Keith and stuff
01-24-2014, 06:13 PM
It's great that states, or even just certain lawmakers in states, are taking on the NSA. It's really up to the mayor of DC and the governors of MD, VA and UT, though. Isn't that where the major NSA installations are? Did I leave some off?
Arizona, New Hampshire, Tennessee lawmakers target NSA
By Josh Peterson / January 24, 2014
http://watchdog.org/125238/nsa-3/
Lawmakers across the nation are continuing their campaign against the National Security Agency and the federal government’s expansive surveillance powers.
ALL YOUR PHONE CALLS ARE BELONG TO US: The NSA collects “meta-data” including call duration and location, for all Americans at all times. That violates at least three amendments to the Constitution, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in California.
State lawmakers in New Hampshire and Arizona introduced legislation this week pushing back against the federal government’s warrantless data collection programs.
The bills are modeled on legislation drafted by the OffNow.org coalition, a state level organization challenging the federal government’s warrantless electronic surveillance activities.
In New Hampshire, HB1533, sponsored by two Republican state representatives, Neal Kurk and Emily Sandblade, and Democrat state Rep. Tim O’Flaherty, would prohibit a state official from searching a portable electronic device without a warrant.
Any official caught in willful violation could be charged with a Class-A misdemeanor, which under New Hampshire state law means immediate jail time upon conviction, along with a possible fine and probation.
HB1619, also sponsored by Kurk, “affirms a reasonable expectation of privacy in information from sources including, telephone; electric, water and other utility services; internet service providers; social media providers; banks and financial institutions; insurance companies; and credit card companies,” OffNow.org said in a statement.
The bill makes an exception for federal agents to collect data without a warrant, but bars state agencies from receiving and using the information in court.
In Arizona, SB1156, which has 14 Republican sponsors, was introduced by state Sen. Kelli Ward. It would bar the state from providing material support to the agency’s activities and ban any data collected without a warrant from being used in court.
Ward announced her intentions in December to introduce a bill that would keep Arizona from supporting the NSA.
Tennessee state lawmakers Sen. Stacey Campfield, R-Knoxville, and State Rep. Andy Holt, R-Dresden, introduced companion bills earlier in the week that would ban state officials from providing material support to an NSA code-breaking facility at Oak Ridge.
The bill mirrors similar legislation introduced Jan. 15 by two Washington state lawmakers seeking to deny material support and state funds to a NSA listening post at the U.S. Army’s Yakima Training Facility.
OffNow.org’s legal reasoning behind supporting the states refusing to help NSA is based in the Supreme Court legal precedent of the anti-commandeering doctrine, which recognizes that states can refuse to comply with federal laws and programs.
The principle is disputable under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, however, which defers authority to the federal government in the event a conflict over power takes place between the federal and local governments.
OffNow.org has been able to find legislative allies not only in New Hampshire, Arizona, and Tennessee, but also Oklahoma, and Indiana.
“Sources close to the Coalition indicate lawmakers in several other states will introduce the act in the coming weeks,” said OffNow.org in a news statement on Thursday.
Continue reading. http://watchdog.org/125238/nsa-3/
Arizona, New Hampshire, Tennessee lawmakers target NSA
By Josh Peterson / January 24, 2014
http://watchdog.org/125238/nsa-3/
Lawmakers across the nation are continuing their campaign against the National Security Agency and the federal government’s expansive surveillance powers.
ALL YOUR PHONE CALLS ARE BELONG TO US: The NSA collects “meta-data” including call duration and location, for all Americans at all times. That violates at least three amendments to the Constitution, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in California.
State lawmakers in New Hampshire and Arizona introduced legislation this week pushing back against the federal government’s warrantless data collection programs.
The bills are modeled on legislation drafted by the OffNow.org coalition, a state level organization challenging the federal government’s warrantless electronic surveillance activities.
In New Hampshire, HB1533, sponsored by two Republican state representatives, Neal Kurk and Emily Sandblade, and Democrat state Rep. Tim O’Flaherty, would prohibit a state official from searching a portable electronic device without a warrant.
Any official caught in willful violation could be charged with a Class-A misdemeanor, which under New Hampshire state law means immediate jail time upon conviction, along with a possible fine and probation.
HB1619, also sponsored by Kurk, “affirms a reasonable expectation of privacy in information from sources including, telephone; electric, water and other utility services; internet service providers; social media providers; banks and financial institutions; insurance companies; and credit card companies,” OffNow.org said in a statement.
The bill makes an exception for federal agents to collect data without a warrant, but bars state agencies from receiving and using the information in court.
In Arizona, SB1156, which has 14 Republican sponsors, was introduced by state Sen. Kelli Ward. It would bar the state from providing material support to the agency’s activities and ban any data collected without a warrant from being used in court.
Ward announced her intentions in December to introduce a bill that would keep Arizona from supporting the NSA.
Tennessee state lawmakers Sen. Stacey Campfield, R-Knoxville, and State Rep. Andy Holt, R-Dresden, introduced companion bills earlier in the week that would ban state officials from providing material support to an NSA code-breaking facility at Oak Ridge.
The bill mirrors similar legislation introduced Jan. 15 by two Washington state lawmakers seeking to deny material support and state funds to a NSA listening post at the U.S. Army’s Yakima Training Facility.
OffNow.org’s legal reasoning behind supporting the states refusing to help NSA is based in the Supreme Court legal precedent of the anti-commandeering doctrine, which recognizes that states can refuse to comply with federal laws and programs.
The principle is disputable under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, however, which defers authority to the federal government in the event a conflict over power takes place between the federal and local governments.
OffNow.org has been able to find legislative allies not only in New Hampshire, Arizona, and Tennessee, but also Oklahoma, and Indiana.
“Sources close to the Coalition indicate lawmakers in several other states will introduce the act in the coming weeks,” said OffNow.org in a news statement on Thursday.
Continue reading. http://watchdog.org/125238/nsa-3/