terrorism, i.e., to brainwash the public into thinking a lone gunman drill known as the “Sandy Hook Massacre” was real, when in fact it was a staged FEMA National Level Exercise Event that redirected government resources to terrorize the public. These crimes were undertaken with the intent of subverting the US Constitution and to affect national, state and local laws. This fraud involved lying to the public, faking news, publishing one-sided news reports, censoring reality, suppressing facts, and deliberately skewing the news to shift public perceptions.

The true costs of this breach of integrity and trust to society are unfathomable. Instead of fulfilling their Constitutional Role as the People’s Surrogates and being honest brokers of information, the Plaintiff will show how the men and women who dominate the TV news industry in the United States broke laws, besmirched the First Amendment, their Constitutional role as government watchdogs, and forfeited the right to report the news, and thereby profit from news production and distribution. The sine qua non of journalism is the search for truth. Our Fourth Estate chose a different path. Punitive damages of one year’s annual revenue from each Defendant are being sought to establish a News Trust, that will free journalism and restore trust and integrity to our communications sources. A democracy cannot survive this tyranny over human consciousness.

The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion used, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint.

Press Release
For Immediate Release
December 25, 2014
Contact: William Brandon Shanley
wbs2012@zoho.com
860-857-2042

[squarepusher]

I hereby summon Hot Topics

[tasteless]

Sandy Hooker sounds like a prostitute that you pick up at the beach

[Czolgosz]

Is this originally from the Onion?

[Working Poor]

Is this originally from the Onion?

Good question. Yet it seems that many people feel very suspicious of the Sandy Hook case.

[jmdrake]

Good question. Yet it seems that many people feel very suspicious of the Sandy Hook case.

Okay. I've purposefully avoided the Sandy Hook rabbit trail. But.....I'm part way through this video. Shocking! Watch it and let me know what you think. He's debunking the Sandy Hook official story using the official report and comparing it to the dashcam video. If this is real, than Sandy Hook was a hoax.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqcaaE6aFX8

[mrsat_98]

Sandy Hook is a hoax among many others.

[Working Poor]

Sandy Hook is a hoax among many others.

I feel fortunate that there is a place to express concern for this. I have had doubts since I heard the 1st breaking news @ 2 oclock on the day of the event my bs detector was going off the meter.

[mrsat_98]

Have you seen the video of the bloodless damage free patrol car with cops giving cpr to the now allegedly dead cops arm in the recent cops shooting incident starring a dude that looks like dc sniper lee malvo.

[phill4paul]

I have a sneaking suspicion that kiddie porn is gonna show up on this guys computer.

[Slave Mentality]

There are MANY WTC Building 7's in this case. Many.

[Slave Mentality]

Have you seen the video of the bloodless damage free patrol car with cops giving cpr to the now allegedly dead cops arm in the recent cops shooting incident starring a dude that looks like dc sniper lee malvo.

Hook some brothers up with a link man?

[donnay]

How about the coincidences of Hurricane... err... Superstorm... err... Frankenstorm (http://www.livescience.com/24380-hurricane-sandy-status-data.html) Sandy (which decimated Sandy Hook, NJ) and then the alleged shootings at the elementary school, Sandy Hook in the same election year? 2012 was the year Sandy was a terrorizing name. The scriptwriters really need new material.

[Inkblots]

Oh good, another raft of nuisance lawsuits to kludge up our already overburdened court system. I suppose they'll be thrown out fairly quickly, but even a summary dismissal takes up valuable court time.

[thoughtomator]

Oh good, another raft of nuisance lawsuits to kludge up our already overburdened court system. I suppose they'll be thrown out fairly quickly, but even a summary dismissal takes up valuable court time.

Valuable court time, eh? Takes away from all that "justice" they produce or something?

[mrsat_98]

Oh good, another raft of nuisance lawsuits to kludge up our already overburdened court system. I suppose they'll be thrown out fairly quickly, but even a summary dismissal takes up valuable court time.

