PDA

View Full Version : Fred Reed: Unstable Weimar America




Lucille
08-07-2014, 10:19 AM
We know it's going to implode (http://blog.independent.org/2009/11/02/can-the-rampaging-leviathan-be-stopped-or-slowed/). Can't stop it. What comes after is the question. Knowing Boobus, it won't be good. All we can do is try to build up the Remnant (http://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/06/thomas-woods/ron-pauls-task/). Remember, all we need is 10% (http://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902)!

http://www.fredoneverything.net/Unstable.shtml


Unstable countries are unstable, this not always being obvious in those countries, and then comes a man on a horse. The United States, methinks, is not particularly stable.

That anything seismic might happen is an idea doubtless inconceivable to most Americans, who still remember the America of Reader’s Digest, but is daily less improbable. Weimar America is not stable. The cracks in the foundations, the social crumbling and virulent antipathies grow daily more evident.

The economy declines, jobs leave for other climes, the petroyuan looms, college graduates crushed by debt find no work, the middle class shrinks, and the young begin to live perforce with their parents. Times of diminishing expectations are dangerous.
[...]
America can no longer be called a democracy. The Constitution recedes in memory. Congress and the Supreme Court amount to nothing. Washington rests uneasily in the hands of a half-mad clique of geopolitical illiterates, warlike misfires playing dangerous games like little Kaiser Wilhelms in a sandbox. Presiding over the city is Septimius Severus, Bokassa III, a negligible pol from Chicago who doesn’t like whites or understand European norms of government. He will keep the borders open and civil liberties in retreat.

A sort of insanity rules, warning of stress building along many political San Andreas faults waiting for the Big One. A pathologically aggressive United States bombs countries almost at random while little boys are dragged from school in handcuffs for pointing a finger and saying “Bang.” Girls suffer from bulimia and anorexia, lunacies nonexistent in psychically healthy societies. A crack-brained feminism makes cockamamie circuses of the universities. Bastardy runs at a perilous thirty percent among white women, verging on cultural disintegration, and seventy percent among blacks. The epicene young grow in sheltered, meaningless hothouse-suburbs, never having worked, baited a hook, been in a schoolyard fight, or existed outside of a feckless bored helplessness.
[...]
In times like these arises a yearning for a strong man to sweep away the filth, banish the disorder, and restore a possibly existent former Elysium. Such desires usually involve assertion of the national myths, in this case of the brave, self-reliant, and clean-living Davy Crockett and the immaculately wholesome small towns of Norman Rockwell. These never were, which doesn’t matter. The America of 1960 came much closer than what we now have.

And so a strong man arises from somewhere. With luck you end up with Lee Kuan Yew instead of Mussolini or, worse, that dark squatty effeminate blond Aryan superman of the Beer Hall Putsch. Unfortunately you can’t tell who you have got until after you have got him.
[...]
In America, something is going to happen. It will not happen just now. Things are not yet bad enough. Wait. Whether it will be a continued slow sinking into an internally chaotic semi-bushworld status, or a serious war with Russia and China started by brain-burnt sexagenarian adolescents in Congress and pasty neocons with Napoleonic fantasies, or a coup by the military, or something else, I don’t know. A Pentagonal coup d’état does not seem likely, granted. Our generals are not greatly political as long as they get their toys and wars, and they lack the doughty moralism of a Hindenburg or Ludendorff.

In practical terms, though, four helicopter gunships and twenty Black Hawks of troops arriving over Washington from Quantico would do it. Whether the public would care enough to do anything about it, or whether there would be anything they could do, is uncertain. Enough people are sick enough of the current state of things that they might say, what the hell, give it a try. The crucial question world then be how the rest of the military would respond.

I'm guessing conservatives would love to give a military dictatorship a try.

Deborah K
08-07-2014, 10:51 AM
Not all conservatives, by any stretch. Consider Joel Skousen for example. He is the nephew of conservative Cleon Skousen, who wrote the books: Naked Capitalist; Naked Communist; and Five Thousand Year Leap. Although Mormon, Joel voted for Ron Paul, instead of Mitt Romney, for which he took heat. He wrote a great book called: Strategic Relocation. Here's some info on it:


Strategic Relocation—Third Edition. The long-awaited, all-new third edition is now in print and available for purchase. In this edition we have updated and expanded our analysis of the threats facing North America and include our opinion of popular overseas tax-havens and expatriate colonies. We have added over 200 pages of in-depth analysis of each US state and the populated regions in Canada. New graphics and color maps show specific threats and recommended relocation areas. Maps include military targets, population densities, satellite images of terrain features, private vs. public land availability and much, much more.

In today's bookstores, it's easy to find information about the "best places" to live. Such literature undoubtedly will concentrate on the positive aspects of life, such as numbers and ratings of golf courses, doctor/patient ratios, warm sunny climates, availability of cultural activities, status of educational institutions and the growth potential of the local economy.

But while these highly-rated metropolitan areas may offer ample opportunities to enhance your lifestyle, what happens when a major crisis strikes? What if:

a labor crisis halts the inflow of food and business goods? Will these communities provide the basic necessities of life?
an economic crisis that threatens your pensions, investments and other so-called "guaranteed" income?
a major earthquake or other natural disaster suddenly upsets the natural social order for months at a time? Could you get out of harm's way if massive social unrest erupts in the wake of a crisis?
an emergency clogs the area's freeways? Do you have contingency plans to exit the area?
the "unthinkable" happens: nuclear war? Or have you thought about the potential of a major terrorist attack on a U.S. city with chemical or biological weapons?
It's easy to dismiss these threats during times of peace and prosperity, but they are real. Not only that, but the probability of such events coming to pass increases every year. Strategic Relocation: North American Guide to Safe Places is an in-depth analysis of North America's safest places to live. This book will help you look ahead for potential threats that most other people fail to see or choose to ignore. It contains a complete discussion of the strategies and relocation contingencies that will help you avoid or mitigate each of the major modern threats, from national disasters to economic collapse to nuclear war.

As a relocation expert, Joel Skousen also offers personal paid consultations for those who want advice on selecting land or working out special contingency retreat plans. He recommends that anyone interested in these services read the book first. Contact Mr. Skousen at joel at joelskousen.com to talk about the book or for consultation. No appointment is necessary.

Lucille
08-07-2014, 11:25 AM
Yeah, I should have said "plenty of conservatives," or "certain factions of conservatives." I believe all neo-conservatives would.