PDA

View Full Version : OR-Man beaten, shocked with Taser by Portland police awarded $562,000 by jury




Anti Federalist
10-06-2014, 10:09 AM
Man beaten, shocked with Taser by Portland police awarded $562,000 by jury

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/09/portland_jury_awards_to_man_be.html

A jury on Monday awarded more than $562,000 to a man Portland police knocked face-down to the ground and repeatedly pummeled and zapped with a Taser.

In doing so, jurors 9-3 gave Jason Matthew Cox every penny he had sought. Jurors found Portland police committed a battery against Cox, who was 37 at the time of the June 28, 2011, incident.

Cox, now 40, testified during the five-day trial that he thought he was going to be beaten to death as Officers Jeffrey Elias, Robert Bruders and Sarah Kerwin took him into custody in a Southeast Portland parking lot under suspicion of drunken driving.

Cox said the verdict will change his life. "Fantastic," Cox said, summing up how he was feeling.

He hugged his Portland attorneys Greg and Jason Kafoury.

"The Portland police are a law unto themselves," Greg Kafoury said. "These officers will not be disciplined. ...In the past 50 years, no Portland police officer has ever lost their job for physically abusing a citizen."

As jurors left the Multnomah County Circuit courtroom, they shook Cox's hand.

"Sorry this happened to you," Justin Browning, a juror and Southeast Portland resident, told Cox. "It must be vindication. I know you've been through a lot."

Browning said he hoped the verdict led to better training of police.

Cox and experts testified during trial that police irreparably injured his shoulder, meaning he could no longer work as an ironworker, a job in which he earned $33 an hour.

Portland police contended Cox was argumentative, furrowed his brow, tensed his muscles, wasn’t following police orders and appeared to want to fight as he resisted being handcuffed. He had consumed 32 ounces of Red Bull and vodka on an empty stomach that night, and his blood alcohol content three hours after the incident was .078 percent.

Cox and his attorneys, however, pointed to surveillance video that -- unbeknownst to police during the encounter -- recorded Elias and Bruders taking Cox to the ground and punching him in the head at least a half a dozen times.

A third officer, Kerwin, shocked Cox with a Taser four times in about 30 seconds -- for a cumulative total of about 20 seconds of electricity cycling through Cox’s body.

Meanwhile, the video shows Cox didn’t swing at the officers.

Cox said he hoped the incident -- which by chance was captured by surveillance camera -- would push the city to require that all officers wear video cameras that would hold them more accountable.

"Body cameras, please," Cox said. "Body cameras."

The officers testified that their use of force was justified because Cox would not take his hands out from under his body in order to be handcuffed. Cox said that while he had been standing, he had cooperated by placing his hands behind his back in order to be cuffed, but instead, police took him to the ground.

Cox also told jurors he placed his hands in front of him to break his fall when taken to the ground. After that, he was in too much pain from the blows to the head and stuns from the Taser to be aware of what was happening, he said.

Cox's attorneys said that police were annoyed with him because he'd tried to talk himself out of being arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants. When Cox said he told one of the officers to go easy on a shoulder that he'd previously injured in the past, the officer yanked it up.

Browning, the juror, said that appears from the video that the yank appeared to have caused Cox to step forward in pain. And that prompted police to react by taking him to the ground, saying he was resisting, Browning said.

"He had his hands behind his back," Browning said. "They could have just cuffed him there and sat him in their car."

Dan Roberts, another juror, agreed that the video was a crucial piece of evidence.

"Mr. Cox did not appear to present a threat," said Roberts, of Gresham. "He looked pretty compliant to me."

Roberts also said he gave weight to a report written by a Portland Fire & Rescue paramedic who showed up to the scene and noted that officers were strangely tight-lipped around him. The paramedic wrote in his report that "police on scene very reluctant to give any info how (patient) was injured..."

Jurors deliberated about 4 1/2 hours before reaching their verdict.

Jurors awarded Cox $128,991 for lost wages and future earning capacity, $33,138 for medical bills that included shoulder surgery and $400,000 for pain and suffering.

After the verdict, Mayor Charlie Hales offered this statement Monday:

"While we don’t agree with the verdict, we appreciate the jury’s time and consideration of the evidence, and we respect the court’s process. Since the incident occurred in June 2011, the Police Bureau has changed its use-of-force policies and training to refocus on de-escalation. Mayor Hales is continuing to work with the bureau to improve relations with the community."

aGameOfThrones
10-06-2014, 10:48 AM
After the verdict, Mayor Charlie Hales offered this statement Monday:

"While we don’t agree with the verdict, we appreciate the jury’s time and consideration of the evidence, and we respect the court’s process. Since the incident occurred in June 2011, the Police Bureau has changed its use-of-force policies and training to refocus on de-escalation. Mayor Hales is continuing to work with the bureau to improve relations with the community."


New policies:


*make sure there are no cameras around.


End.


not enough FFoCs on the jury.

JK/SEA
10-06-2014, 11:08 AM
500k..?...not enough.