Can't muck up the smooth functioning of the meat grinder by grinding up the wrong meat.

[mrsat_98]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixs-ySsaSDQ

I think this is the same clip early on. I will see if I can find the one that points it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixs-ySsaSDQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pv3X3MPFwE4

you can see it here as well. look at the shot cop laying on the sidewalk.

[squarepusher]

Ron Paul Forums is a hoax. Government psy op high tech style.

[mrsat_98]

Ron Paul Forums is a hoax. Government psy op high tech style.

Don't start speading lies you know full well its a parody site.

[Zippyjuan]

How about the coincidences of Hurricane... err... Superstorm... err... Frankenstorm (http://www.livescience.com/24380-hurricane-sandy-status-data.html) Sandy (which decimated Sandy Hook, NJ) and then the alleged shootings at the elementary school, Sandy Hook in the same election year? 2012 was the year Sandy was a terrorizing name. The scriptwriters really need new material.

Half of all years are election years- so statistically, half of all events happen in an election year.


no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago.

The parents of dead children are probably happy to learn they did not have to go to all those funerals and their kids will be home for Christmas- if not for dinner.

Seems Shanley is big on conspiracies. In this one piece, he covers 9/11, Clinton-Vince Foster, and JFK. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/091106_smoking_gun5.shtml

[Zippyjuan]

Dr. James Fetzer, whose 35 articles on Sandy Hook for Veteran’s Today qualify him for the highest investigative journalism awards, and School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig, whose investigative expertise as a former Florida State Police officer, and loving attention as a former principal, makes this case’s particulars comprehensible to all, will be called as expert witnesses.

Veterans Today as their authorative source? The publisher of VT Gordon Duff himself says more than half of what they publish is made up http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/political-science/gordon-duff-admits-to-veterans-today-disinfo.html . (I can find no investigative journalism awards Fetzer has won or even been nominated for). Veterans Today has never won any journalism awards.


.I have as good access to information as anyone, probably - anyone I know of - about 30% of what's on Veteran's Today is patently False. At least 40% of what I write is at least purposefully partially false

[ClydeCoulter]

Veterans Today as their authorative source? The publisher of VT Gordon Duff himself says more than half of what they publish is made up http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/political-science/gordon-duff-admits-to-veterans-today-disinfo.html . (I can find no investigative journalism awards Fetzer has won or even been nominated for). Veterans Today has never won any journalism awards.

No as their source. He, Dr. Fetzer, wrote the articles for them.

[Zippyjuan]

He is cited as an "expert witness"- not source. You are right on that detail. But Veterans Today is notoriously unreliable. Even their editor has said so.

[PRB]

Is this originally from the Onion?

who writes better comedy, theOnion or Infowars? (or infowars wannabes like naturalnews, theeconomiccollapseblog, cracked)

[PRB]

He is cited as an "expert witness"- not source. You are right on that detail. But Veterans Today is notoriously unreliable. Even their editor has said so.

VeteransToday is everything BUT unreliable, unless you're a paid shill by the NWO to deny any conspiracy theories before even looking at the EVIDENCE. care to share where and when the editor has said so?

[devil21]

You mean to tell me there are people that still believe the official story of Sandy Hook? Jeez I thought everybody knew it was a drill and faked by the media by now.

Suing media won't get very far though since courts have already ruled that media outlets have no legal responsibility to report truth whatsoever.

[PRB]

You mean to tell me there are people that still believe the official story of Sandy Hook? Jeez I thought everybody knew it was a drill and faked by the media by now.

Suing media won't get very far though since courts have already ruled that media outlets have no legal responsibility to report truth whatsoever.

Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime. And yes, people outside the liberty movement general believe every official version story, only liberty minded people are smart enough to see through the smoke.

[Zippyjuan]

The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion used, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint.

Ten billion used what? Tampons? Newspapers?

