PDA

View Full Version : Dad Files $130M Suit, Alleging His Son Was Unknowingly Put Up for Adoption




aGameOfThrones
01-02-2014, 09:21 PM
An unmarried Utah father has filed a $130 million federal lawsuit against his son's biological mother, claiming she put their son up for adoption without his knowledge.

In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court Friday, Jake Strickland alleges the boy's mother, Whitney Pettersson Demke "essentially kidnapped" his son shortly after birth three years ago. Strickland alleges Demke, the adoptive parents and the adoption agency conspired in an "illegal, deceit-ridden infant adoption" that deprived him of his son, according to the suit.

"My son doesn't deserve to go through this. I don't deserve to go through this. This has been very heart-wrenching for everyone involved," Strickland says on GetBabyJack.com, a website explaining his fight to gain custody of the son that he has never met.

Pettersson and LDS Family Services, which facilitated the adoption, didn't respond to ABC News' request for comment.

Strickland and Demke met in 2009 but broke up before the baby was born in December 2010, according to court documents obtained by ABC News. But Strickland contends they remained friendly and agreed to share custody. Strickland says they even decided to name the baby boy Jack.

"I helped her with as much as I could. Gave her money whenever she needed it," Strickland explains in a video posted on the website.

The baby was born Dec. 29, 2010 and was put up for adoption the next day by Pettersson, Strickland says in the suit. Pettersson, according to Strickland, didn't tell him about the adoption until one week later.

"She had my son without telling me and put him up for adoption the next day," Strickland explains in the video.

Days later, Pettersson confessed that she had been planning to put Jack up for adoption from the beginning, according to Strickland.
"The moment that I found out, I filed for paternity, which was already too late. I know I should have filed earlier, but I trusted her," Strickland says.

But there was still another surprise waiting for Strickland, who thought Pettersson was divorced. But, in fact, she was still married to her estranged husband, who under Utah law, was presumed the father of Jack and had the right to give custody away.

Soon after Strickland learned the adoption was completed, he filed a paternity claim. That battle is still being fought in Utah's 2nd District Court.

Strickland's suit is challenging the boundaries of an unmarried father's rights in Utah.http://gma.yahoo.com/dad-files-130m-suit-alleging-son-unknowingly-put-141914116--abc-news-topstories.html?vp=1

Origanalist
01-02-2014, 09:27 PM
I wish him well, but hold out no hope.

http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg563/DouglasPaul/ATT555.jpg

Brian4Liberty
01-02-2014, 10:07 PM
$130 million? Is the Mormon Church also a defendant in the lawsuit? Doubt the mother will have that money.

On the other hand, if the roles were reversed and the Mother was suing for support, you can be sure that the Court would be taking a good portion of his paycheck.

Could be a religious freedom case. Do LDS rules supersede a father's rights? LDS likes to adopt out babies (to LDS members) born to single mothers.

Smart3
01-03-2014, 12:56 AM
The LDS strikes again.

Seriously he does have a say. It's not her body anymore.

LibertyEagle
01-03-2014, 02:29 AM
If they had been married, this wouldn't have been an issue.

tod evans
01-03-2014, 03:56 AM
Best of luck Mr. Strickland I'm in your court.

Origanalist
01-03-2014, 04:15 AM
If they had been married, this wouldn't have been an issue.

True, except for this part;


But there was still another surprise waiting for Strickland, who thought Pettersson was divorced. But, in fact, she was still married to her estranged husband, who under Utah law, was presumed the father of Jack and had the right to give custody away.