PDA

View Full Version : Couple spends month in prison. Lab results indicate substance was soap.




phill4paul
12-16-2013, 08:50 AM
If you're doing nothing wrong.........


Drug suspects had soap, not cocaine bricks
Pair spent month in prison before lab results came back.


December 13, 2013|By Manuel Gamiz Jr., Of The Morning Call

When a state trooper pulled the couple over along Interstate 78 last month, he said he stopped them because they were going 5 miles over the speed limit and hugging the side of the lane.

The trooper said he smelled marijuana. The driver of the new Mercedes-Benz, 26-year-old Annadel Cruz, told him she had smoked the drug before she left New York City, but had not done so in the car.

The trooper asked to search the car, and Cruz consented. When the trooper found two plastic-wrapped packages in the trunk of the car, Cruz told him they contained soap she had made herself.

The trooper field-tested them and Cruz and her friend, 30-year-old Alexander Bernstein, spent the next month in Lehigh County Prison after being arrested on cocaine-trafficking charges.

They got out this week after the Lehigh County district attorney's office dropped the charges because a state police lab tested the packages and found they contained boric acid or soap.

Attorneys for the couple are questioning the investigation, accusing the trooper of profiling the couple and botching the field test.

"I think it is a nice car with out-of-state plates and a Hispanic female behind the wheel" that prompted the traffic stop, said Josh Karoly, who represents Bernstein. "If it was me driving that car, this wouldn't have happened."

Cruz's attorney, Robert Goldman, said, "After this, everyone should pause about jumping to conclusions when a field test is said to be positive by law enforcement. There are people going to jail on high bail amounts based upon these field tests."

Bernstein was sent to prison under $500,000 bail and Cruz under $250,000 bail by District Judge Jacob Hammond.

Field tests are used by police departments to test substances believed to be drugs at suspected crime scenes. A sample of the substance is mixed with a liquid, causing a reaction and change in color that will indicate if it is an illegal drug, Karoly said.

That substance will then be sent to the state police lab for further analysis and testing.

Karoly said he believes the field test either didn't happen, it was lied about or something is wrong with how it was done.

"A young man spent a month in jail, spent a substantial amount of money to get out of jail and missed Thanksgiving with his 17-month-old son," he said. "To do that on a field test, we better be darn sure that these field tests are accurate."

Bernstein's bail was posted Tuesday, a day before the district attorney's office called to let him know they were dropping charges. Cruz, a community college student, was released from prison Wednesday, Goldman said. Goldman said Cruz had no criminal record before the Nov. 13 stop in South Whitehall Township.

While his client is happy to be released, Goldman said it will take time to recover from the stigma of being incarcerated as a drug offender.

"Her name is all over the place, making light of her defense that she was just transporting soap," he said. "She was labeled online as a drug dealer, she was incarcerated with people who do commit crimes.

"It's going to take her a good deal of time to get her good name back," Goldman said.

According to a criminal complaint:

A state trooper stopped Cruz, who was driving a new Mercedes-Benz, on westbound I-78 near the Cedar Crest Boulevard exit because she was approaching 60 mph in a 55 mph zone and was riding a traffic line for about a half-mile.

When questioned, Cruz told the trooper the car was a rental and they were driving from New York to Florida. The trooper told her he smelled marijuana and she said she had smoked earlier in the day, but not in the car. She gave police permission to search the car.

Bernstein told police he had a bag in the trunk and gave police permission to search it. In the bag, the trooper found two brick-size packages, which were covered in clear plastic wrap and red tape.

Cruz told police the packages contained soap she had made, but a field test revealed that the substance was cocaine. The packages weighed 5.2 pounds. Police said they also found a small amount of marijuana in Cruz's bra.

The couple were charged with possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession of cocaine, conspiracy and possession of drug paraphernalia. Cruz also was charged with possession of a small amount of marijuana, disregarding traffic lanes and speeding.

The district attorney's office would only confirm that the state police lab determined the substance found in the car turned out to be soap, leading to the charges being withdrawn Thursday.

Attempts to reach state police Friday were unsuccessful.

Both attorneys accused state police of profiling.

Goldman said police stopped his client for barely going past the speed limit and getting close to the line, something almost every driver on the highway does at some point.

"Anybody who drives under 60 miles an hour on I-78 has the chance of getting rear-ended," Goldman said. "It was one of the worst probable causes for stopping."

Goldman said his client was taking the soap to a sister in Florida. He described Bernstein as her friend.

Karoly said this case is an example of rushing to conclusions.

"We are so cynical that we don't believe people," Karoly said. "We don't give people the benefit of the doubt."

Neither attorney said he has discussed civil litigation.

manuel.gamiz@mcall.com

610-820-6595

http://articles.mcall.com/2013-12-13/news/mc-state-police-arrest-cocaine-was-hand-soap-20131213_1_trooper-drug-suspects-soap

Danke
12-16-2013, 09:20 AM
Stupid is...

aGameOfThrones
12-16-2013, 09:20 AM
When questioned, Cruz told the trooper the car was a rental and they were driving from New York to Florida. The trooper told her he smelled marijuana and she said she had smoked earlier in the day, but not in the car. She gave police permission to search the car.

