PDA

View Full Version : Beretta USA "frustrated" at MD over gun control, opening new facility in TN.




Anti Federalist
01-29-2014, 07:47 PM
Gun company, Beretta, bringing 300 jobs to Gallatin

Company's investment will top $44 million

Jan. 29, 2014 6:56 PM

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20140129/BUSINESS/301290171/Gun-company-Beretta-bringing-300-jobs-Gallatin?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1

Italian gunmaker Beretta USA plans to make Gallatin its manufacturing base in the United States, announcing plans Wednesday to invest $45 million in a firearms plant that will initially employ 300 workers.

Tennessee’s reputation as a gun-friendly state was key to the Sumner County city landing its biggest economic development win since clothing retailer Gap Inc. opened a distribution center two decades ago.

“This is a platinum project,” Gallatin Mayor Jo Graves Ann said. “It’s an international company. It’s well-known, it has an excellent reputation and we’re very excited that they’ve chosen (us) over eight other states.”

As a result of choosing Gallatin, Beretta will be eligible for tax credits, infrastructure and job training grants from the state. Details also are being finalized for a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes grant from Gallatin.

Beretta, meanwhile, is negotiating with Gallatin officials to buy 100 acres at the Gallatin Industrial Center off Airport Road where the manufacturing and research and development facility will be built. Construction should start by May with production expected to start during the first quarter of 2015.

The site Beretta is pursuing is part of the 200-acre expansion phase of the Gallatin industrial park. Western Reflections and Laminate Technologies are among tenants in the first phase that’s 90 percent full.

Beretta USA’s choice of Gallatin came after nearly a year-long search for a location to expand U.S. manufacturing outside of Maryland where the world’s oldest manufacturing dynasty, operating since 1526 in Italy, employs about 350 at a factory in Accokeek.

After Maryland passed stricter gun legislation in the aftermath of the December 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., Beretta expressed frustration about the new laws and said it might be looking for a new home for that factory.

Initially, Beretta focused on states that expressed strong support for second Amendment rights, said Jeff Reh, a board member of Beretta USA. It narrowed down that list by looking at factors for investment, including tax rates, cost of living, quality of local educational institutions, availability of workers, and job recruitment support from the state, including training programs.

Beretta then visited 80 specific locations over five months before narrowing the number of sites to six. After more visits, three sites remained in the running and Gallatin was chosen as the best possible location for the expansion.

“We’re convinced we could find no better place than Tennessee to establish our new manufacturing enterprise,” said Franco Gussalli Beretta, executive vice president and a director of Beretta USA. “We look forward to building operations here and being part of your community for many years to come.”

Beretta isn’t the only well-known gunmaker to consider sites around Middle Tennessee over the past year. Remington Arms also considered a corporate relocation or expansion of manufacturing here last year, but has since decided to pursue opportunities elsewhere, local economic development officials said. Already, firearms maker Barrett Firearms Manufacturing has its headquarters and a manufacturing plant in Murfreesboro.

Beretta expects to have up to 300 employees working at the plant by the third or fourth year of operations and is exploring projects that could add more jobs in Gallatin, Reh said. The company will keep the manufacturing plant in Maryland open, but some employees might choose to move here, he added. The company also has not indicated where the company’s U.S. headquarters will be located long-term.

The Gallatin plant will make firearms for Beretta’s sporting and tactical product lines. The company is privately owned and operated by members of the 15th and 16th generations of the Beretta family.

Gallatin has added 350 jobs in the past year through expansion of existing employers, such as Gap and ABC Group Fuel. Gallatin had a 6.7 percent unemployment rate for November. “It’s a spectacular opportunity for Gallatin, and it allows for the visibility that Gallatin deserves,” said James Fenton, executive director of the Gallatin Economic Development Agency, said about the Beretta expansion.

Anti Federalist
01-29-2014, 07:47 PM
Wish we could have gotten them in NH.

DamianTV
01-29-2014, 08:11 PM
Method #3 for getting rid of guns after Confiscation and Prohibition: Regulate the gun makers out of business.

Neil Desmond
01-29-2014, 11:29 PM
Here's another article on Yahoo!: http://news.yahoo.com/beretta-build-firearms-plant-tenn-200033943.html

Neil Desmond
01-29-2014, 11:31 PM
Method #3 for getting rid of guns after Confiscation and Prohibition: Regulate the gun makers out of business.
Two things:

1. Where would law enforcement get their guns from?

2. Suppose gun makers do get regulated out of business. What advantage is there in doing that for the gun grabbers, given that now we can 3D print guns?

