PDA

View Full Version : US bill 'dramatically strengthens' Israel alliance




nbruno322
03-07-2014, 03:53 PM
US bill 'dramatically strengthens' Israel alliance

Bill to expand delivery of forward-deployed US weapons to Israel and help commit Congress to further funding of the Iron Dome.

The US House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday that declares Israel a "major strategic partner" of the United States, reinforcing the broad relationship between the two nations and laying the groundwork for more expansive strategic cooperation.

The bill would expand the delivery of forward-deployed US weapons to Israel, as well as other military technologies, and would commit Congress to further funding of the Iron Dome short-range missile defense system.

Controversially, the bill would also invite Israel into a visa waiver agreement with the US, which has been opposed by members of the intelligence community and the Democratic caucus for multiple years.

The bill passed 410-1 in the House. The Senate has taken up a similar measure, which is still in the committee process.

Just a day after its annual policy conference in Washington, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee declared the bill's passage a victory, and characterized the measure as "dramatically strengthening the US-Israel relationship."

"This designation lays the foundation for expanded US-Israel cooperation in a wide variety of spheres, including defense, intelligence, homeland security, energy, agriculture and trade," AIPAC said in a statement, applauding the bill as "critical" and calling on the Senate to act with similar haste.

The second half of the bill, which focuses on US-Israel energy relationships, was authored by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Ranking Member Henry A. Waxman (D-CA) and aims to strengthen collaboration between the two countries on energy projects.

The United States-Israel Energy Cooperation Enhancement Bill first passed through the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee on December 11, and a Senate companion bill passed through the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on December 20. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), chairwoman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, was responsible for the Senate companion bill, alongside Se.s Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).

This portion of the bill officially determines that "United States-Israel energy cooperation, and the development of natural resources by Israel, are strategic interests of the United States," recognizing Israel specifically as a partner in water technology, safety and security arenas. Encouraging the US National Science Foundation to collaborate with the Israel Science Foundation, the text also encourages more robust academic cooperation in a variety of energy-related fields.

Advocating "open dialogue and continued mechanisms for regular engagement," the bill calls for continued energy partnerships among government and academic institutions as well as the private sector from both sides. Some particular topics of interest include identifying priorities for developing Israeli natural resources, discussing best practices to secure cyber energy infrastructure, leveraging natural gas to positively impact regional stability and improving energy efficiency, the bill says.

The bill also acknowledges the important role of the US-Israel Binational research and Development Foundation (BIRD) and the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation, and commits continued multiyear funding "to ensure the continuity of the programs of the foundations."

“I am pleased this important measure was included in the legislative package and encouraged to see it received such overwhelming support," Upton said, following the bill's passage. "With a simple amendment to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, this legislation will help bolster the partnership between Israel and the US on energy production and help enhance energy security."

With American assistance, Israel will be able to continue making advancements in developing its natural resources, Upton stressed. He also committed to working on future "commonsense energy solutions" with colleagues from both sides of the aisle, as occurred while drafting this legislation.

"Today the House passed an important bill that will expand the partnership between the U.S. and Israel," Waxman agreed. "Israel is a close ally, and it is in our national interest to help the Israelis development their natural resources in a responsible way that protects the environment."

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/US-bill-dramatically-strengthens-Israel-alliance-344651

Philhelm
03-07-2014, 03:56 PM
Israel is such a liability that it blows my mind. South Korea too. It's pre-World War I levels of foolishness.

Mini-Me
03-07-2014, 06:33 PM
Israel is such a liability that it blows my mind. South Korea too. It's pre-World War I levels of foolishness.

I've never heard anyone put it that way, but that really puts it into perspective. World War I was a textbook example of why entangling alliances are such a bad thing, so what do we do? Make sure we have more alliances and more inescapable alliances than any other country since the mammoths walked the Earth.

dillo
03-07-2014, 06:37 PM
Israel is such a liability that it blows my mind. South Korea too. It's pre-World War I levels of foolishness.

Its profitable for someone

pcosmar
03-07-2014, 06:43 PM
Who voted against it?

DamianTV
03-07-2014, 07:56 PM
We're trying our damnedest to make the Ukraine our "Bitch", and at the same time become the "Bitch" of Israel.

kcchiefs6465
03-07-2014, 07:58 PM
Who voted against it?
Thomas Massie.

Send out some thanks in his subforum, there is a thread there about him being the only 'No' vote. I'm sure it isn't easy standing against 355 cosponsors.

Austrian Econ Disciple
03-07-2014, 08:18 PM
Thomas Massie.

Send out some thanks in his subforum, there is a thread there about him being the only 'No' vote. I'm sure it isn't easy standing against 355 cosponsors.

Amash voted for it?

kcchiefs6465
03-07-2014, 08:21 PM
Amash voted for it?
Yes, he did.

Walter Jones did not vote.

Kerry Bentivolio was one of the cosponsors (along with Paul Ryan, et. al).

kcchiefs6465
03-07-2014, 08:25 PM
A summary of HR 938:


Amends the Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 to extend authority to: (1) make additions to foreign-based defense stockpiles, and (2) transfer certain obsolete or surplus Department of Defense (DOD) items to Israel.

Authorizes the President to carry out U.S.-Israel cooperative activities and to provide assistance for cooperation in the fields of energy, water, homeland security, agriculture, and alternative fuel technologies.

