PDA

View Full Version : All Quiet on the Eastern Front




Brian4Liberty
07-18-2014, 07:31 AM
All Quiet on the Eastern Front

Was the Ukrainian Air War being ignored?

July 18, 2014
by Brian4Liberty

(RPF) - The tragedy of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 has once again turned the spotlight on problems in the Ukraine, but the conflict itself is old news. Or perhaps it would have been more accurate to have called the ongoing civil war in Ukraine a non-news event.

With the terrible loss of a civilian aircraft, the battles being waged in eastern Ukraine can no longer be ignored. News reports now openly talk about Ukrainian government military aircraft being shot down in the past, but the use of air-power against the residents of Eastern Ukraine has been sparsely reported by the western media, if at all.

As with Libya before the Benghazi incident, is this another case of a western supported regime change going sour, with a similar hesitation to report the bad news or admit to the dangerous conditions? Would it call into question the position of the Obama Administration and the supposed success in Ukraine?

Events can be spun many ways. Often it is the media which decides whether a story should be reported, and whether it should be characterized as good or bad, success or failure. And when it comes to the Ukraine, as is usually the case in conflicts, there are two very different possible narratives.

On the one hand, the ongoing government offensive is simply a military action against the “separatists“, “rebels”, “insurgents” or “terrorists”.

On the other hand, the residents of eastern Ukraine see this as a military attack on civilians by a government that no longer represents them.

In the words of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko (http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/07/01/urkaine-crisis-idINKBN0F63EG20140701), the goal of the Ukrainian government is to “to free our land from dirt and parasites (http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/07/01/urkaine-crisis-idINKBN0F63EG20140701)”. One can imagine how the story could be spun if the west was not supporting this new regime, especially considering how many people have been forced to flee their homes, possibly to never return. Luckily for President Poroshenko, we only demonize our enemies.

So the story of the Ukraine civil war had been demoted to back page news, if it made the news at all. Perhaps not taking a side is the best option, especially from an unbiased, objective reporting perspective. But there is one possible side effect of ignoring this conflict. Did downplaying a war zone, with active air warfare occurring, lead to complacency for commercial airlines?

Almost immediately after the tragedy, it was reported that the FAA had already issued an advisory to commercial aircraft to avoid the area where Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 was lost. But it turns out, that wasn’t exactly true. The original FAA Notice to Airman (NOTAM) only restricted the airspace "over the Crimean region of Ukraine and adjacent areas of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov (http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=16655)". It did not address the danger of the active air war over eastern Ukraine. A new FAA advisory (http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=16655) was issued July 17th, after the loss of MH17.

As with every tragedy, there will be accusations, finger pointing, calls for justice and calls for change. Perhaps one prudent change will be for the airline industry to take very seriously active conflict zones with aircraft being shot down, whether it is being reported on non-stop, or not at all.

asurfaholic
07-18-2014, 07:45 AM
This article didnt make any sense to me. Seems the author is just pointing out that there are two sides of the story, but seems to take as many words as he can to say so.

Or maybe I'm having trouble focusing...

CPUd
07-18-2014, 07:52 AM
Quite?

JK/SEA
07-18-2014, 07:55 AM
Quite?

quite right ol' chap...

Brian4Liberty
07-18-2014, 09:07 AM
Quite?

Quite a quiet quit. ;)

Brian4Liberty
07-18-2014, 09:13 AM
This article didnt make any sense to me. Seems the author is just pointing out that there are two sides of the story, but seems to take as many words as he can to say so.

Or maybe I'm having trouble focusing...

Probably trying to squeeze too many different angles into a single story.

The main point is that the air war was not being reported, and thus the FAA and airlines did not have appropriate warnings.

All of the middle part is just referring to the media and why the story has not been reported, i.e. Obama and the west are backing the Ukrainian government, which would be reported much differently based upon it's action if the Ukrainian government was deemed the enemy. For instance, when Assad in Syria attacks his own people, he is a monster and a war criminal. When it's our puppets in Kiev attacking their own people, dead silence.

oyarde
07-18-2014, 10:12 AM
Probably trying to squeeze too many different angles into a single story.

The main point is that the air war was not being reported, and thus the FAA and airlines did not have appropriate warnings.

All of the middle part is just referring to the media and why the story has not been reported, i.e. Obama and the west are backing the Ukrainian government, which would be reported much differently based upon it's action if the Ukrainian government was deemed the enemy. For instance, when Assad in Syria attacks his own people, he is a monster and a war criminal. When it's our puppets in Kiev attacking their own people, dead silence.

That would be my take on it .

Brian4Liberty
07-19-2014, 12:18 PM
Seems the author is just pointing out that there are two sides of the story, but seems to take as many words as he can to say so.


And that was a major point too. There are two sides, but in the western media, you only hear one, and they have gone out of their way to avoid reporting on the other.