PDA

View Full Version : Cops sue for loss of job after beating suspect. Because...




phill4paul
07-15-2014, 12:45 PM
...the department was being investigated for police brutality and they feel they were fast tracked (nine months) out of the department due to investigation. SMDH. You watch, they'll get a fat check if this plays out as it usually does.


Two Albuquerque police officers accused of holding down and kicking a suspect claim union officials and the department conspired to fast-track their firings as a way to stave off a federal investigation into APD, according to a lawsuit they filed against their union on Monday.

Officers John Doyle and Robert Woolever arrested Nicholas Blume in northeast Albuquerque in February 2011. During the arrest, Woolever held Blume to the ground and Doyle kicked him several times. The incident was captured on surveillance video.

Doyle has said he was trying to kick Blume in the shoulder so that Woolever could place him in handcuffs. The officers have also said it wasn’t clear if Blume was armed because he had reached at his waist during a foot chase, and the officers couldn’t see his hands as they tried to handcuff him.

The two officers were fired about nine months after the incident.

APD’s decision to fire the officers came more quickly than other use-of-force cases that involved the department, said Thomas Grover, an attorney representing Doyle and Woolever.

“It’s the timing of it with the DOJ (Department of Justice) on the horizon,” he said. “It’s (then-APD chief Ray) Schultz saying ‘Look, we’re tough against cops.’”

Doyle and Woolever were taken off active duty in May 2011 when police officials became aware of the kicking. The officers learned they had been fired while watching television news on Nov. 16, 2011, the lawsuit states.

The DOJ started a preliminary investigation in August 2011 and launched a formal one on Nov. 27, 2012. The findings, released last April, found APD had a pattern of violating people’s constitutional rights through its use of force.

Grover said all the officers mentioned in the Justice Department’s subsequent report are still working for APD. Doyle and Woolever, who were not mentioned, are seeking compensation for lost wages, job benefits, promotional, training and employment opportunities and emotional distress.

The lawsuit filed in state District Court names current Albuquerque Police Officers Association president and vice president Stephanie Lopez and Shaun Willoughby, along with former APOA officials Joey Sigala and Ronald Olivas and union attorney Frederick Mowrer. The city and Schultz are not defendants.

The lawsuit alleges union officials withheld protections offered to members and met with police administrators to discuss Doyle and Woolever without the officers’ knowledge.

“You can’t pick and choose who you are going to advocate for,” Grover said of the union.

More...http://www.abqjournal.com/429048/abqnewsseeker/fired-police-officers-file-lawsuit-against-union.html

Philhelm
07-15-2014, 12:48 PM
I don't think that government employees should be allowed to unionize (or vote, for that matter). It's disgusting how people in law enforcement never seem to even have the slightest notion of justice.

jkr
07-15-2014, 12:57 PM
CHA
CHING
!!!

phill4paul
07-15-2014, 12:57 PM
I don't think that government employees should be allowed to unionize (or vote, for that matter). It's disgusting how people in law enforcement never seem to even have the slightest notion of justice.

Even in a " right to work state" some animals are created more equal....


CHAPTER 95. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND LABOR REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 10.
DECLARATION OF POLICY AS TO LABOR ORGANIZATIONS.

N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 95-78. to 84.
§ 95-78. Declaration of public policy.

The right to live includes the right to work. The exercise of the right to work must be protected and maintained free from undue restraints and coercion. It is hereby declared to be the public policy of North Carolina that the right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or labor organization or association. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95-79. Certain agreements declared illegal.

Any agreement or combination between any employer and any labor union or labor organization whereby persons not members of such union or organization shall be denied the right to work for said employer, or whereby such membership is made a condition of employment or continuation of employment by such employer, or whereby any such union or organization acquires an employment monopoly in any enterprise, is hereby declared to be against the public policy and an illegal combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in the State of North Carolina. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95-80. Membership in labor organization as condition of employment prohibited.

No person shall be required by an employer to become or remain a member of any labor union or labor organization as a condition of employment or continuation of employment by such employer. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95-81. Nonmembership as condition of employment prohibited.

No person shall be required by an employer to abstain or refrain from membership in any labor union or labor organization as a condition of employment or continuation of employment. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95.82. Payment of dues as condition of employment prohibited.

No employer shall require any person, as a condition of employment or continuation of employment, to pay any dues, fees, or other charges of any kind to any labor union or labor organization. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95-83. Recovery of damages by persons denied employment.

Any person who may be denied employment or be deprived of continuation of his employment in violation of G.S. 95-80, 95-81 and 95-82 or of one or more of such sections, shall be entitled to recover from such employer and from any other person, firm, corporation, or association acting in concert with him by appropriate action in the courts of this State such damages as he may have sustained by reason of such denial or deprivation of employment. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

§ 95-84. Application of Article.

The provisions of this Article shall not apply to any lawful contract in force on the effective date hereof but they shall apply in all respects to contracts entered into thereafter and to any renewal or extension of any existing contract. (Enacted March 18, 1947.)

ARTICLE 12.
UNITS OF GOVERNMENT AND LABOR UNIONS, TRADE UNIONS, AND LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEE STRIKES

§ 95-98. Contracts between units of government and labor unions,trade unions or labor organizations concerning public employees declared to be illegal.

Any agreement, or contract, between the governing authority of any city, town, county, or other municipality, or between any agency, unit, or instrumentality thereof, or between any agency, instrumentality, or institution of the State of North Carolina, and any labor union, trade union, or labor organization, as bargaining agent for any public employees of such city, town, county or other municipality, or agency or instrumentality of government, is hereby declared to be against the public policy of the State, illegal, unlawful, void and of no effect.(Enacted 1959.)

§ 95-100. No provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 applicable to units of government or their employees.

The provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 of the General Statutes shall not apply to the State of North Carolina or any agency,institution, or instrumentality thereof or the employees of same nor shall the provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 95 of the General Statutes apply to any public employees or any employees of any town, city, county or other municipality or the agencies or instrumentalities thereof, nor shall said Article apply to employees of the State or any agencies, instrumentalities or institutions thereof or to any public employees whatsoever. (Enacted 1959.)

Mani
02-25-2015, 01:44 AM
Officer kicks the crap out of suspect. Then celebrates with Belly Bump.

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/video-new-mexico-police-officers-assault-suspect-celebrate-belly-bump

The belly bump part is obstructed. but the beating is in pretty good view. Man the guy is not resisting at all but getting a pretty good beat down.


No update on if Officer Doyle got his job back, but if ever there was a place to give it back, it would be Albuquerque.

Mach
02-25-2015, 09:48 AM
Just another gang.