PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court strikes blow to public sector unions




RPfan1992
06-30-2014, 09:07 AM
The Supreme Court dealt a serious blow to public sector unions Monday, limiting their ability to automatically deduct dues from public workers who nevertheless benefit from union negotiated contracts. The ruling fell along ideological lines, with the five conservative Justices in the majority and the four Democratic appointees in dissent.

“This case presents the question whether the First Amendment permits a State to compel personal care providers to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union that they do not wish to join or support,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the majority. “If we accepted Illinois’ argument, we would approve an unprecedented violation of the bedrock principle that, except perhaps in the rarest of circumstances, no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support.”

The ruling is a substantial setback to public sector unions, a bulwark of organized labor’s fading power, a key constituency for the Democratic Party, and a top target for the conservative movement.


Continued: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/supreme-court-public-sector-unions

presence
06-30-2014, 09:14 AM
In my world every federal and state level job would be volunteer. This problem, among many others: Solved.

mczerone
06-30-2014, 09:16 AM
“If we accepted Illinois’ argument, we would approve an unprecedented violation of the bedrock principle that, except perhaps in the rarest of circumstances, no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support.”

So, what, exactly, is the State itself but a third party that speaks and takes actions with money that is compelled from people that definitely don't support 100% of those statements and actions?

angelatc
06-30-2014, 09:22 AM
MSNBC might as well just break down and sob on live TV.

Brett85
06-30-2014, 11:16 AM
So where are all the comments disagreeing with this ruling?

jllundqu
06-30-2014, 11:59 AM
Not many here will disagree with this ruling because it's more cut and dry.