KCIndy
10-06-2014, 11:24 AM
Portland police contended Cox was argumentative, furrowed his brow, tensed his muscles, wasn’t following police orders and appeared to want to fight as he resisted being handcuffed.


"Furrowed his brow?" That's the best lie the cops can come up with? Un-freakin'-believable.

And I'm guessing the officers involved were awarded... err... "punished" with a couple weeks of paid vacation. Of course, the tab for the half million dollar settlement will be picked up by the taxpayers.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: This crap isn't going to end until the cops who perpetrated the assault are forced to pay the damages out of their own pocket.

donnay
10-06-2014, 11:28 AM
Law enforcement hates jury nullification. The cops should be in jail too.

KCIndy
10-06-2014, 01:12 PM
Law enforcement hates jury nullification. The cops should be in jail too.


I agree 100%.... but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting. :(

Warrior_of_Freedom
10-06-2014, 01:15 PM
police have never protected me from any crime in my life, but they sure as hell have no problem trying to give me bullshit traffic tickets

aGameOfThrones
10-06-2014, 02:37 PM
police have never protected me from any crime in my life, but they sure as hell have no problem trying to give me bullshit traffic tickets


it's better to have them and not need them than to not have them and need them.



http://media.topito.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/code-31.gif

Jackie Moon
10-06-2014, 04:28 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVlH0NsMr9o&list=UUXN7rPhZK6Rp8lMhvpSri_Q



As a side note - never agree to take a field sobriety test.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-cuLyVRTso

phill4paul
10-06-2014, 05:12 PM
"These officers will not be disciplined. ...In the past 50 years, no Portland police officer has ever lost their job for physically abusing a citizen."

You got that right. What KCIndy said. Outta reps for ya bud.

Anti Federalist
10-06-2014, 05:18 PM
As a side note - never agree to take a field sobriety test.

And in an increasing number of states, this is what happens next:

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/forced-blood-draw_3.jpg

You get manhandled onto a gurney by however many cops it takes and they stick you.

Unless, of course, you've decided that you are just not going to let theme arrest you today.

With everything that phrase entails...

phill4paul
10-06-2014, 05:38 PM
And in an increasing number of states, this is what happens next:

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/forced-blood-draw_3.jpg

You get manhandled onto a gurney by however many cops it takes and they stick you.

Unless, of course, you've decided that you are just not going to let theme arrest you today.

With everything that phrase entails...

Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. With everything that entails.

Jackie Moon
10-06-2014, 06:01 PM
And in an increasing number of states, this is what happens next:

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/forced-blood-draw_3.jpg

You get manhandled onto a gurney by however many cops it takes and they stick you.

Unless, of course, you've decided that you are just not going to let theme arrest you today.

With everything that phrase entails...

Oh yeah, I agree. If they want your blood they're going to do whatever it takes to get it.

I just meant the "walk the line, stand on one leg, say the alphabet backwards" field sobriety tests.

There's a 50-50 chance you fail that even completely sober. That news story talked about a study where officers watched videos of people taking the test and only guessed right 50% of the time.

As usual with police, they don't tell you that they're only asking and that you can say no. They make it sound like if you do it they'll let you go... when really they're just looking for one minor slip up that gives them a reason to arrest you.

Maybe you step on a rock, or you don't understand their directions, or you have bad balance... but all the jury sees is a video of you stumbling.

So even if they arrest you anyways it's better to refuse the test without giving them evidence that will be used against you in a trial.

phill4paul
10-06-2014, 06:17 PM
Oh yeah, I agree. If they want your blood they're going to do whatever it takes to get it.

Die. That's what they'll do. And kill. That's what they do. No one is ever going to forcefully extract blood from my living body.


I just meant the "walk the line, stand on one leg, say the alphabet backwards" field sobriety tests.

There's a 50-50 chance you fail that even completely sober. That news story talked about a study where officers watched videos of people taking the test and only guessed right 50% of the time.

As usual with police, they don't tell you that they're only asking and that you can say no. They make it sound like if you do it they'll let you go... when really they're just looking for one minor slip up that gives them a reason to arrest you.

Maybe you step on a rock, or you don't understand their directions, or you have bad balance... but all the jury sees is a video of you stumbling.

So even if they arrest you anyways it's better to refuse the test without giving them evidence that will be used against you in a trial.

Yep, just don't do the monkey dance. Depends on your state. You might lose the privilege of riding the kings highways but there is nothing forcing you.

HOLLYWOOD
10-06-2014, 06:48 PM
As a side note - never agree to take a field sobriety test.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unseSFWjuqs&src_vid=-0MXU3J6Qbs&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_183 855&html5=1

jjdoyle
10-06-2014, 07:18 PM
Based on how much he was making an hour, and his age, the amount asked for and awarded seems low to me. Especially when you factor in his lawyers will get around 1/3rd.

I wonder how he/they came to the amount asked?

ChristianAnarchist
10-06-2014, 08:17 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unseSFWjuqs&src_vid=-0MXU3J6Qbs&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_183 855&html5=1

Damn that's FUNNY !!