PDA

View Full Version : US Drone Strikes US Navy Ship By Mistake




Lucille
11-17-2013, 01:06 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-17/us-drone-strikes-navy-ship-mistake


While hardly as dramatic as last week's revelation that Syrian Al-Qaeda cannibals apologized after chopping off the head of one of their CIA-funded "rebels" by mistake, the news that a US drone struck a US missile cruiser during training off Southern California, causing two minor injuries is maybe even more embarrassing. After all, with Al-Qaeda one can at least make a legitimate case of a friendly fire, er, beheading incident. When it comes to the coast off SoCal, it will be difficult to suggest the Chinese (or Russian) navies were running sorties next to the surfers off Point Mugu.


The Navy says an aerial target drone malfunctioned and struck a guided missile cruiser during training off Southern California, causing two minor injuries.

Lt. Lenaya (luh-NEY-yah) Rotklein of the U.S. Third Fleet said the accident on the USS Chancellorsville happened Saturday afternoon while the ship was testing its combat weapons system off Point Mugu.

She said two sailors were treated for minor burns after the ship was struck. She said the ship was heading back to Naval Base San Diego so that officials can assess the damage.

Rotklein said the drone was being used to test the ship's radar. She had no immediate information on whether the drone has malfunctioned before.

About 300 crew members were aboard the ship.

The Navy was investigating the cause of the drone malfunction.

Syrian "hackers" to be blamed shortly (just like in the case of healthcare.gov), as the time for Obama's internet kill switch "put option" is long overdue.

VoluntaryAmerican
11-17-2013, 01:10 PM
One just crashed in a lake too.

RM918
11-17-2013, 02:10 PM
Would you entrust a device capable of deploying hellfire missiles to Windows? Do you really think the US Government can do any better?

acptulsa
11-17-2013, 02:21 PM
Would you entrust a device capable of deploying hellfire missiles to Windows? Do you really think the US Government can do any better?

No.

But just because the government is blaming the machine doesn't mean the machine is to blame. After all, the operator wasn't looking out the canopy. He or she was squinting at a computer monitor.

When John McCain set the deck of the U.S.S. Forest Fir...er, I mean Forrestal on fire with a wet start and dumped a drop tank full of kerosene on it, the Navy did his daddy the admiral a favor and blamed it on a missile too.

enhanced_deficit
11-17-2013, 03:28 PM
Will wait till all the facts come out to know wether it was hacked or not, too soon to speculate imo.

GunnyFreedom
11-17-2013, 04:01 PM
just friendly collaterals in the US Drone Wars. Man and machine all performed their duties bravely. Assemble tomorrow for a pinning ceremony for the fallen drone. Oh,, and send the boy back to his rack when he can walk again.

alucard13mm
11-17-2013, 04:46 PM
False Flag test?

FindLiberty
11-17-2013, 05:01 PM
Fail and Fail (drone and ship's defense system).

XNavyNuke
11-17-2013, 06:51 PM
BQM-74's are used to replicate attacks by sea skimming ASM's. They are jet powered aircraft capable of flying just a few feet above the water and are subsonic. When testing radar systems its necessary to direct them right at the ship so that they present the lowest radar cross section and are just above the water so that back scatter can make them harder to detect. This is a normal evolution off the coast of So Cal. There are lots of target drones on the open floor there. This one is supposed to veer off before contact. Sounds like a mechanical control surface failure.

I'm sure Pravda's speculation will be much more entertaining.

XNN

RonPaulGeorge&Ringo
11-17-2013, 07:13 PM
This is still a popular theory for TWA800 -- Navy training accident.

69360
11-17-2013, 07:25 PM
Think what it will be like when they have thousands of these things overhead in the US every day.

GunnyFreedom
11-17-2013, 07:58 PM
BQM-74's are used to replicate attacks by sea skimming ASM's. They are jet powered aircraft capable of flying just a few feet above the water and are subsonic. When testing radar systems its necessary to direct them right at the ship so that they present the lowest radar cross section and are just above the water so that back scatter can make them harder to detect. This is a normal evolution off the coast of So Cal. There are lots of target drones on the open floor there. This one is supposed to veer off before contact. Sounds like a mechanical control surface failure.

I'm sure Pravda's speculation will be much more entertaining.

XNN

I agree with this. Collateral damage is situational. They were in that situation because... One or a few systemic malfunctions did this. We are running our servicemen too hard. QC's will be missed, mistakes will be made. We are asking for trouble and not doing the men any favors.

idiom
11-18-2013, 12:55 AM
"Why do we even have that button?"

fr33
11-18-2013, 01:25 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bOQitInC84