PDA

View Full Version : Palin defends McCain after he’s censured by the Arizona GOP




Right Wing
01-30-2014, 08:46 PM
Palin defends McCain after he’s censured by the Arizona GOP

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/28/palin-defends-mccain-after-hes-censured-by-the-arizona-gop/

This is the one thing about Palin that irks me. She continously finds it necessary to defend McCain whose team not only knifed Palin in the back, but McCain represents much of what is wrong with the party, the country, and the human race.

rpfocus
02-05-2014, 12:47 PM
Palin defends McCain after he’s censured by the Arizona GOP

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/28/palin-defends-mccain-after-hes-censured-by-the-arizona-gop/

This is the one thing about Palin that irks me. She continously finds it necessary to defend McCain whose team not only knifed Palin in the back, but McCain represents much of what is wrong with the party, the country, and the human race.

Yep, he did knife her in the back, but honestly, she should never have been picked for VP. Palin definitely wasn't ready for prime time.

Christian Liberty
02-05-2014, 12:49 PM
If I had to pick between President Palin and President McCain, it would be a no-brainer in favor of Palin. She's not too bright, but at least her intentions seem like they might be good. McCain is a wicked warmonger.

Heck, I'd take Obama again over President McCain.

rpfocus
02-05-2014, 01:01 PM
If I had to pick between President Palin and President McCain, it would be a no-brainer in favor of Palin. She's not too bright, but at least her intentions seem like they might be good. McCain is a wicked warmonger.

Heck, I'd take Obama again over President McCain.

Hmm, I agree. I despise chickenhawks. I'd never want to actually give her the 'keys' to the military, but it would have been interesting to see how she would handle military conflicts. Plus she actually had/has a son serving.

jkr
02-05-2014, 01:19 PM
dear Sarah,

"Only fight when you can win"

your hommie,

-sun tzu

compromise
02-05-2014, 01:52 PM
Hmm, I agree. I despise chickenhawks. I'd never want to actually give her the 'keys' to the military, but it would have been interesting to see how she would handle military conflicts. Plus she actually had/has a son serving.

Here's her Syria op-ed:


"So we’re bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I’m the idiot?” - Sarah Palin

* President Obama wants America involved in Syria’s civil war pitting the antagonistic Assad regime against equally antagonistic Al Qaeda affiliated rebels. But he’s not quite sure which side is doing what, what the ultimate end game is, or even whose side we should be on. Haven’t we learned? WAGs don’t work in war.

* We didn’t intervene when over 100,000 Syrians were tragically slaughtered by various means, but we’ll now intervene to avenge the tragic deaths of over 1,000 Syrians killed by chemical weapons, though according to the White House we’re not actually planning to take out the chemical weapons because doing so would require “too much of a commitment.”

* President Obama wants to do what, exactly? Punish evil acts in the form of a telegraphed air strike on Syria to serve as a deterrent? If our invasion of Iraq wasn’t enough of a deterrent to stop evil men from using chemical weapons on their own people, why do we think this will be?

* The world sympathizes with the plight of civilians tragically caught in the crossfire of this internal conflict. But President Obama’s advertised war plan (which has given Assad enough of a heads-up that he’s reportedly already placing human shields at targeted sites) isn’t about protecting civilians, and it’s not been explained how lobbing U.S. missiles at Syria will help Syrian civilians. Do we really think our actions help either side or stop them from hurting more civilians?

* We have no clear mission in Syria. There’s no explanation of what vital American interests are at stake there today amidst yet another centuries-old internal struggle between violent radical Islamists and a murderous dictatorial regime, and we have no business getting involved anywhere without one. And where’s the legal consent of the people’s representatives? Our allies in Britain have already spoken. They just said no. The American people overwhelmingly agree, and the wisdom of the people must be heeded.

* Our Nobel Peace Prize winning President needs to seek Congressional approval before taking us to war. It’s nonsense to argue that, “Well, Bush did it.” Bull. President Bush received support from both Congress and a coalition of our allies for “his wars,” ironically the same wars Obama says he vehemently opposed because of lack of proof of America’s vital interests being at stake.

* Bottom line is that this is about President Obama saving political face because of his “red line” promise regarding chemical weapons.

* As I said before, if we are dangerously uncertain of the outcome and are led into war by a Commander-in-chief who can’t recognize that this conflict is pitting Islamic extremists against an authoritarian regime with both sides shouting “Allah Akbar” at each other, then let Allah sort it out.

- Sarah Palin

cajuncocoa
02-05-2014, 01:59 PM
If I had to pick between President Palin and President McCain, it would be a no-brainer in favor of Palin. She's not too bright, but at least her intentions seem like they might be good. McCain is a wicked warmonger.

Heck, I'd take Obama again over President McCain.
The good news is, you don't have to choose. Even if that is the choice we are given, you can refuse to play.

cajuncocoa
02-05-2014, 02:00 PM
Here's her Syria op-ed:
I can't be the only one who realizes that she would be all for bombing Syria if a Republican sat in the Oval Office.

eduardo89
02-05-2014, 03:15 PM
I can't be the only one who realizes that she would be all for bombing Syria if a Republican sat in the Oval Office.

She wouldn't. But if she did, I'd support her. Palin is always right.

twomp
02-05-2014, 03:36 PM
She wouldn't. But if she did, I'd support her. Palin is always right.

lol I see you have promoted yourself from GOP cheerleader to forum troll. Congrats!

rpfocus
02-05-2014, 06:14 PM
Here's her Syria op-ed:

I agree with most of Pain's op-ed. I don't see Obama going to war with Syria though. There's a big difference between a strike and sending the troops. He'd rather drone them anyway.