PDA

View Full Version : Rolling Stone - Five Economic Reforms (communism) Millennials Should be Fighting for




VoluntaryAmerican
01-07-2014, 03:57 PM
By Jesse A. Myerson
January 3, 2014 10:00 AM ET

It's a new year, but one thing hasn't changed: The economy still blows. Five years after Wall Street crashed, America's banker-gamblers have only gotten richer, while huge swaths of the country are still drowning in personal debt, tens of millions of Americans remain unemployed – and the new jobs being created are largely low-wage, sub-contracted, part-time grunt work.

Millennials have been especially hard-hit by the downturn, which is probably why so many people in this generation (like myself) regard capitalism with a level of suspicion that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. But that egalitarian impulse isn't often accompanied by concrete proposals about how to get out of this catastrophe. Here are a few things we might want to start fighting for, pronto, if we want to grow old in a just, fair society, rather than the economic hellhole our parents have handed us.

1. Guaranteed Work for Everybody

Unemployment blows. The easiest and most direct solution is for the government to guarantee that everyone who wants to contribute productively to society is able to earn a decent living in the public sector. There are millions of people who want to work, and there's tons of work that needs doing – it's a no-brainer. And this idea isn't as radical as it might sound: It's similar to what the federal Works Progress Administration made possible during Roosevelt's New Deal, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. vocally supported a public-sector job guarantee in the 1960s.

A job guarantee that paid a living wage would anchor prices, drive up conditions for workers at megacorporations like Walmart and McDonald's, and target employment for the poor and long-term unemployed – people to whom conventional stimulus money rarely trickles all the way down. The program would automatically expand during private-sector downturns and contract during private-sector upswings, balancing out the business cycle and sending people from job to job, rather than job to unemployment, when times got tough.

Some economists have proposed running a job guarantee through the non-profit sector, which would make it even easier to suit the job to the worker. Imagine a world where people could contribute the skills that inspire them – teaching, tutoring, urban farming, cleaning up the environment, painting murals – rather than telemarketing or whatever other stupid tasks bosses need done to supplement their millions. Sounds nice, doesn't it?

2. Social Security for All

But let's think even bigger. Because as much as unemployment blows, so do jobs. What if people didn't have to work to survive? Enter the jaw-droppingly simple idea of a universal basic income, in which the government would just add a sum sufficient for subsistence to everyone's bank account every month. A proposal along these lines has been gaining traction in Switzerland, and it's starting to get a lot of attention here, too.

We live in the age of 3D printers and self-replicating robots. Actual human workers are increasingly surplus to requirement – that's one major reason why we have such a big unemployment problem. A universal basic income would address this epidemic at the root and provide everyone, in the words of Duke professor Kathi Weeks, "time to cultivate new needs for pleasures, activities, senses, passions, affects, and socialities that exceed the options of working and saving, producing and accumulating."

Put another way: A universal basic income, combined with a job guarantee and other social programs, could make participation in the labor force truly voluntary, thereby enabling people to get a life.

3. Take Back The Land

Ever noticed how much landlords blow? They don't really do anything to earn their money. They just claim ownership of buildings and charge people who actually work for a living the majority of our incomes for the privilege of staying in boxes that these owners often didn't build and rarely if ever improve. In a few years, my landlord will probably sell my building to another landlord and make off with the appreciated value of the land s/he also claims to own – which won't even get taxed, as long as s/he ploughs it right back into more real estate.

Think about how stupid that is. The value of the land has nothing to do with my idle, remote landlord; it reflects the nearby parks and subways and shops, which I have access to thanks to the community and the public. So why don't the community and the public derive the value and put it toward uses that benefit everyone? Because capitalism, is why.

The most mainstream way of flipping the script is a simple land-value tax. By targeting wealthy real estate owners and their free rides, we can fight inequality and poverty directly, make disastrous asset price bubbles impossible and curb Wall Street's hideous bloat. There are cooler ideas out there, too: Municipalities themselves can be big-time landowners, and groups can even create large-scale community land trusts so that the land is held in common. In any case, we have to stop letting rich people pretend they privately own what nature provided everyone.

4. Make Everything Owned by Everybody

Hoarders blow. Take, for instance, the infamous one percent, whose ownership of the capital stock of this country leads to such horrific inequality. "Capital stock" refers to two things here: the buildings and equipment that workers use to produce goods and services, and the stocks and bonds that represent ownership over the former. The top 10 percent's ownership of the means of production is represented by the fact that they control 80 percent of all financial assets.

This detachment means that there's a way easier way to collectivize wealth ownership than having to stage uprisings that seize the actual airplanes and warehouses and whatnot: Just buy up their stocks and bonds. When the government does that, it's called a sovereign wealth fund. Think of it like a big investment fund that buys up assets from the private sector and pays dividends to all permanent U.S. residents in the form of a universal basic income. Alaska actually already has a fund like this in place. If it's good enough for Levi Johnston, it's good enough for you.

