Hillary Self Destructs

[DevilsAdvocate]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI

Her "Howard Dean" moment?

[Danke]

Whatever, she is still hot.

[puppetmaster]

Whatever, she is still hot.

Whatever you are high

[anaconda]

Whatever you are high

Maybe he meant in the political sense of the word.

[TheTexan]

She's right, trickle down isn't really working. I certainly don't see any yachts trickling down...

[anaconda]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI

Her "Howard Dean" moment?

I guess this is supposed to be another "you didn't build that" type of statement. I don't really see this as a meltdown - her supporters probably support and stand by this point of view. I don't think it hurt Obama one iota during the 2012 campaign. Probably just helped him and inspired the socialist minded voters. It was obviously fodder for the Republicans, as this will be.

[cindy25]

Dem ticket will be Booker-Warren

[jkr]

$tupid
is
as
$tupid


is

[Anti Federalist]

Whatever, she is still hot.

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/cross-eyed-hillary-e1264686401135.jpg

[squarepusher]

Whatever, she is still hot.

wut

[Spikender]

Look at her rubbing those hands together like a little goblin.

[Demigod]

Between the Clinton family and Madeleine Albright I could never make the decision who I would like to see impaled on a stake more.Hilary of course always manages to find new ways to steal the first place from Madeleine.

[Dr.3D]

Whatever, she is still hot.
Yeah, like a steaming pile on a cold day.

[ItsTime]

She's right, trickle down isn't really working. I certainly don't see any yachts trickling down...


http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/13/business/la-fi-mo-number-of-millionaires-in-us-reaches-a-new-high-20140313


Number of millionaires in U.S. reaches a new high
March 13, 2014|By Walter Hamilton
There are more millionaires in the United States than ever before.

The number of households with net worth of $1 million or more, excluding their homes, is at a record 9.63 million, according to a new report.


That eclipses the old mark of 9.2 million in 2007 before the global financial crisis, according to the Spectrem Group research firm. The tally of millionaires slipped to 6.7 million in 2008 as the financial crisis struck.

The study reinforces other data showing that the wealthy are doing well compared to many other segments of society.

QUIZ: How much do you know about the Dow?

"Most of the financial damage done by the recession has been erased by recent record-high markets in 2013 as well as continued rebound in the real estate markets," said George H. Walper Jr., Spectrem president. "In terms of the affluent investor, it is fair to say they have finally recovered from the economic downturn."

Rich people have been helped by the rebound in the stock market and the recovery in home prices in more exclusive areas. They also got a boost from superior creditworthiness, which allowed them to take advantage of record low interest rates in recent years.

The number of households with $25 million or more also is at a new high of 132,000, surpassing 125,000 in 2007, according to Spectrem.

And the number of families with $100,000 or more continues to climb. It’s now at 38.6 million, up from 37.4 million last year and 31.2 million in 2008.

[Ronin Truth]

When is the scheduled Bilderberg coronation?

[TheTexan]

http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/13/business/la-fi-mo-number-of-millionaires-in-us-reaches-a-new-high-20140313

I dont see any yachts trickling down to me

[Working Poor]

Whatever, she is still hot.
You better go hide behind your little partition...

[satchelmcqueen]

Whatever, she is still hot.

what....tha....fuck....????

[anaconda]

Dem ticket will be Booker-Warren

I think this is very possible, but will represent a risky move leftward given the state of the economy. And I've seen Warren sound like a real ditz when she tries to answer halfway difficult questions.

[FriedChicken]

Whatever, she is still hot.

I'm gonna say this wasn't in reference to her appearance ... politically speaking, I don't think these comments hurt her at all. I must say I was quite disappointed. When I read she "self destructed" I was hoping it involved something from acme.

So, politically, She she isn't worried bout' dis.

[jbauer]

Whatever you are high

Come on guys and gals. You can't see the humor in this?

