PDA

View Full Version : Aereo is dead: Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of broadcasters




aGameOfThrones
06-25-2014, 11:17 AM
Aereo as we know it has effectively been put out of business. The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with broadcasters who were suing Aereo for taking*over-the-air broadcast signals and delivering*them to your smartphone, tablet or laptop over your Internet connection. As SCOTUSblog informs us, the court’s 6-3 ruling “appears sweeping and definitive, determining that Aereo is illegal.” If Aereo wants to keep delivering broadcast networks’ shows to your Internet-connected devices, it will need to pay licensing fees to broadcasters.


The court’s majority ruling, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, essentially argues that Aereo is a business that’s very similar to cable companies and thus should be required to pay licensing fees to broadcasters for the rights to transmit their shows.

“In other cases involving different kinds of service or technology providers, a user’s involvement in the operation of the provider’s equipment and selection of the content transmitted may well bear on whether the provider performs within the meaning of the Act,” the majority writes. “But the many similarities between Aereo and cable companies… convince us that this difference is not critical here.”

The three justices who dissented from the majority’s opinion were Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Sam Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas.


http://bgr.com/2014/06/25/aereo-v-broadcasters-scotus-ruling/

Matt Collins
06-25-2014, 12:35 PM
How did this make it all the way to the SCOTUS?

This was a clear violation of copyright law (not that I necessarily agree with it).

kahless
06-25-2014, 12:42 PM
Either they will be paying retransmission fees to broadcasters or their done. Whether the networks would agree to such a deal is another question. If they do I think they could still compete with cable albeit the fee will be much higher.

Constitutional Paulicy
06-25-2014, 12:46 PM
How did this make it all the way to the SCOTUS?

This was a clear violation of copyright law (not that I necessarily agree with it).

Lawyers have gotta get paid ya know.

Thor
06-25-2014, 01:07 PM
They had an antenna per user. It would be the same as if someone had a device in their home that picked up OTA broadcast and they sent it to their device thru the internet.


http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site569/2013/0108/20130108__130109aereo2.jpg

Peace&Freedom
06-27-2014, 03:36 AM
...in ruling that Aereo’s providing customers with access to view broadcast TV on the Internet violated copyright law and therefore like cable providers they must pay broadcasters a fee, the high court has created many more problems and distortions now. For instance, this ruling will no doubt cause big problems for Internet cloud services and for everyday ISPs as well. The 6 Supremes voting “nay” on Aereo said that the process looks and seems like the way cable TV provides broadcast TV shows to customers, and therefore it is the same thing. Not so, say dissenters Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. You see, they actually read the copyright law...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/the-supremes-mess-things-up-yet-again/