[pcosmar]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.

[devil21]

Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime. And yes, people outside the liberty movement general believe every official version story, only liberty minded people are smart enough to see through the smoke.

I am curious at what point do media lies cross that line into the proverbial "screaming FIRE in a crowded theater" scenario? When do the lies start becoming actionable because they cause others to act in a potentially dangerous manner? If a person can be prosecuted for inciting an adverse reaction, where is the line for the media? It could be argued that making people act, through fear, as if there's a mass shooter on every corner waiting to kill them or their loved ones is approaching that line. I have no doubt that the agenda is heading that direction.

[donnay]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.


What do you want to bet they'll settle out of court?

[AngryCanadian]

Since They are getting sued that means they are scared of them spreading the truth. Why would you otherwise would sue them? they have every right to say what they want about the event.


As much as 9/11 truthers.

[Zippyjuan]

The suit is being filed to simply draw attention. It is silly- especially the $1 trillion part. It won't be settled- it will be dismissed.

[donnay]

The suit is being filed to simply draw attention. It is silly- especially the $1 trillion part. It won't be settled- it will be dismissed.

I was referring to the lawsuit against the gun manufacturer.

[PRB]

I am curious at what point do media lies cross that line into the proverbial "screaming FIRE in a crowded theater" scenario?


Keyword : "falsely".

My guess would be if it turned into something like a bank run or actual crime was advocated.



When do the lies start becoming actionable because they cause others to act in a potentially dangerous manner?


Whenever you can prove a connection and/or show that absence such a provocation, the act would not happen.



If a person can be prosecuted for inciting an adverse reaction, where is the line for the media?


The media is hardly above the law, so the standard is the same.



It could be argued that making people act, through fear, as if there's a mass shooter on every corner waiting to kill them or their loved ones is approaching that line. I have no doubt that the agenda is heading that direction.

It's not that simple, or else Alex Jones would be executed by now.

[Trimbeaux]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.


What evidence, I have not seen one picture or security video of that shot up school which had cameras or a dead body at Sandy Hook Elementary.
In fact they destroyed the school as fast as possible so a good majority of what happened is now gone forever.
I certainly do not trust the main stream media (Do we even consider them reputable sources anymore) or the authorities which bungled this story from the beginning.
Heck for me Connecticut Chief state medical examiner H. Wayne Carver's press conference was so surreal and ridiculous I didn't believe anything he said.
The weapons changed a few times too, until they settled on that evil black rifle again.
(which Carver kept mentioning the long weapon unconvincingly over and over in his press conference)
That's all I needed, what ever happened there did not go down as the authorities or the press reported.
I am with you, what evidence will be shown at the Bushmaster suit certainly not the bungled mess the authorities put together?

[pcosmar]

What evidence, I have not seen one picture or security video of that shot up school which had cameras or a dead body at Sandy Hook Elementary.
In fact they destroyed the school as fast as possible so a good majority of what happened is now gone forever.
I certainly do not trust the main stream media (Do we even consider them reputable sources anymore) or the authorities which bungled this story from the beginning.
Heck for me Connecticut Chief state medical examiner H. Wayne Carver's press conference was so surreal and ridiculous I didn't believe anything he said.
The weapons changed a few times too, until they settled on that evil black rifle again.
(which Carver kept mentioning the long weapon unconvincingly over and over in his press conference)
That's all I needed, what ever happened there did not go down as the authorities or the press reported.
I am with you, what evidence will be shown at the Bushmaster suit certainly not the bungled mess the authorities put together?

No one has seen any evidence. and some of the media coverage was staged and questionable.

Any trial will only highlight this.

[Noob]

A lawsuit about 9 11 media cover-up was won in court.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI5lEZaHCaI

[ghengis86]

A lawsuit about 9 11 media cover-up was won in court.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI5lEZaHCaI

You are required to purchasing a license to own a TV in the UK?!?? WTF

[Weston White]

Oh good, another raft of nuisance lawsuits to kludge up our already overburdened court system. I suppose they'll be thrown out fairly quickly, but even a summary dismissal takes up valuable court time.