Bernstein told police he had a bag in the trunk and gave police permission to search it. In the bag, the trooper found two brick-size packages, which were covered in clear plastic wrap and red tape.


That is why you failed. Shut The Fuck Up!

mczerone
12-16-2013, 09:30 AM
If you're doing nothing wrong.........



http://articles.mcall.com/2013-12-13/news/mc-state-police-arrest-cocaine-was-hand-soap-20131213_1_trooper-drug-suspects-soap

1. What's the philosophical difference between soap and cocaine, anyway?

2. Someone needs to challenge the admissibility of highly subjective and suspect detection methods like "officer smells," "dog alerts," and unreliable field tests.

3. Always deny the search. Call their bluff and make them get a warrant. If you're in a small town/county, they'll have to call a (sleeping) Judge at home to review the evidence. This will also give you another recourse to challenge your charges or another basis for a civil claim. Finally, it might give you grounds to throw out evidence against you if it was collected after you denied the search, but before the warrant issued.

4. This isn't a case of "rushing to conclusions" - it's a case of ALL MUNDANES ARE GUILTY, ESPECIALLY THE POOR, NON-WHITE, AND OUT-OF-TOWNERS.

mczerone
12-16-2013, 09:34 AM
That is why you failed. Shut The Fuck Up!

Any sympathy for the victim? Most people don't know that they can tell a cop "no."

Also, chances are good that the cop would have gotten a warrant anyway, and the result would have been the same.

pcosmar
12-16-2013, 09:37 AM
Any sympathy for the victim? Most people don't know that they can tell a cop "no."

Also, chances are good that the cop would have gotten a warrant anyway, and the result would have been the same.

Yup,, a warrant is a radio call and rubber stamp away.

mczerone
12-16-2013, 09:44 AM
Yup,, a warrant is a radio call and rubber stamp away.

Now, now... We all know that "due process" is followed and a man in a robe trusted and learned jurist has expertly examined the evidence to determine that a crime has been committed.

It's never the case that a half-asleep guy gives a verbal okay over the phone for a third-shift county employee to stamp his name to whatever the cops request. That'd be tyranny.

eduardo89
12-16-2013, 09:49 AM
3. Always deny the search. Call their bluff and make them get a warrant. If you're in a small town/county, they'll have to call a (sleeping) Judge at home to review the evidence. This will also give you another recourse to challenge your charges or another basis for a civil claim. Finally, it might give you grounds to throw out evidence against you if it was collected after you denied the search, but before the warrant issued.


If the cop claimed to smell pot, he had reasonable suspicion to search the car without her consent, including the trunk. Fucked up laws, I know.

mczerone
12-16-2013, 09:54 AM
If the cop claimed to smell pot, he had reasonable suspicion to search the car without her consent, including the trunk. Fucked up laws, I know.

I realize such, but make him say it. If he's lying, there's the (remote) possibility of accountability or barring of evidence.

pcosmar
12-16-2013, 10:02 AM
If the cop claimed to smell pot, he had reasonable suspicion to search the car without her consent, including the trunk. Fucked up laws, I know.
Show me that in the constitution.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

Any laws that violate the supreme Law of the Land,, is null and void.

mczerone
12-16-2013, 10:12 AM
Show me that in the constitution.



Any laws that violate the supreme Law of the Land,, is null and void.

Try telling that to the people trying to open your wallet and throw you in a cage. Someone wrote a rule down, and they'll enforce it until either (1) their fundamental legitimacy is on the line or (2) (more likely, but still improbable) a certain panel of robed politicians says the rule is wrong.

eduardo89
12-16-2013, 10:17 AM
Show me that in the constitution.

Cops and the courts care about the constitution?

donnay
12-16-2013, 10:21 AM
The cop should have snorted some to make doubly sure it was cocaine. :rolleyes:

Christian Liberty
12-16-2013, 10:47 AM
Cops and the courts care about the constitution?


Those that don't should be executed on conviction.

aGameOfThrones
12-16-2013, 10:52 AM
Any sympathy for the victim? Most people don't know that they can tell a cop "no."

Also, chances are good that the cop would have gotten a warrant anyway, and the result would have been the same.


NO! ha. She had nothing to hide.

Red Green
12-16-2013, 12:18 PM
I realize such, but make him say it. If he's lying, there's the (remote) possibility of accountability or barring of evidence.

Absolutely. If you consent, there is no hope of throwing out any evidence they gather as a result of the search. If you insist on a warrant, the pig will either a) assert probable cause to search without a warrant or b) call in for a warrant. If he proceeds without a warrant, there is a chance a court will find the search illegal and any evidence will be out the door as a result. If he calls in for a warrant, there is a possibility of there being inconsistencies with the written record of the warrant and the search, which could lead to evidence being tossed. Never, ever, ever, ever admit to anything (ie do not answer any questions) and never consent to searches or tests.

As for how to not answer questions, learn to be the one asking questions. Like when a pig pulls you over and asks "Where you going tonight?", you should reply with "Did you pull me over to ask me where I was going officer?". The only thing coming out of your mouth should be a question, period. You should make no statements period, other than you are asserting your 4th and 5th amendment rights and would like counsel present.

Barrex
12-16-2013, 12:27 PM
If you have nothing to hide.... STFU YOU ARE GOING TO JAIL ANYWAY!!! :cool: