PDA

View Full Version : Rubio to Introduce Legislation to Ban Travel from Ebola Stricken Nations




Miss Annie
10-20-2014, 06:25 PM
I believe this is just common sense and should have been done with Grayson called for it in July.

Rubio to Introduce Legislation to Ban Travel from Ebola Stricken Nations


See full article here (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/20/Rubio-To-Introduce-Legislation-To-Ban-Travel-From-Ebola-Stricken-Nations)

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) plans to introduce a bill that he says would ban visa issuance to people from Ebola-stricken nations in West Africa.

“While Ebola’s deadly reach has proven to be a complex and unique international challenge, the many uncertainties surrounding this virus continue to threaten U.S. national security,” Rubio said in a statement announcing the legislation. “Our biggest priority is ensuring that sufficient safeguards are in place to limit the spread of Ebola, contain it at the source, and protect Americans.”

Rubio added that “common sense restrictions on travel” from Ebola-stricken nations are a must at this time:

We must take any and all necessary precautions to contain this virus – and common sense restrictions on travel from countries now confronting this epidemic is an important step. The most effective way to combat this deadly virus is to address it at its source. This ban on issuance of visas does not mean we will be completely cutting off the affected countries from the outside world. We must continue to increase our assistance to those countries as they struggle to contain this outbreak. That is, ultimately, the only way we will be able to stop this outbreak and keep Americans safe from this horrible disease.

The effort comes as Rubio continues to rehabilitate his image on immigration after spending the first half of 2013 pushing the “Gang of Eight” immigration bill through the Senate. After Rubio saw a dive in the polls because of the effort to push amnesty, he worked to kill his own bill’s chances in the House by coming out against a conference committee strategy House GOP leadership was considering using to pass it through that chamber—and now he doesn’t support comprehensive immigration reform and only supports piecemeal immigration reform.

While the text of the bill isn’t publicly available yet, if it contains what Rubio says it contains—and doesn’t have any extra add-ons that are unpopular—the Ebola travel ban bill could help Rubio regain some support from the populist right that he lost in the 2013 amnesty debate.

Rubio’s office said the senator plans to introduce the bill when the Senate returns next month.

The bill also offers a major opportunity for Republicans challenging Democrats for U.S. Senate seats on the campaign trail this year in the final weeks before the crucial 2014 midterm elections on Nov. 4. In New Hampshire, former Sen. Scott Brown has called for a travel ban from Ebola-stricken nations—actually going as far as writing incumbent Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) a personal letter asking her to back such a ban too. Brown wrote to Shaheen this weekend:

I believe that one way to prevent and contain this disease is by enacting a travel ban to and from West African countries that are infected with this virus, and imposing an embargo on the issuance of visas to people in countries where the virus is prevalent,” Brown wrote to Shaheen this weekend. “This step goes beyond partisan politics, as there is a growing and bipartisan coalition of lawmakers in Congress in favor of it. So far, more than 70 members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have come out in favor of a temporary travel ban. Travel bans have proved successful in stopping Ebola in West African countries that are much closer to the disease outbreak than we are here in the United States. A travel ban such as the one I've described would prevent more people coming here like Thomas Eric Duncan, who arrived from Liberia with Ebola and transmitted it to two nurses in Texas before dying.

Shaheen hasn’t responded at all—and hasn’t indicated one way or the other on whether she’d support a travel ban.

In North Carolina, GOP U.S. Senate candidate Thom Tillis has aggressively fought for a travel ban—and after initially opposing a ban on travel, incumbent Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC) has flip-flopped into now supporting a travel ban.

“Keeping the American people safe must be our nation’s top priority, and the White House should immediately ban travel from Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea to contain the spread of Ebola,” Tillis, North Carolina’s House Speaker, said in early October.

After initially dismissing any calls for a travel ban, saying last week at a news conference in Charlotte that such a ban “is not going to help solve this problem” and “that’s not going to contain the epidemic that we see happening in Africa” Hagan has reversed course and now supports a travel ban.

Hagan said late last week according to the Huffington Post:

I have said for weeks that travel restrictions should be one part of a broad strategy to prevent Ebola from spreading in the U.S. and fighting it in Africa. I am calling on the Administration to temporarily ban the travel of non-U.S. citizens from the affected countries in West Africa. Although stopping the spread of this virus overseas will require a large, coordinated effort with the international community, a temporary travel ban is a prudent step the President can take to protect the American people, and I believe he should do so immediately.

In a series of press releases over the past several days, Tillis’ campaign has ripped Hagan for flip-flopping on the issue—something Hagan denies having done.

Louisiana Democratic incumbent Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) doesn’t support a travel ban, her spokesperson told the Huffington Post, but wants Obama’s administration “to expand the current screenings from five to all 20 airports in the United States where tourists, international workers, and business leaders from West Africa arrive.”

Both Landrieu’s GOP opponents support a travel ban. The Tea Party-backed Col. Rob Maness said in an Oct. 16 press release that Gov. Bobby Jindal was “right" when he was one of the first to call for a travel ban. Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), the current frontrunner GOP candidate there in a race that’s almost certain to head to a runoff, as Cassidy, Landrieu, and Maness are each not likely to get 50 percent on Nov. 4, said that Obama “was wrong when he said it was unlikely that Ebola would reach the U.S.— several Americans have been diagnosed with Ebola.”

“In addition to other preventative measures, we must stop commercial flights between the U.S. and countries affected by Ebola and ensure health care providers from the U.S. and elsewhere put protocols in place. I will continue to push the Obama Administration to have a comprehensive plan of action to protect Louisiana families,” Cassidy, who is also a doctor, said in a statement provided to Breitbart News.

Obama is continuing avoiding a travel ban, but he also resisted the appointment of a single point person to handle the Ebola response before eventually caving to congressional Republicans' demands on that—even though the person he appointed, Ron Klain, has been roundly criticized as a partisan political hack by Republicans.

As Republicans keep hammering this point home, and vulnerable Democrats like Hagan and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) jump on board—especially now with a forthcoming legislative vehicle thanks to Rubio—the issue is almost certain to get talked about more on the campaign trail. Republicans are likely to hammer Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, too, for not calling the Senate back to debate and vote on Rubio’s bill—or other legislative solutions—while vulnerable Democrats campaign for their political future through Nov. 4.

Iowa State Sen. Joni Ernst, in an op-ed for Breitbart News, endorsed Rubio’s bill, saying that Congress and the Obama administration are “failing” the American people on Ebola. Ernst wrote:

The State Department should impose a temporary travel ban for civilians traveling in and out of countries that have high levels of infection, with an exception for health care and other aid workers who are bravely volunteering in West Africa. We should issue a ban on new visas for nationals of Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, and put a hold on the as many as 13,000 U.S. visas already issued in those countries that have not been used for travel. The Federal government must also continue to increase health screenings at our international airports and encourage our European partners to do the same, since travelers from effected countries transit through major European airports. We should also implement standard protocols at hospitals across the U.S. to quickly identify, isolate and treat potential Ebola patients.

Ernst added that Rubio’s legislation “would go a long way towards keeping Ebola out of the U.S. Congress also has important oversight and funding functions to play,” and that “Congress should immediately return to Washington” to pass it or a travel ban bill like it.”

UPDATE: Shaheen has flip-flopped and now supports a travel ban, according to NECN's Alison King.

invisible
10-20-2014, 07:39 PM
Why did Rand, Amash, Massie, etc, etc let the rube beat them all to it? A Liberty Candidate could have scored easy points here, and kept the rube from doing anything that makes him look good going into the upcoming Presidential election cycle.

navy-vet
10-20-2014, 07:50 PM
If ebola should assume a foothold in the lower Americas or Mexico, we will be in big trouble.
If it should mutate into the deadliest form and / or become airborne, we would be totally screwed, economically and freedom wise.
That, I do believe might just end up being the game point.

mczerone
10-20-2014, 07:53 PM
Ban travel from Houston!

Ban commercial airlines!

Travel by horse only!

Even better, by foot only!

Mandatory ICE checkpoints in every town with a 20 day waiting list to enter!

It's the only way to protect our Nation!

mczerone
10-20-2014, 07:54 PM
Why did Rand, Amash, Massie, etc, etc let the rube beat them all to it? A Liberty Candidate could have scored easy points here, and kept the rube from doing anything that makes him look good going into the upcoming Presidential election cycle.

Gov't restrictions don't really meet the definition of "Liberty"

navy-vet
10-20-2014, 07:55 PM
I totally agree with Miss Annie, and as I have stated in the past, the securing of our southern perimeter is also an essential element of isolating us from harmful pathogens as well as threats of other flavors.

Brett85
10-20-2014, 08:17 PM
Rubio may be correct on the substance of his position, but couldn't you argue that taking this position makes Rubio an "isolationist?" A travel ban strikes me as being more isolationist than calling someone an isolationist because they don't support every single war overseas, which Rubio constantly does.

John F Kennedy III
10-20-2014, 08:42 PM
Rubio may be correct on the substance of his position, but couldn't you argue that taking this position makes Rubio an "isolationist?" A travel ban strikes me as being more isolationist than calling someone an isolationist because they don't support every single war overseas, which Rubio constantly does.

But that would be opposite of FOX NEWS logic.

Antischism
10-20-2014, 08:54 PM
As I stated in the other topic:

Curious, were people very vocal and angrily calling for travel bans during the H1N1 (284,000 + deaths worldwide) and SARS outbreaks? Those were much more contagious (airborne) and we seem to have gotten them under control. In fact, I can't recall any blanket travel bans ever occurring in the United States. There were travel bans in other countries in regards to SARS, but they proved to be both costly and ineffective.

People are also aware that there are no direct flights from the three most affected regions in Africa, correct? Because there are congressmen who were oblivious to this fact. So what exactly would a travel ban do? What regions would we ban travel from? How would you stop people from "illegally" getting in? Wouldn't this make it much more difficult to track those who potentially have Ebola? I'm struggling to see the benefits (only one I can imagine is people would feel 'safer') of this. So what happens when we get people who manage to come into the country with Ebola despite a travel ban, and who refuse to be honest because they knowingly "violated" the ban?

This seems counterproductive.

navy-vet
10-20-2014, 09:25 PM
As a former medical practitioner and educator I fully recognize and appreciate the value of quarantine procedure in curtailing the spread of disease. It really does work, much better in fact than questioning a traveler about exposure or taking temps. I do not however advocate any measures of this sort to be placed on an indefinite basis as seems to be the implication by some.

navy-vet
10-20-2014, 09:34 PM
As for your lack of concern in these regards Antischism, be aware that if there is a breakout, odds I would think are that it most likely would begin in your area, as I understand NY is taking in 150 travelers from the West Coast of Africa daily.

I heard today that your first responders and port authority personnel are pitching a royal union bitch and will likely walk off the job at the first sign of an outbreak, leaving you to fend for yourselves for a few days until obama sends in the calvary...oh wait, there isn't one.

navy-vet
10-20-2014, 09:42 PM
I want you to know Antischism, as much disdain as I have for your place of residence, I hope that the a fore mentioned scenario never happens. But, I can't help recalling many moons back, when I was a wee lad, that the lights went out there, and all hell was unleashed. Just be ready and watch your back, at least you needn't worry about keeping your powder dry anymore, since they don't allow you to keep any.