Tod
01-29-2014, 11:49 PM
It would be nice to see a manufacturer recognize the police state and refuse to sell to government agencies (including police departments). Probably not enough remaining revenue to stay in business, I suppose.

Neil Desmond
01-29-2014, 11:57 PM
It would be nice to see a manufacturer recognize the police state and refuse to sell to government agencies (including police departments). Probably not enough remaining revenue to stay in business, I suppose.
Wouldn't it be essential for them to refuse to sell to any states or government agencies that have any kind of gun restrictions or bans, to keep them from having the resources they would need to enforce such odious and treasonous laws? Seems to me they'd be stupid to sell to the government, in that case.

Matt Collins
01-30-2014, 12:41 AM
This is a facade the TN Governor is hiding behind because he is anti-firearms.

Anti Federalist
01-30-2014, 07:12 AM
Two things:

1. Where would law enforcement get their guns from?

2. Suppose gun makers do get regulated out of business. What advantage is there in doing that for the gun grabbers, given that now we can 3D print guns?

1 - One or two crony corps. would be "allowed" to stay in business, in order to arm the Empire adequately. At greatly inflated prices of course.

2 - 3D printing of guns will be prohibited. Compliance will be achieved by requiring every 3D printer to be tied into the grid before it will print, so that every print job can be monitored in real time for compliance.

Lucille
07-24-2014, 04:00 PM
Claire Wolfe (http://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/ClaireWolfe/2014/07/24/thursday-links-26/): You may have heard that Maryland-based Beretta, which had planned to expand into Tennessee, decided instead to move all its manufacturing there after Maryland passed bad gun laws. Better than that, even. In looking for a new location, Beretta explicitly rejected West Virginia because of Joe Manchin.

Click through for the story and letter she linked to.

LibForestPaul
07-24-2014, 05:10 PM
1 - One or two crony corps. would be "allowed" to stay in business, in order to arm the Empire adequately. At greatly inflated prices of course.

2 - 3D printing of guns will be prohibited. Compliance will be achieved by requiring every 3D printer to be tied into the grid before it will print, so that every print job can be monitored in real time for compliance.

I could see #2 wanting to be implemented. Can not envision it. Best bet is hidden watermarking.

TheCount
07-24-2014, 05:17 PM
Wish we could have gotten them in NH.

The reason NH didn't get them is because they aren't bribing the company with taxpayer-funded "incentives."

TheCount
07-24-2014, 05:24 PM
Tennessee's incentive package for Beretta totals $10.41 million. Of that, $8 million is through the FastTrack Economic Development Program to assist in construction and building improvements. Another $2.41 million in grants is devoted to job training. The State Funding Board approved the incentive package on Feb. 5.



$10.41 million to move 300 jobs. You do the math.



The company is also getting "a considerable amount of assistance" from Gallatin to acquire the land, Fenton said, though he declined to elaborate.

Mmm, eminent domain. Smells like free markets! FREEDOM!


http://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/blog/2014/02/behind-the-beretta-deal-workforce.html?page=all

Anti Federalist
07-24-2014, 09:41 PM
The reason NH didn't get them is because they aren't bribing the company with taxpayer-funded "incentives."

Nor is it legal to use eminent domain to enrich a private enterprise.

I wish we could have gotten them just simply based on being a great place to live and do business.

SIG loves NH.

FindLiberty
07-25-2014, 03:56 AM
It's sort of an "unloaded" gun tragedy for Accokeek (economic ripples after plant closes)...

http://www.somdnews.com/article/20140725/NEWS/140729647/1057/section/news07/&template=southernMaryland

Usually, new jobs are a good thing! So, will the TN Governor just tap dance for as long as possible, or change that
anti-firearms stance (and find/embrace new re-election support/funding), after checking on the latest wind direction?

TheCount
07-25-2014, 05:50 AM
So, will the TN Governor just tap dance for as long as possible, or change that anti-firearms stance (and find/embrace new re-election support/funding), after checking on the latest wind direction? Why would he need to change his anti-gun stance? He just bought $10 million worth of pro-gun PR and votes using taxpayer money. His policies will get him anti-gun support and campaign contributions, and he'll schedule many gun-related campaign events to shore up those votes and contributions. And, per their arrangement, there will be a Beretta executive on stage with him every single time.

Demigod
07-25-2014, 06:46 AM
Two things:

1. Where would law enforcement get their guns from?

2. Suppose gun makers do get regulated out of business. What advantage is there in doing that for the gun grabbers, given that now we can 3D print guns?

National Defense Industry