5. A Public Bank in Every State

You know what else really blows? Wall Street. The whole point of a finance sector is supposed to be collecting the surplus that the whole economy has worked to produce, and channeling that surplus wealth toward its most socially valuable uses. It is difficult to overstate how completely awful our finance sector has been at accomplishing that basic goal. Let's try to change that by allowing state governments into the banking game.

There is only one state that currently has a public option for banking: North Dakota. When North Dakotans pay state taxes, the money gets deposited in the state's bank, which in turn offers cheap loans to farmers, students and businesses. The Bank of North Dakota doesn't make seedy, destined-to-default loans, slice them up inscrutably and sell them on a secondary market. It doesn't play around with incomprehensible derivatives and allow its executives to extract billions of dollars. It just makes loans and works with debtors to pay them off.

If that idea – or any of the others described in this piece – sounds good to you, there's a bitter political struggle to be waged. Let's get to work.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/five-economic-reforms-millennials-should-be-fighting-for-20140103


This is what passes for an article at Rolling Stone... fucking disgrace.

69360
01-07-2014, 04:05 PM
Millenials read Rolling Stone? Could have fooled me.

Can't tell if this article is serious or epic trolling.

Snew
01-07-2014, 04:07 PM
is this satire? please, please be satire...

VoluntaryAmerican
01-07-2014, 04:08 PM
It's forreal. I was just listening to the author "an Occupy wallstreet leader" on one of the money channels... I think CNBC.


Millenials read Rolling Stone? Could have fooled me.

Can't tell if this article is serious or epic trolling.


is this satire? please, please be satire...

Teenager For Ron Paul
01-07-2014, 04:24 PM
You know what really blows? This article. Seriously.

TheGrinch
01-07-2014, 04:31 PM
You know, I really do hope one day to see a world where we have eradicated so many of our problems and filled so many of our common interests that there is no need to work other than for pleasure and passion.

Until then, we're kinda gonna need people to be motivated and productive and give as much as we take, which can only happen in a system where there is incentive to produce and innovate. Socialism fails for exactly this reason. It subsidizes birth rather than providing the incentive to earn what you have.

We humans do need to rediscover our communal attitude and work toward greater goods more than we do, but trying to force that is going to fail every time.

Occam's Banana
01-07-2014, 06:24 PM
Millennials have been especially hard-hit by the downturn, which is probably why so many people in this generation (like myself) regard capitalism with a level of suspicion that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

A decade ago? Maybe. But not nine and a half decades ago ...


But that egalitarian impulse isn't often accompanied by concrete proposals about how to get out of this catastrophe. Here are a few things we might want to start fighting for, pronto, if we want to grow old in a just, fair society, rather than the economic hellhole our parents have handed us.

LMAO at the idea that you'll be likely to "grow old" in a such a society as you have here proposed.

They called it "gulag" when fools like you tried this before ...

Halo
01-07-2014, 06:46 PM
The communist manifesto is well represented in that article. As horrible as the impending collapse is likely to be, there is at least a little hope that the author and other delusionals will have a moment of clarity before they die screaming.

ZENemy
01-07-2014, 06:53 PM
The comments are pretty awake though.


Funny how these points sound a lot like what Lenin and Stalin implemented in the Soviet Union. I know from my time spent in 30 years in the work place that if people don't have to earn their keep they won't.

Tell this moron to move to Cuba or North Korea and let us know how it works out for him. By all means once he gets there to be sure to publically criticize the gov't, LOL



We should be fighting for Communism? sounds weird to me.


Progressives should understand that probably 10% of the "people" posting up here are paid internet shills. Reports have come out about private companies hiring folks to spread pro-rich, pro-capitalist talking points. There is actually a software program where one person can control multiple online "identities" to make it seem that the majority of people on an internet forum are right-wing. The reality is not quite so cut and dry. While the majority still leans rightward and claims to be more or less content with the status quo, that lead is slipping and socialism and leftist views are gaining traction.

Rudeman
01-07-2014, 07:17 PM
You know what really blows? This article. Seriously.


^^^^

Hey guys this thing blows, oh and this thing blows, and this thing blows. Someone should get him a thesaurus.

DamianTV
01-07-2014, 08:14 PM
Millenials read Rolling Stone? Could have fooled me.

Can't tell if this article is serious or epic trolling.

Millenials can read? Fooled me too.

Total products of the Indoctrination System.

fr33
01-07-2014, 08:32 PM
LOL my wife's hipster cousin (who is a millennial) gave her a subscription to Rolling Stone for 2 years. It goes in the trash on arrival.