PDA

View Full Version : IL-Innocent man helps his cellmate, who was also innocent.




Anti Federalist
03-14-2014, 08:17 PM
I'm quite certain that roughly 30 percent of prison inmates are innocent.




This week in innocence

By Radley Balko - March 14 at 4:06 pm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/03/14/this-week-in-innocence/

Christopher Coleman is the second innocence case in the news this week.

Christopher L. Coleman, who was convicted of taking part in an armed home invasion and related crimes in Peoria in 1994, languished behind bars for more than 19 years until he was released on bond in November 2013 after the Illinois Supreme Court reversed his conviction and remanded his case for a retrial based on “compelling evidence of actual innocence.” In March 2014, the Peoria County State’s Attorney’s office dropped the charges.

At his 1995 jury trial before Peoria County Circuit Court Judge Robert Barnes Jr., the prosecution alleged that Coleman had been among five to seven armed and masked men who broke into a home shared by five women, some of whom were robbed and beaten and one of whom was raped. Coleman, 20 at the time of the crime, was not accused of the rape, but rather of being accountable for it.

There was no physical evidence linking Coleman to the crime, but two of the women—the mother and sister of the rape victim—identified him in court. The mother testified that she had known him years earlier and, although she had not seen him recently, recognized him by his voice and distinctive walk, which she described as “kind of crooked like.” The sister testified that she knew Coleman as “Fats” and recognized him when he removed his mask during the crime. Neither of the women had identified Coleman to responding officers, and the sister had incorrectly identified at least two other alleged participants.

Coleman had an alibi that was corroborated by two witnesses. Eventually, four of the five participants in the crime testified that Coleman had no part in it. His request for a new trial was still denied by the trial judge and an appeals court until the Illinois Supreme Court finally overturned his conviction in 2013. Remarkably, Coleman is likely free today because of an odd coincidence — he happened to have shared a cell with another convict who was eventually exonerated. After his release the cellmate, Dana Holland, convinced the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University to look into Coleman’s case.

aGameOfThrones
03-14-2014, 09:16 PM
So when can I expect the judge, prosecutor, mother and sister, cops to pay for sending this innocent man to jail?

heavenlyboy34
03-14-2014, 09:32 PM
So when can I expect the judge, prosecutor, mother and sister, cops to pay for sending this innocent man to jail?
What's that you say, mundane? I can't hear you over all this fucking Freedom (TM).

kcchiefs6465
03-15-2014, 12:20 AM
83%, at the very minimum, have not committed a crime.

It is evil.

And of the 17% accused of an actual crime or convicted of one, I would not doubt thirty percent are innocent.

Look at the molestation cases Janet Reno fabricated in Dade County, or the FBI's persecution of Joseph Salvati.

Or this case.

Or the next.

What does the US Code say on this matter?


18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses...

Whoever—
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;


So how is a prosecutor not charged when he offers leniency in exchange for testimony? After all, the language is quite clear. "Whoever... promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation..." is guilty of bribery.

The SCOTUS, the fine Constitutional gentlemen they are, ruled that "whoever" does not include the government. For if a defense attorney offered someone $10,000 to testify on their behalf, surely everyone would agree of the impropriety. When district attorneys across the country do so daily, "whoever" is simply just another SCOTUS etched out decision.

Many of the innocent (convicted of an actual crime) in prison today, are there because others did not want to go, and they gave names for their freedom. Any person they could think, in some cases, it did not matter.

And if we are supposed to be a nation governed by law, we must all recognize this abortion of justice.

To this day, prosecutors can bribe witnesses or compel testimony without consequence. And as William Blackstone professed, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." Lest you be that innocent suffering.

GunnyFreedom
03-15-2014, 12:38 AM
The SCOTUS, the fine Constitutional gentlemen they are, ruled that "whoever" does not include the government. For if a defense attorney offered someone $10,000 to testify on their behalf, surely everyone would agree of the impropriety. When district attorneys across the country do so daily, "whoever" is simply just another SCOTUS etched out decision. (Emphasis added)

Um, yeah...


http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A4Sec4.html The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Anti Federalist
03-16-2014, 12:43 PM
////

mrsat_98
04-08-2014, 04:53 AM
So when can I expect the judge, prosecutor, mother and sister, cops to pay for sending this innocent man to jail?

Hold that thought.

phill4paul
04-08-2014, 05:36 AM
What's this about innocence, Mundanes? We have crafted so many redundant and petty offenses such that no man is an innocent. Everyone is guilty of something. They just haven't been caught yet. And if we catch you then we can load up on the offenses such that you will never see daylight again. Unless, of course, you wish to plead guilty to just one or two of them. Then we can help you. We really are here to help you help yourself. We are most magnificent in our benevolence. And if a man is to state under oath that he is guilty then who is there to question? So pipe down on this talk of innocence. Somewhere we have a dusty tome to charge you for that offense on our character. Your Lord and Master, Supreme Liaryer, District Attorney Crushnutz.