5 Reasons Liberals Tired of War Should Vote for Rand Paul Over Hillary Clinton

[jct74]

5 Reasons Liberals Tired of War Should Vote for Rand Paul Over Hillary Clinton.

by H. A. Goodman
11/21/2014 6:21 am EST

If you've read my over 70 Huffington Post pieces or my writing in other publications, seen my debate on immigration reform and my HuffPost Live discussion with Marc Lamont Hill about Ferguson, listened to my appearance on America's first LGBT sports radio show, or read my two novels, and still believe that I'm not a true liberal, then great. I'm an American, not a vapid label that fits into anyone's political paradigm. I don't live in the liberal equivalent of the nation called Reagan. This fairy tale country is unlike our current "War Machine" described in The New Yorker, where (because of ISIS beheadings) "Even women, the bedrock of the Democratic Party, appeared to be swinging toward the G.O.P." on foreign policy and terrorism. As Ralph Nader recently stated when explaining why he'd sooner vote for Rand Paul than Hillary Clinton, "Who's liberal and who's conservative anymore?"

Furthermore, I've already been accused of having an "agenda" in writing my last piece on Rand Paul. I must confess, this true. I'm National Chairman of the "Liberals For Certain Libertarian Values I Admire Yet Will Not Vote for Paul If He Panders to GOP Hawks or Racists Before 2016" Committee. If you find this organization objectionable, then please write to P. O. Box 1101 "I Do Not Give a G-------n What Anyone Thinks of Me" Road, CA.

I'm always up for a spirited, respectful debate, but no longer with Bizzaro World Rush Limbaughs who'd willingly cannibalize their fellow liberals while crying, "You'd vote for Rand Paul just because of war?" I've heard this from many people and I just don't know what to make of such a viewpoint. Uh, yeah, perpetual war is the biggest issue facing this country and correlates directly to the powers of the president.

...

read more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/5-reasons-liberals-tired_b_6197694.html

[tangent4ronpaul]

If we end up going against Hillary Clinton, I think we should start referring to her as Military Clinton. Military sounds a lot like Hillary and in the middle of a sentence could be read over and easily missed. It's subtle, but it gets the message across in one word.

-t

[FriedChicken]

If we end up going against Hillary Clinton, I think we should start referring to her as Military Clinton. Military sounds a lot like Hillary and in the middle of a sentence could be read over and easily missed. It's subtle, but it gets the message across in one word.

-t

That sounds awesome.

[eleganz]

If we end up going against Hillary Clinton, I think we should start referring to her as Military Clinton. Military sounds a lot like Hillary and in the middle of a sentence could be read over and easily missed. It's subtle, but it gets the message across in one word.

-t

That was a brilliant idea, quick get the memes ready! But the best timing would be to unleash it the second when her nomination is inevitable.

[satchelmcqueen]

millitary clinton is perfect

[ghengisconrad]

"Whatever we do, don't vote for Military Clinton in 2016!"

My current facebook status.

[Feeding the Abscess]

That sounds like an awful idea. The populace at large worships the military.

[scottditzen]

"Whatever we do, don't vote for Military Clinton in 2016!"

My current facebook status.

"What! Yer against the U.S. Military!!???"
-Idiot Voters

[acptulsa]

"What! Yer against the U.S. Military!!???"
-Idiot Voters

Which flavor of idiot voters?

You don't see the advantage of hanging a label only Republicrats could like on a Demopublican candidate?

[Inkblots]

That sounds like an awful idea. The populace at large worships the military.

True, but if used in places where primarily anti-war progressive types might see it, it could be useful.

[Okaloosa]

That sounds like an awful idea. The populace at large worships the military.

This is true, Bill Clinton was known for "gutting" the Military. Hillary was also known for being disrespectful to her secret service and Military teams that would travel and work with her. We need to label her as disrespectful to the Military and wanting to use them recklessly by bringing big government around the world.

[tangent4ronpaul]

That sounds like an awful idea. The populace at large worships the military.

They may like the military and support the troops but they are sick and tired of their offspring coming back in body bags or more often crippled for life and these endless, pointless wars and fear. That is the message - nothing anti-military.

-t

[Okaloosa]

They may like the military and support the troops but they are sick and tired of their offspring coming back in body bags or more often crippled for life and these endless, pointless wars and fear. That is the message - nothing anti-military.

-t

Not if they are told the threat is more important. People want safety. Hillary needs to be labeled as being against the troops and for trying to control the lives of Americans and the rest of the planet. Calling her Military will just give her the older white neo-con vote and socialists against war will still vote for her.