Ben Swann Video: John Paul Stevens Wants To ReWrite The Second Amendment

[ZakCarter]

Do you agree with John Paul Stevens or Ben Swann on this one?

http://benswann.com/john-paul-stevens-wants-to-rewrite-the-second-amendment/


"Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wants to add wording to the second amendment. Wording that would drastically change its meaning. The big question… is Stevens right when he claims that the founders and framers did not believe in the right to personal protection. Ben explores that question in this video."


And you won't want to miss Ben's upcoming fundraiser - I got a few people with names you'll recognize to send us a few autographed books that we'll be giving away!

https://www.facebook.com/events/1449305171967881/

[Todd]

If he believes that's what the 2A really means that the founders meant a "militia", then why does he need rewrite it?

Ah!........because it doesn't really mean that.

[gwax23]

Rewrite it to this:

"No law shall abridge the right of self-defense by victims or their agents against initiators of aggression (including governments or their agents), including the right, to own, manufacture, sell, and bear arms; but the right of self-defense shall not be construed to license resistance on the part of such aggressors to the legitimate use of force against them in defense of the rights of their victims."