...I'm sorry, I wasn't listening.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11115/111150904/3718808-0968027869-Yeah-.jpg

[donnay]

You are required to purchasing a license to own a TV in the UK?!?? WTF

They have been doing it for well over 50 years. They would go around the neighborhoods with a radar dish atop a van and check to see who was using a television or radio without the proper permits and licensing.

[Weston White]

I don’t see this suit providing any real exposure to the 2012 hoax of Newtown, CT. The scope of this lawsuit will be only on the firearms manufacturer, and its “dangerous” products—further, Bushmaster will not have access to any classified information that the general public would otherwise have through public information requests. Moreover, the lawsuit is desperately pathetic and will effectively fail: Why Shooting Victims Can't Win Lawsuits Against Gunmakers (http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-12-16/sandy-hook-victims-will-misfire-in-bushmaster-ar-15-gun-lawsuit#p1).

[devil21]

Keyword : "falsely".

My guess would be if it turned into something like a bank run or actual crime was advocated.



Whenever you can prove a connection and/or show that absence such a provocation, the act would not happen.



The media is hardly above the law, so the standard is the same.



It's not that simple, or else Alex Jones would be executed by now.

Your own words:
"Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime".

But actually it can be if it directly leads to people acting in a manner that endangers themselves and others. Constantly pushing lies that lead uninformed people to believe there's crazy gunman on every corner waiting to kill them approaches that line. Consider that falsely yelling FIRE in a theater itself is the general standard, not whether anyone was actually injured as a result of it. If all people make it safely out of the theater and there was no fire, does that mean the 'yeller' didn't commit a crime of reckless endangerment or can't be sued for psychological trauma?

[Zippyjuan]

A lawsuit about 9 11 media cover-up was won in court.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI5lEZaHCaI

Actually the guy lost that case.


District Judge Stephen Nicholls said: 'This is not a public inquiry into 9/11. This is an offence under section 363 of the Communications Act.'
He said he had difficulty sitting in the magistrates’ court as he 'did not believe he had the power to rule under the terrorism act'.

He said: 'Even if I accept the evidence you say, this court has no power to create a defence in the manner which you put forward.'

Sentencing, Judge Nicholls said: 'Mr Rooke puts the basis of his defence under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act, effectively asking the court to find the BBC is a terrorist organisation and that if he continues to pay them he himself is committing a criminal offence.

'I have explained to Mr Rooke even if I were to accept his evidence I would be unable to find a defence".

[PRB]

Your own words:
"Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime".

But actually it can be if it directly leads to people acting in a manner that endangers themselves and others.


Fair point, which is really saying, if your words directly lead to people acting in a criminal manner, it's not a question of whether you lied, it's a question of whether you're accountable, and how much. Lying per se is not a crime, nor is speaking the truth.



Constantly pushing lies that lead uninformed people to believe there's crazy gunman on every corner waiting to kill them approaches that line. Consider that falsely yelling FIRE in a theater itself is the general standard, not whether anyone was actually injured as a result of it.


No, you need actual injury, no harm no victim.



If all people make it safely out of the theater and there was no fire, does that mean the 'yeller' didn't commit a crime of reckless endangerment or can't be sued for psychological trauma?

Correct, psychological trauma is a scam to get government benefits and for government to tax innocent people out of sympathy. There's no scientific evidence that anybody has suffered psycho trauma, when this was exposed DSM changed the name to PTSD. But as we know, just as calling global warming doesn't make climate change true, nor does calling Gender Identity Disorder Gender Dysphoria doesn't make it less of a disorder, using words to confuse people won't change the facts.

