Weiner brings rainbow crosswalks to San Francisco

[green73]

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/03/13/major-improvements-coming-to-san-franciscos-castro-street/

[HOLLYWOOD]

That's the Castro! I'd like to see some WTF changes too...

Y-M-C-A Boulevard...
Bronski Beat Bistros...
Pet Shop Boys Pet Shops...
and finally, change the name of the Castro to:

Dancing Queen District

[Suzanimal]

We have them in Atlanta now.

http://resize.tegna-media.com/remote/content.11alive.com/photo/2017/07/03/Still0703_00024_1499114740913_9962086_ver1.0.jpg?p reset=wx-large


A follow-up to our report on the Midtown rainbow crosswalks

A couple of days ago, 11Alive did a story on the new rainbow crosswalks at 10th and Piedmont, asking Atlanta taxpayers if they thought the changes were worth the $196,000 price tag.

Since then, we've gotten a lot of feedback on the story. At 11Alive, we hold the powerful accountable. But we also hold ourselves accountable.

On Wednesday, 11Alive asked in a poll on our Facebook page whether taxpayers thought the crosswalks, located in the heart of Midtown, were worth the price. As of 11 p.m. on the same night the story aired, about 4,100 people had cast a vote, with 77 percent of voters responding with a "no" verses 23 percent saying "yes."

As of 9:30 p.m. Friday, almost 14,000 people had cast a vote. The gap closed some, with 67 percent of viewers still voting "no" and 33 percent voting "yes."

Our report about the latest addition to what's considered the heart of the gay community sparked a debate among our viewers, and after the story we received several viewer emails. One of those was from Richard who called our report "intentionally inflammatory and biased." In another, Greg wrote, "You turned something Mayor Reed should be commended for into a tainted, ugly scandal."

So we're setting the record straight. From the beginning, our story was always intended to follow the money -- was the hundreds-of-thousands in taxpayer money spent wisely? So, we're following up our other reports by taking a deeper look at the cost.

The total for the improvements this time around was $196,000.

Some viewers thought the July 1 job was simply paint rolled down on top of the street, as was the case for a temporary installation two years ago for Atlanta Pride Week. In that instance, the crosswalk was paid for by private donations from the community and cost between $5,000 to $7,000, according to a 2015 letter shared from the Department of Public Works. That's well short of the almost 200 grand this time around.

With this latest, permanent installation, taxpayer money was used to lay down thermoplastic panels that are supposed to last 10 years before requiring any heavy maintenance. Those details were reported in all of our stories. Further, as part of the deal, which was wrapped into a previous deal with repaving contractors, the city got one year of free maintenance.

And while the crosswalks did cost $196,000 to install, it included the milling and resurfacing of the intersection (but not sidewalks). Overall, that total cost actually equates to three-tenths of 1 percent of the city's transportation budget.

...

http://www.11alive.com/news/local/holding-powerful-accountable/a-follow-up-to-our-report-on-the-rainbow-crosswalks/456927939

[timosman]

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/03/13/major-improvements-coming-to-san-franciscos-castro-street/


The $4.5 million streetscape project is being funded from the $248 million Road Repaving and Streets Safety Bond, which voters approved in 2011.

That was when Obama was still saying - one man, one woman.

[Carlybee]

We have one in Houston