Whistle-blower : Hillary Clinton's staff told to hide Benghazi documents

[enhanced_deficit]

Hillary Clinton's staff told to hide any documents that could make her inner circle look bad in aftermath of Benghazi, whistle-blower claims



An Accountability Review Board demanded documents related to the 2012 Benghazi terror attack but the most important details were kept from them
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary says weekend boiler-room scramble 'separated' papers that might reflect badly on Hillary Clinton
He was scapegoated, he claims, and told by a State Department's ombudsman: 'It’s not about you; it’s about Hillary and 2016'
Obama administration says charges are 'totally without merit'; congressman says special Benghazi committee will 'dive deep'




Published: 09:59 EST, 15 September 2014

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/09/15/1410793664061_wps_10_Raymond_Maxwell.jpg

Raymond Maxwell was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs when al-Qaeda-linked militants stormed a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya and killed four Americans

U.S. State Department officials conspired to prevent an internal Accountability Review Board from seeing damning documents after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack which made then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton look bad, according to a former senior diplomat.
A picture has emerged of a weekend boiler-room operation in which employees were instructed to sift through boxes of documents and 'pull out' anything that might make Clinton or her close associates look bad in the wake of the terrorist murders of four Americans including the ambassador to Libya.
Raymond Maxwell, a former deputy assistant secretary for Near Eastern affairs, claims he was scapegoated after the raid by militants acting with Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamist terror faction linked with al-Qaeda.
He told The Daily Signal, a news outlet operated by the conservative Heritage Foundation, that a room in the basement of the State Department was converted to a makeshift document review center on a weekend, supervised by Clinton confidants.

'I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon,' Maxwell said.

Inside, says Maxwell, employees – including one who reported to him – busily covering up information that suggested higher-ups were responsible for the lax security at the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi Libya.

SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/09/15/1410793784907_wps_11_The_U_S_Consulate_in_Beng.jpg


Maxwell claims State Department higher-ups close to then-Secretary Hillary Clinton worked over a weekend to scrub boxes of documents of anything that might make her look bad, before giving them to investigators


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/09/15/1410793316877_wps_7_INDIANOLA_IA_SEPTEMBER_14.jpg
+5


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, shown Sunday at a political event in Iowa, was officially cleared of wrongdoing by an internal review board, even though it never interviewed her



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2756601/State-Department-conducted-basement-operation-damaging-information-Benghazi-review-board-claims-former-senior-diplomat.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2756601/State-Department-conducted-basement-operation-damaging-information-Benghazi-review-board-claims-former-senior-diplomat.html#ixzz3DRYwBmX3)



Related

Clinton aide's idea: Let Iraq shoot down US plane (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?459860-Clinton-aide-s-idea-Let-Iraq-shoot-down-US-plane&)

Are there sufficient and compelling offenses by President Obama to impeach him? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?454650-Are-there-sufficient-and-compelling-offenses-by-President-Obama-to-impeach-him&)
Is team Obama pushing Boko Haram girls news to distract attention from Benghazi investigation? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?451851-Is-team-Obama-pushing-Boko-Haram-girls-news-to-distract-attention-from-Benghazi-investigation&)

[invisible]

Hopefully he was able to get copies made of the incriminating stuff.

[phill4paul]

Hopefully he was able to get copies made of the incriminating stuff.

I'm thinking everything now is government psy-ops. "Whistle-blower" does this or that. No proof comes out. Critics are silence.

[enhanced_deficit]

If he did, probably won't come until after bubba has vetted Hillary and she announces her 2016 run.

In other news:

Greta: Obama Administration Tried to Pressure Me Over Fox Colleague's Benghazi Story

Let's go "Off the Record." Since day one of Benghazi, Fox News has aggressively investigated. It hasn't been easy. It's been more like pulling teeth trying to get answers from the Obama administration. The Obama administration's behavior post-Benghazi has been weird, like they are hiding something. First, that silly story about that video. Remember Susan Rice on all the Sunday talk shows, and even President Obama, kept talking about the video for weeks. So, Fox continued to press for information and it got weirder.
Remember the days right after the attack, the State Department had a conference call to brief all in the media -- and excluded Fox News? When confronted, the State Department apologized and said it was oversight.

But that's not all. A few weeks later, when reporter Jennifer Griffin said she was told that there was a stand down order at Benghazi, I got a weird call from the Obama administration trying to pressure me to get Jennifer to back down on her report. I thought the call from the Obama administration was dirty. Incidentally, I don't control my colleagues and they don't control me.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/09/09/greta-obama-administration-tried-pressure-me-over-fox-colleagues-benghazi-story

[TheCount]

Hopefully he was able to get copies made of the incriminating stuff.

The fact that he's talking to the Heritage Foundation rather than any of the dozen serious news organizations that would be extraordinarily eager to get their hands on this information indicates that he has no proof or legitimacy.

[enhanced_deficit]

The fact that he's talking to the Heritage Foundation rather than any of the dozen serious news organizations that would be extraordinarily eager to get their hands on this information indicates that he has no proof or legitimacy.

Speaking of indications, what does this indicate? Who no one talks of that video anymore?

"..Susan Rice on all the Sunday talk shows, and even President Obama, kept talking about the video for weeks"