Lincoln said it right : How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.
There's no definitely way to prove a person "suffered" psychological trauma that can't be faked. Suffering emotionally is purely subjective, only physical injuries are provable and actionable. When you start making injuries anything but physical, you're opening the door for Fascism and thought crimes, this is the same justification for criminalizing stalking and drunk driving, NO VICTIM NO CRIME. PERIOD.

Since we're on the topic of trauma, 9/11 and scam. Here's it is. 3 birds one stone.
http://nypost.com/2014/02/24/more-to-be-charged-in-911-social-security-disability-scam/

9/11 didn't happen, trauma didn't happen, and scams happened. These people pretended to be traumatized so they can live on freeloading. Sham and shame.

[PRB]

Actually the guy lost that case.

he lost the case because the bad guys have more money!!!!!

[devil21]

No, you need actual injury, no harm no victim.
...................
Correct, psychological trauma is a scam

Good to know that PRB/Zippy sockpuppet thinks intentionally psychologically tormenting people is not a crime (criminal) or a cause for damage (civil). Shill status confirmed again.

[PRB]

Good to know that PRB thinks intentionally psychologically tormenting people is not a crime (criminal) or a cause for damage (civil). Shill status confirmed again.

You believe the government has business deciding what people can or can't do without proof of any physical injury? and I'm the shill?

[devil21]

You believe the government has business deciding what people can or can't do without proof of any physical injury? and I'm the shill?

First, the main issue is whether there are grounds for a lawsuit, which is a civil matter, and not directly about the government deciding anything, other than being litigated in a court of law. Second, only a psychopathic degenerate would view humans as nothing more than physical bodies, which you clearly do. Hmm....I'm trying to remember what group of people think the average person is nothing but a head of cattle......it's on the tip of tongue. Help me out PRB?

Third, yes you are the shill. And you're not a very good one.

[Zippyjuan]

Good to know that PRB/Zippy sockpuppet thinks intentionally psychologically tormenting people is not a crime (criminal) or a cause for damage (civil). Shill status confirmed again.

Examples of torture I have supported?

[phill4paul]

Examples of torture I have supported?

Your positively rainbow and unicorns presentations of the the state of the economy? Now that's torturous. And the proof is in your sig. :p

[devil21]

Examples of torture I have supported?

I can name at least a couple you try to engage in on this forum. Lord only knows what you do in real life.

[PRB]

I can name at least a couple you try to engage in on this forum. Lord only knows what you do in real life.

So let's see some.

*gets popcorn*

[PRB]

First, the main issue is whether there are grounds for a lawsuit, which is a civil matter, and not directly about the government deciding anything, other than being litigated in a court of law.


That is correct, the government decides what is actionable, which is another way of saying the government in effect decides what rights you have to sue, or what rights you have. Regardless of whether we like it. To answer whether something is actionable, we msut first see if something was done, seeing as I believe psycho trauma is made up, I wouldn't find anything based on psychotrauma to be actionable or compensation worthy.



Second, only a psychopathic degenerate would view humans as nothing more than physical bodies, which you clearly do.


I'll change my mind if you can prove otherwise.



Hmm....I'm trying to remember what group of people think the average person is nothing but a head of cattle......it's on the tip of tongue. Help me out PRB?


Intellectually honest scientists.



Third, yes you are the shill. And you're not a very good one.

What can I say to convince you otherwise?

[devil21]

That is correct, the government decides what is actionable, which is another way of saying the government in effect decides what rights you have to sue, or what rights you have. Regardless of whether we like it. To answer whether something is actionable, we msut first see if something was done, seeing as I believe psycho trauma is made up, I wouldn't find anything based on psychotrauma to be actionable or compensation worthy.

Im not an anarchist so yes I think a state government does have a role in determining what is actionable and what is not. Fortunately, most states have determined that intentionally inflicting mental duress is actionable.



I'll change my mind if you can prove otherwise.

You obviously view other humans as nothing more than physical bodies. I have nothing to prove. You proved it yourself with your own statements.



Intellectually honest scientists.

