Military Contractor Deagel forecasts US pop to decrease by 78% by 2025

[ctiger2]

250M Americans say buh bye!

http://www.deagel.com/country/United-States-of-America_c0001.aspx


Compare with China

[Intoxiklown]

Are you sure it isn't saying a population drop of 69 million instead of a total population of 69 million? I read it as a drop.

[Ronin Truth]

I'll probably be gone by then, barring some new magical health miracle(s).

[ctiger2]

Are you sure it isn't saying a population drop of 69 million instead of a total population of 69 million? I read it as a drop.

If you hover the mouse over the 69M it indicates -78%. A Population decrease of -69M on 315M would only be 21%. Remember it's just Deagle's forecasts. Doesn't mean it's going to be accurate in the end.

[Pericles]

If you hover the mouse over the 69M it indicates -78%. A Population decrease of -69M on 315M would only be 21%. Remember it's just Deagle's forecasts. Doesn't mean it's going to be accurate in the end.

And no source for the analysis - just made up numbers.

[ctiger2]

And no source for the analysis - just made up numbers.


If you scroll to the bottom of the page:

Government links & Sources

United States Coast Guard
Department of Defense
Government
United States Air Force
United States Army
United States Marine Corps
United States Navy

Sources: US Department of Defense, Department of State, CIA, World Bank and European Union.

[Ronin Truth]

I've repeatedly read that the NWO is going for somewhere around 90+% population reduction. That should provide for some much needed space and breathing room.


https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=What+is+the+optimum+population+size+of+the+USA%3 F&gbv=2&oq=What+is+the+optimum+population+size+of+the+USA% 3F&gs_l=heirloom-hp.12...11407797.11427765.0.11433062.47.16.0.2.1.0 .2563.8282.2-1j2j2j3j1j1j0j1.11.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..36.11.8282.32cS52OhsvM

[thoughtomator]

If we just start colonizing space like we should have done decades ago, there'd be plenty of room for all the humans we could possibly produce in the foreseeable future, at least long enough to figure out how to get to other solar systems.

[Zippyjuan]

I've repeatedly read that the NWO is going for somewhere around 90+% population reduction. That should provide for some much needed space and breathing room.




They have been supposedly working on that for 100 years- and still the population continues to grow.

[Ronin Truth]

They have been supposedly working on that for 100 years- and still the population continues to grow.

They are just waiting for you to doze off. :D And for the weaponized US Ebola sufficient quantity shipments to be delivered.;)

[presence]

I've never heard of them before but that's some really whack data from a website with 3000 hits/day and a clean IP trust report.


Their "forum" is also whack as hell. There's no way to join and it seems as if there is only one person sockpuppeting:




Sickle1001 (http://www.deagel.com/account/viewer.aspx?uid=u000000135)
Joined: 06 June 2005
Posts in this thread: 1
http://www.deagel.com/img/moderator.gif
Posted on 27 January 2007 9:28 PM What reason would China have for starting a war with the United States. Does it not benifit them more to ally the United States? Is oil, other resources, Taiwan, or land going to start this? Or is it the fact that both countries militaries want a convential threat? Give me your thougths.

Post Reply (http://www.deagel.com/forum/newpost.aspx?th=t20070127000001)


Hades1002 (http://www.deagel.com/account/viewer.aspx?uid=u000000275)
Joined: 03 February 2006
Posts in this thread: 1

Posted on 7 February 2007 6:59 AM China needs resources and sooner or later will get into conflict with the US. China will not attack, but it's actions will force the US to attack, given the current administration's policy.

Post Reply (http://www.deagel.com/forum/newpost.aspx?th=t20070127000001)


Silver1010 (http://www.deagel.com/account/viewer.aspx?uid=u000000525)
Joined: 14 March 2007
Posts in this thread: 1

Posted on 14 March 2007 9:22 AM China may not have much to gain by engaging the USA directly in the near future - but keep in mind that investors like to invest in strength. If China can appear to be strong enough to challenge the US, it increases their influence in the World.

Let's not forget that China is still Communist China and it is obvious to anyone, who doesn't have his head in his butt, that China intends to keep on being communist - "reform" is a ruse to comfort stupid business leaders that are intent on pouring their investment dollars into Communist China. We better wake up soon - China's greatest weapon against the US is our own greed.

Post Reply (http://www.deagel.com/forum/newpost.aspx?th=t20070127000001)


Sampson1007 (http://www.deagel.com/account/viewer.aspx?uid=u000000552)
Joined: 24 August 2007
Posts in this thread: 1

Posted on 24 August 2007 3:46 PM The united states and china are competing for resources, and that will definitely bring conflict. Also remember, the u.s. owes china money, a lot of money, it is probably worried that the u.s. will default. However I believe that the military tensions are all posing, china's economy could not survive without the United states business.







Seems to me they're some kind of hub for "China is taking over the world" fears; wreaks of CIA PSYOP; feel dirty having thumbed through.

[presence]

If you scroll to the bottom of the page:

Government links & Sources

United States Coast Guard
Department of Defense
Government
United States Air Force
United States Army
United States Marine Corps
United States Navy

Sources: US Department of Defense, Department of State, CIA, World Bank and European Union.

LOLZZZZ

Those are hardly what I would call biblographic "citations".


Maybe I should add that list to my signature line so everybody believes me too?

[Spikender]

Their "forum" is also whack as hell. There's no way to join and it seems as if there is only one person sockpuppeting:

LOL

But you're right, kind of spooky. The usernames all have the same format and there's obvious similarities between the writing styles with minor changes to grammar and punctuation.

As for the stats in question, it seems to fit in snugly with that scientific study that found that 2 Billion pop would be "optimal" for the planet.

[Pericles]

If you scroll to the bottom of the page:

Government links & Sources

United States Coast Guard
Department of Defense
Government
United States Air Force
United States Army
United States Marine Corps
United States Navy

Sources: US Department of Defense, Department of State, CIA, World Bank and European Union.


Did you click on any of those links?

[HOLLYWOOD]

Well, the schizophrenics better make up their minds...

You either keep increasing the population of "Milk Cows" for the government tax ticks to suck the life blood out for their PONZI and PYRAMID schemes,(which require ever increasing front-end blood) or you turn them into "Beef" and kill off your problems to start over.

I have my ticket to a DUMP & the future 'Lebensraum' ...do you?

[Inkblots]

From their homepage:


For those who might be concerned.

The countries forecast has been out there for over a decade. It is updated annually using the latest available information and is provided AS IS. Obviously, at this point, predicts a Western collapse.

It's just more ridiculous Malthusian doomsaying, of course. Terribly serious people have been predicting Western population collapse more or less seriously for going on 3 centuries, now. They will continue to be disappointed.

[Ronin Truth]

I kinda doubt that 5% of the world population (US) can be allowed to continue to consume 25% of the world's resources (them), ad infinitum.

[ctiger2]

Did you click on any of those links?

I didn't. I'm just the messenger. Completely disregard it if that's what you desire. I Don't care. I just found it interesting is all. That's it.