PDA

View Full Version : House Tea Party GOPers Oppose Obama Impeachment




Ronin Truth
07-10-2014, 08:11 AM
Newsmax

House Tea Party GOPers Oppose Obama Impeachment


Wednesday, July 9, 2014 05:02 PM


By: Todd Beamon

Several conservative Republicans pushed back Wednesday on calls for President Barack Obama's impeachment.

"Harry Reid's going to block anything we do in that regard," Georgia Rep. Paul Broun told The Hill (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/211734-hard-right-lawmakers-oppose-impeachment#ixzz3701dayPb) on Wednesday.

Broun, a four-term congressman, said in February that he would vote to impeach Obama.

"There are a number of colleagues that would like to see an impeachment proceeding go forward against the president," he said. "I'm not sure our leadership would allow that to happen ... we've got to focus on what we can do."

Louisiana Rep. John Fleming told the Hill: "We'd like to do more, the problem is the avenues are just not available. Even if impeachment was to pass in the House, it wouldn't remove the president from office.

"It's one of those things that if you can't see an end solution, why even get into that debate?" Fleming asked.

The conservatives said that any impeachment effort would die in the Democratic-controlled Senate and would backfire against Republicans in the November congressional elections.

Their comments also appeared to support House Speaker John Boehner and other mainstream Republicans who have resisted calls for impeachment.

"I disagree," Boehner said in response to a reporter's question on whether he supported former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's call on Tuesday for Obama's impeachment, The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/07/09/boehner-disagrees-with-palin-on-impeaching-obama/) reports.

The House will, however, vote this month on whether to bring a lawsuit against Obama over his use of executive actions.

In a commentary for Breitbart, Palin said: "Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president. His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, 'no mas.'"

Two U.S. presidents, (http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Palin-Obama-impeach-immigration/2014/07/09/id/581591/#ixzz3705IP7Lg) Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998, were impeached by the House. Both were acquitted in the Senate, where a two-thirds vote is required to convict and remove a president from office. The Senate vote on Johnson was one vote short of conviction.

In the fall 1998 midterm elections, the GOP lost seats — a rare happening for a party that does not control the White House — amid concerns about Clinton's impeachment and charges of overzealousness by Democrats.

For their part, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee cited Palin's comments in a fundraising email on Tuesday, the Hill reports, calling her comments and the lawsuit "ugly attacks on President Obama's legitimacy."


http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/impeachment-conservative-republicans/2014/07/09/id/581723/

klamath
07-10-2014, 08:22 AM
Wouldn't exactly call a 4 term gop congressmen a teapartyer but I agree with him. Don't waste the time.

Ronin Truth
07-10-2014, 08:48 AM
Waste the time, or they'll probably just use it to do something much stupider and much more expensive.

Peace&Freedom
07-10-2014, 09:08 AM
I say go for it! Any time you can impeach a President who deserves to go, and you can get the votes, it's good for liberty, as it humilates federal power. This may represent a lack of courage on the part of the TP, since they have a recent template to safely work from. The Clinton impeachment was a product of WELL-CONSIDERED timing. Republicans built momentum for it through the investigation of Lewinsky, and related matters through the midterm election months of 1998, then held the impeachment hearings and vote right after the election. Clinton's arrogant stonewalling and posturing at the time helped anger enough pols on both sides of the aisle to get over 2 dozen Democrats to side with Republicans on the impeachment vote.

Holding the vote before the Christmas recess permitted a lot of retiring/defeated lame duck House members to vote their conscience, which overwhelmingly went in the direction of impeachment. Come January, Senate Democrats saved Clinton from removal by voting party line against conviction. So, the GOP could follow a similar game plan with Obarry by staggering out the investigations through the mid-term elections, then holding the hearings and vote during the lame duck session. They wouldn't face a defeat in the effort until mid December, or in January if it got to the Senate, so where is the risk?

specsaregood
07-10-2014, 09:16 AM
Wouldn't exactly call a 4 term gop congressmen a teapartyer but I agree with him. Don't waste the time.

Dr. Broun was a tea partier before the tea party.

His first term he won was during the 2008 primary cycle and he was one of the few politicians that sought and welcomed comparisons to Dr. Ron Paul
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?7761-Paul-Broun-Wins-Congressional-Seat-in-GA-on-a-Ron-Paul-Platform
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?8527-WSJ-s-John-Fund-on-Drs-Broun-and-Paul
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?8686-more-on-Broun-amp-Paul-comparisons

If Dr. Paul can be considered a tea partier, then so can Dr. Broun.

ClydeCoulter
07-10-2014, 09:19 AM
For the average person, multiple arrests and a court date would already be in the papers, if anything even close to what our dear leaders have done were done by them.

If for no other reason than to bring back even a little credibility, it should be done and all of the evidence made public every day during the event.

Ronin Truth
07-10-2014, 09:28 AM
Impeach early and often!