Nope, that's not the one. Though many in the "psychiatric" business are members of the group Im thinking of.



What can I say to convince you otherwise?

Absolutely nothing. Your statements and circular arguments give you away, among other things.

[PRB]

Im not an anarchist so yes I think a state government does have a role in determining what is actionable and what is not. Fortunately, most states have determined that intentionally inflicting mental duress is actionable.


The same government which believes gays and women should be equal, sounds like you have no problem with expanding government for liberal and egalitarian purposes and especially that which perpetuates scams like mental duress which can't be proven.



You obviously view other humans as nothing more than physical bodies. I have nothing to prove. You proved it yourself with your own statements.


I admit that I believe humans are nothing more than physical bodies, have you either a counter argument and proof to the contrary?

If you think there's something wrong with believing humans are "nothing more than physical bodies", I'm interested to hear what you believe and why.



Nope, that's not the one. Though many in the "psychiatric" business are members of the group Im thinking of.


Psychiatric people are exactly the ones which believe there's such a thing as mental distress, duress, trauma and all those other lies. I'm on the side of intellectually honest scientists who do not buy that shit.



Absolutely nothing. Your statements and circular arguments give you away, among other things.

Ok, at least you've admitted that you've made up your mind.

[devil21]

^^^^^^
You must have forgotten what forum you're on. I can't imagine Ron Paul advocating intentionally causing psychological duress to others as harmless, supporting a notion that people are just cattle, and that "intellectually honest" scientists think psychological duress (such as torture) is a-ok because psychological duress doesn't exist. Perhaps you would be more comfy in a neocon forum, where torture and disregard for human life is more acceptable?

[PRB]

^^^^^^
You must have forgotten what forum you're on. I can't imagine Ron Paul advocating intentionally causing psychological duress to others as harmless, supporting a notion that people are just cattle, and that "intellectually honest" scientists think psychological duress (such as torture) is a-ok because psychological duress doesn't exist. Perhaps you would be more comfy in a neocon forum, where torture and disregard for human life is more acceptable?

Back up a little, how about you start by telling me how I am wrong. Do tell what humans are other than physical bodies.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc4oajSpxC1qzytg1.jpg

[devil21]

I won't assist your intelligence gathering any further. I'm sure my file is already quite extensive. Shalom to you and yours though.

[osan]

This just in... The body of William Brandon Shanley was found this morning in a dumpster. Cause of death is unknown at this time, but police say there was no foul play.

[PRB]

I won't assist your intelligence gathering any further. I'm sure my file is already quite extensive. Shalom to you and yours though.

there's no intelligence gathering here, and the fact you're using this as an excuse to answer a question you brought up is quite laughable.

you're going to mock and accuse me of being wrong for believing that humans are nothing more than physical bodies, but you're unable to tell me what you believe? Goes to show you either don't know what you're talking about, or you know how your own answer is far more childish and ridiculous than mine.

[PRB]

This just in... The body of William Brandon Shanley was found this morning in a dumpster. Cause of death is unknown at this time, but police say there was no foul play.

source?

[Ronin Truth]

Wouldn't you think that the hookers could at least wash or brush the sand off for Christmas?

[Weston White]

“If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.” ― Mark Twain

“No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar” ― Abraham Lincoln



Mystery: Sandy Hook Victim Dies (again) in Pakistan
Photo of child killed at Sandy Hook shows up at Pakistani school shooting


A large-scale attack on a school in Peshawar, Pakistan, last month left 132 school children and 10 teachers dead.

Among the alleged victims emerged the familiar face of Noah Pozner, one of the children supposedly killed in the December 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

Without explanation, Pozner’s image has appeared in multiple photos and reports of the high-profile Army Public School shooting, reportedly carried out by 9 members of an elite Taliban terror group on December 16.


http://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/noah-p.jpg

http://www.infowars.com/mystery-sandy-hook-victim-dies-again-in-pakistan/

[limequat]

WTF?