Goldman Sachs Has Chosen Our Next President

[Ronin Truth]

Goldman Sachs Has Chosen Our Next President

lewrockwell.com

lrc-blog/goldman-sachs-has-chosen-our-next-president/


Thomas DiLorenzo


http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc- (http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-) blog/goldman- sachs- has- chosen- our- next- president/

Drum roll please . . . . . . . . . . it’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hillary Clinton!, whom

Goldman just paid $400,000 for two speeches.

Is there a more money- grubbing woman anywhere in America? There’s no one more greedy and obsessed with money than a socialist ideologue.

3:00 pm CDT on October 31, 2013

[FrankRep]

George Bush's speaking fee – $150,000 a pop
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2009/03/02/bush-speaking-fee-150000-a-pop/

Hillary Clinton is only 50,000 more.

[Romulus]

Divide up libertarians and R's enough and she will be our next prez.

[twomp]

Divide up libertarians and R's enough and she will be our next prez.
You say that as if the libertarians and R's were the same group. Remember the R's say they don't need the libertarians.

[Romulus]

You say that as if the libertarians and R's were the same group. Remember the R's say they don't need the libertarians.

I know.... will they sing a different tune this time? Probably not. Most are just D's parading as R's anyway. They're the sacrifice.

[Ronin Truth]

George Bush's speaking fee – $150,000 a pop
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2009/03/02/bush-speaking-fee-150000-a-pop/

Hillary Clinton is only 50,000 more.

We'll probably know for sure about POTUS 2016 when Bilderberg makes it's choice.:p Bush had his shots. ;)

[Ronin Truth]

Divide up libertarians and R's enough and she will be our next prez.

The libertarians don't vote and the Libertarians are miniscule in number and will vote for the Libertarian candidate. The independents usually decide most of the national elections.

[Ronin Truth]

You say that as if the libertarians and R's were the same group. Remember the R's say they don't need the libertarians.

It's good they don't need them because they ain't got them.:D

[Ronin Truth]

I know.... will they sing a different tune this time? Probably not. Most are just D's parading as R's anyway. They're the sacrifice.

Sorry, your reasoning there kinda lost me.:confused:

[RJB]

$150,000.00 to hear Bush speak!!!


I'd actually pay money to have both Bush and Clinton to shut the hell up.

[Ronin Truth]

$150,000.00 to hear Bush speak!!!


I'd actually pay money to have both Bush and Clinton to shut the hell up.

Maybe pay even more to silence both Clintons. ;):D

[LibertyEagle]

You say that as if the libertarians and R's were the same group. Remember the R's say they don't need the libertarians.

And the libertarians don't think they need the Republicans. Sounds like stupidity all around.

[Feeding the Abscess]

And the libertarians don't think they need the Republicans. Sounds like stupidity all around.

When, in the history of the libertarian movement, has the republican party/conservatives ever followed and supported the libertarians, instead of demanding it go the other way?

[NIU Students for Liberty]

When, in the history of the libertarian movement, has the republican party/conservatives ever followed and supported the libertarians, instead of demanding it go the other way?

Outside of maybe Grover Cleveland, when in the history of any party have Democrats or Republicans pushed fourth a platform that was remotely libertarian?

[twomp]

And the libertarians don't think they need the Republicans. Sounds like stupidity all around.
Why should libertarians support Republicans? That's like saying libertarians should support Democrats because we agree with them on certain issues??

[Romulus]

Well I for one welcome our new commie Clinton prez..... we can bicker R vs L for another 4 years!

Finish taking over the damn R party already.... finish what Ron started.

[FrankRep]

When, in the history of the libertarian movement, has the republican party/conservatives ever followed and supported the libertarians, instead of demanding it go the other way?

Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, etc...

[Zippyjuan]

Ron Paul is only $50,000 a speech. He can be bought much more cheaply. http://www.usatoday.com/story/onpolitics/2012/12/12/ron-paul-speakers-bureau-congress/1764109/


When Texas Rep. Ron Paul retires in a few weeks, he'll follow one of the tried and true paths out of Congress to the paid speakers' circuit.

Paul, who delivered babies before getting elected, has signed up with the Greater Talent Network, one of the top agencies that book celebrity speakers.

"At the podium, Dr. Paul delivers a candid look at the dysfunctional American political system," reads the company's promotional material on the former GOP presidential candidate. "Using anecdotes from his 23 years in Congress, he highlights the need for a limited government and more personal liberties."

Paul's message drew a passionate following on the campaign trail, especially from college students.

BuzzFeed reports Paul's fee will be $50,000 per appearance. The website says the Texan would make more per appearance than ex-Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee and Jon Huntsman, one of Paul's former rivals and an ex-Utah governor. Al Gore and Arnold Schwarzenegger pull down six figures per speech.

The Greater Talent Network says Paul will be available after Jan. 7 -- four days after the term ends for members of the 112th Congress.

[Feeding the Abscess]

Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, etc...

Oh wow, I totally forgot all of the bills that have passed that were authored by them.

[vita3]

Libertarians, honest r's, honest d's & Indies, can easily win in 2016.

Collection of the best, only way.

[mosquitobite]

Hillary Clinton is also the key note speaker at the National Association of Realtors convention.
Good to know how much she charges...

[enhanced_deficit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zw-1Eu4v_g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zw-1Eu4v_g

[pcosmar]

LOL.

at the people that still thing there is any difference between "R" and "D".

Same party,, same agenda,, slightly different rhetoric.

[AlexAmore]

Libertarians, honest r's, honest d's & Indies, can easily win in 2016.

Collection of the best, only way.
http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/480811.jpg
Here in America we share.

[fr33]

Ron Paul is only $50,000 a speech. He can be bought much more cheaply. http://www.usatoday.com/story/onpolitics/2012/12/12/ron-paul-speakers-bureau-congress/1764109/

And he's "bought" by people who are not Goldman Sachs. I'm always amazed by people on these forums who, when the subject of Goldman Sachs comes up, seem ignorant of the role they play in this country and what they represent.

[juvanya]

I honestly dont think she will run. And if she doesnt, the Democrats are cooked and its probably Rands to lose.

[FrankRep]

And he's "bought" by people who are not Goldman Sachs. I'm always amazed by people on these forums who, when the subject of Goldman Sachs comes up, seem ignorant of the role they play in this country and what they represent.

People who work for Goldman Sachs are people too. The government is the problem, not Goldman Sachs.

[Todd]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zw-1Eu4v_g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zw-1Eu4v_g



I agree with nothing that man stands for, but he is not ignorant of the problems.

[Ronin Truth]

People who work for Goldman Sachs are people too. The government is the problem, not Goldman Sachs.

The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.
Lord Acton (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/quotes/authors/l/lord_acton.html)