[nobody's_hero]

Yeah, sadly, that's kind of the new norm. It's widely accepted that businesses don't create jobs. It might even be a majority viewpoint at this point, unfortunately.

Self destruct would be more like if she cut the head off of the Lincoln statue. Then again, that might not even be enough to shock people. Maybe if she cut the head off of a Lenin statue. That might make her supporters pause for a moment.

[ZENemy]

I love when people think stuff like this matters lol.

These people do not believe in bad news, ALL news puts her name in every bodies mind and that's all that matters to them.

She is the next president, nothing anyone can do about it.

[TheTexan]

She is the next president, nothing anyone can do about it.

Nah dude, Rand. If we vote hard enough, the media is not gonna be able to sabotage his campaign.

[ZENemy]

Nah dude, Rand. If we vote hard enough, the media is not gonna be able to sabotage his campaign.

Dammit, you are correct.

Im going to start up a "Vote harder" training session, we will do P90X style training but with voting until we are so good at voting we can neVAr Looze!!11

[dannno]

Whatever, she is still hot.

Wow, I think we finally found where the line is between you and me.

[HOLLYWOOD]

Hillary Clinton, You know, the old Trickle Down Economics"

I hate to break it to you 'Elitist Hillary', Obama, Washington DC, and the FEDERAL RESERVE have that policy on steroids now and it doesn't work. The poor are poorer and the middle class destroyed... Hillary's masters, wealthier than ever, more consolidated

If this marionette is the Marxist's ringer 2016, then it will be quite easy debating her trash statements, shoving them right back down her throat.

[enhanced_deficit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI

Her "Howard Dean" moment?

Wonder if she is cracking under pressure? She is human afterall and not a machine.

In her defense, there has been bad news for her recently.

Bad news for Hillary Clinton 2016: Monica Lewinsky joins Twitter (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?461707-Bad-news-for-Hillary-Clinton-2016-Monica-Lewinsky-joins-Twitter&)

[rpfocus]

Nah dude, Rand. If we vote hard enough, the media is not gonna be able to sabotage his campaign.

There was never more voting support than what Ron Paul received in 2012. Any article published on the Internet about RP, we owned the comments section. Money bombs left and right. Powerful grassroots support. It was a frenzy. In the end, the GOP saw he had a chance to win, got scared, and started with the crooked shenanigans (The Aye's Have It, Seat Our Delegates etc). The media isn't what needs to be feared. It's the slaves of the Koch Brothers that need to be feared - and they're the one's holding the keys to the gate. Never again. Down with the GOP.

[Deborah K]

I'd like to see the whole speech. I found the following, and it sounds like she's bitching about corporatism, not free markets. But, I'd like to know if she couches this whole thing in more government control, which she probably does, because in the clip below she complains about tax cuts to corporations.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r12OhGGhOSU

[anaconda]

I'd like to see the whole speech. I found the following, and it sounds like she's bitching about corporatism, not free markets. But, I'd like to know if she couches this whole thing in more government control, which she probably does, because in the clip below she complains about tax cuts to corporations.


Corporations can be one or two people. Or any other number from very small to very large. The "corporation" stigma needs to be challenged and unraveled.

[PaulConventionWV]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI

Her "Howard Dean" moment?

Hardly. Dream on, she still got a positive reception and people are probably going to believe her, despite the utter stupidity of that statement. They don't even dig deep enough to realize that businesses hire people, thus creating jobs... and it has nothing to do with trickle down economics! But people will eat it up. As soon as she said "Trickle-Down Economics", she had everyone's attention in the room because people were like, "Oh, yeah, now I know exactly what you mean."

They weren't even aware of the subtle brainwashing they had just endured as the synapses were being formed, forcing them further and further into the box, making them think like slaves. "I know the term trickle down economics so therefore I agree with you!" The numb idiocy of most Americans really leaves me dumbfounded.

Don't dream for a second that this is self-destruction. That tired old line has been used too many times and yet people still carry on liking the politicians who supposedly do it. This was probably a boost, if anything. I can't imagine it had too much of an impact in the first place with the sheep-like nature of people these days, grazing on the words of their herders.