Amends the the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to extend the grant program for U.S.-Israeli cooperation on research, development, and commercialization of renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Expresses the sense of Congress that the United States and Israel should increase cyber-security cooperation.

Urges the President to provide assistance for enhancement of the David's Sling Weapon System, the joint United States-Israel Arrow Weapon System, and the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

States that it shall be U.S. policy to include Israel in the visa waiver program when Israel satisfies such program's inclusion requirements.

Mini-Me
03-07-2014, 08:43 PM
Thomas Massie.

Send out some thanks in his subforum, there is a thread there about him being the only 'No' vote. I'm sure it isn't easy standing against 355 cosponsors.

I can attest to Massie appreciating support: He apparently reads his forum, because he went out of his way to thank me when I mentioned in another thread that he had earned my trust.

kcchiefs6465
03-07-2014, 08:54 PM
I can attest to Massie appreciating support: He apparently reads his forum, because he went out of his way to thank me when I mentioned in another thread that he had earned my trust.
And as well, after taking such a principled stand, that thread should be flooded with thanks. (and a donation if one can spare)

HOLLYWOOD
03-07-2014, 09:50 PM
Here's a lite snack...
Congressman Jim Traficant was correct and first alerted America to bags of money and technology taken by Israel that continues to suck through; subsidies, welfare, joint development programs, money grants, educational transfers, business development, tax credits, supplemental funding bills, technology transfers, lopsided trade agreements, Israeli espionage, tax credit donations, and very sensitive DOD IP out of the US at an estimated total cost to taxpayers of $10-12 Billion a year. Of course Israel is also sucking money and aid of taxpayers from other countries like; Canada, UK, and Germany. Germany just announced a 6th Dolphin class submarine they are building and partially subsidizing for Israel after giving them numerous other Dolphin subs. Additionally, there has been no accountability on US export controls of restricted technology, which the the New York Times originally reported from an classified Inspector General report, in which, such U.S. technologies were eventually sold to China and South Africa. (see attached/link below)

You will see from different US government departments giving trade protections as well as fining US firms for not complying with the very biased codes... see US Treasury, IRS, OAC.

This has been going on for decades under:
US-Israel Binational research and Development Foundation (BIRD) and the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation, and commits continued multiyear funding "to ensure the continuity of the programs of the foundations."
which has cost billions more which is not on the official US tax money giveaways to Israel under US State Department USAID etc programs. One example project the US has sunk well over a $1 Billion into the ARROW missile development under "joint development". Arrow Anti-Missile development program (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Fsgp%2Fcrs%2Fmideast %2FRL33222.pdf&ei=ipIaU4X0F8fFoAT5n4HQAQ&usg=AFQjCNHdAKMR9JX8FS42qYYbikkGbLosSw)

Check this out: http://www.irmep.org/ila/Audit/default.asp
http://kwout.com/cutout/h/3q/k4/x5a_bor.jpg
Arms-Export Reports Further Strain U.S.-Israeli Ties - New York Time (http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/15/world/arms-export-reports-further-strain-us-israeli-ties.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm)

There's a number of other welfare deals, like the Tariff con game, where Israel charges substantially high tariffs(under the cloak of price fixing) on their US imports and gets a sweetheart deals of low tariffs on their exports to the U.S.. Not only do they receive those deals, the U.S. taxpayers subsidize products shipped from Israel, as trivial as tomatoes under the: Agreement on Trade in Agricultural Products (ATAP) . US taxpayers are told of FTA, but even subsidizing trivial products like tomatoes.

I did find this site that gives a historical synopsis of gross negligence by .gov: http://humansarefree.com/2013/10/10-explosive-us-government-secrets.html

BTW, if you want to use the FOIA to see exactly latest detailed trade agreement analysis... this is what was initially received.

http://www.irmep.org/ila/Audit/default.asp
http://www.irmep.org/ila/Audit/roa.gif (http://www.irmep.org/ila/Audit/1992report_of_audit.pdf)

Detailed Information on Redacted Documents: http://www.irmep.org/ila/Audit/default.asp

And then this protectionism at the expense of taxpayers:

http://kwout.com/cutout/y/9n/77/gyj_bor.jpg


OAC keeps a low profile and never fines anyone enough to make it financially worthwhile for an exporter to pop into court and challenge its statutory authority. And, it seems that OAC fines exporters for one simple, but obscure, violation over and over and over. We have reported on this many times, including here (http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1813) and here (http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/415).
efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/component/docman/doc_download/897-a737?Itemid=


In 1977, Congress amended the Export Administration Act (EAA) to prohibit certain
forms of compliance with international boycotts. 50 U.S.C.A. §§ 2401-2420 (West 1983). The
1976 version of the EAA had been defeated when Congress adjourned without final approval,
due to a Senate filibuster. Antiboycott legislation became an issue during the 1976 presidential
campaign, with Jimmy Carter taking a strong position in favor of the law. In early 1977, the
issue again came before Congress, and again was highly controversial. In private negotiations,
the representatives of the Business Roundtable and major Jewish service organizations
reached agreement on a "Statement of Principles", which became the basis for the EAA provisions
signed into law in June 1977.
http://kwout.com/cutout/c/gv/ie/hrw_bor.jpg
US Updates the List of Anti-Boycott Countries (http://aviationsuppliers.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/us-updates-the-list-of-anti-boycott-countries-are-you-doing-business-there/)