[Dianne]

She is attempting to position herself left of Warren. I have no doubt Warren will run against her, since Obama is insisting upon it due to his hatred of the Clinton's. Clinton will not get off the ground as a serious candidate. An old woman with a shrill voice and a nonsensical message do not play well to any audience. Elizabeth Warren will rip her a new one in the primaries. Even Demo Underground not thrilled about her.

[Deborah K]

She is attempting to position herself left of Warren. I have no doubt Warren will run against her, since Obama is insisting upon it due to his hatred of the Clinton's. Clinton will not get off the ground as a serious candidate. An old woman with a shrill voice and a nonsensical message do not play well to any audience. Elizabeth Warren will rip her a new one in the primaries. Even Demo Underground not thrilled about her.

Tis true. And, here she is back-peddling on those comments. (I knew that would be forthcoming.)

http://www.marketwatch.com/(S(rnrsydaynixa5x55oiibxm45))/story/hillary-clinton-tries-to-walk-back-jobs-comments-2014-10-27



WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Hillary Clinton tried Monday to walk back some comments she made last week about job creation that landed her in hot political water.

Here’s what Clinton said in Boston on Friday at a rally for Martha Coakley, who’s running for governor of Massachusetts:

“Don’t let anybody tell you it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs,” said Clinton , who many Democrats want to see run for president.

Oops. Cue the outrage, and later, the clarification.

On Monday, Clinton said she “short-handed” her point about the failure of trickle-down economics.

More from Clinton on Monday, via Politico : “Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in America and workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up and the middle out — not when we hand out tax breaks for corporations that outsource jobs or stash their profits overseas.”

She made the comments at a campaign event in upstate New York for Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney.

It isn’t Clinton’s first gaffe in her post-secretary-of-state life. Last summer, she said her family was “dead broke” after leaving the White House in 2001, another comment she later was forced to explain. Republicans blasted her for the comment .

The risk for Clinton is that these comments stick, particularly as some liberals seek an alternative to her for the 2016 presidential race.

One such alternative is Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who was at the same rally for Coakley on Friday.

Robert Schroeder is a reporter for MarketWatch in Washington. Follow him on Twitter @mktwrobs.

[acptulsa]

'Tis a terrible, terrible thing to be trying to overcome mad cow disease and hoof-in-mouth disease at the same time...

[Anti-Neocon]

I'd like to see the whole speech. I found the following, and it sounds like she's bitching about corporatism, not free markets. But, I'd like to know if she couches this whole thing in more government control, which she probably does, because in the clip below she complains about tax cuts to corporations.
That would be rather ironic if she really were speaking against corporatism, because we all know if she became President she'd be a full-blown corporatist. I wonder how many more $300,000 Goldman speeches she plans to do in the meantime.

[Deborah K]

That would be rather ironic if she really were speaking against corporatism, because we all know if she became President she'd be a full-blown corporatist. I wonder how many more $300,000 Goldman speeches she plans to do in the meantime.

Ironic, yeah. Since she and her husband have received God knows how much money from corporations. If she didn't have double standards, she'd have no standards at all. But really, aren't they all that way? Yeah, my apathy is returning. Everyone around me is waiting with bated breath for the GOP to take back the Senate - like that's going to change anything. So, let's see, the House and Senate will be GOP, and then we get Rand in office, and then......what? Our lives will miraculously get better? I just wish people would stop thinking that they need government to make their lives better. Ain't gonna happen as long as we have the world bank, the IMF, and the Fed. THEY are in control and they will never let any government take that control away from them.

I mean, I do think it's good to have a multi-pronged approach to making the kind of changes we need to make, and electing people who are honest, and can't be black-mailed or bought, is a good thing. But, the people need to get back to basics: become self-sufficient, suspicious of government, and ready to take it on, or be ready to lose your freedom - all of it - forever.