PDA

View Full Version : Cop Charged for Killing Secured Dog is Acquitted by Jury




SeanTX
10-04-2013, 02:30 PM
Once again, a group of citizens refuses to hold law enforcement accountable. At least he got a nice long paid-vacation out of the deal.

http://www.examiner.com/article/dog-killing-cop-acquitted-community-outraged



Dog killing cop acquitted; community outraged (Video)


The Colorado police officer responsible for the death of a family dog named Chloe has been acquitted by a jury, the Denver Post reported October 3.

An Adams County jury deliberated for around three hours on Wednesday before handing down their verdict: Commerce City Police Officer Robert Price was acquitted. Examiner reporter Penny Eims covered the story here.

Price had been on paid leave since the November 24,2012 incident.

What image has this verdict projected for other cases yet to go to trial? This was a "special" case, where fortunately there was video evidence of everything that happened at Chloe's home that fateful afternoon.

The video showed how Chloe was secured on a catch pole, yet officer Price decided to end her life.

Prosecutors argued that officers who testified that Chloe was vicious and aggressive couldn't be trusted because the video showed Chloe as frightened and submissive.

Defense attorneys had another story to tell. They said a video showing five minutes of a half hour confrontation with Chloe wasn't enough to show she wasn't aggressive. They reportedly showed still images from the video showing Chloe moving toward the officers.

Chloe was on the end of a catch pole. How close could she have gotten at the end of a long stick? Why was it necessary to shoot this dog not once, but five times, resulting in her death?

SNIP

phill4paul
10-04-2013, 02:32 PM
Yep, it's ridiculous.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?429340-Was-there-any-doubt-Cop-acquitted-after-shooting-dog-on-catch-pole

Acala
10-04-2013, 02:35 PM
Amazing there was even a prosecution.

Remember, the standard of proof in a criminal case is supposed to be VERY high. The dog owners might still prevail in a civil case. But the lack of damages are a problem.

SeanTX
10-05-2013, 02:27 PM
From the comments, interesting if true ...


Angrydave
• a day ago

This screams corruption louder than anything I have ever seen. The jury was loaded with municipal employees, and ex cops. The D.A. didn't mount a decent case against Price..they disallowed important testimony and evidence. This sets a disturbing precedence for future dog shootings.

Thor
10-05-2013, 02:29 PM
From the comments, interesting if true ...
Angrydave
• a day ago

This screams corruption louder than anything I have ever seen. The jury was loaded with municipal employees, and ex cops. The D.A. didn't mount a decent case against Price..they disallowed important testimony and evidence. This sets a disturbing precedence for future dog shootings.

Just-Us

helmuth_hubener
12-04-2013, 04:17 PM
Just-Us

Indeed. We simply cannot trust the government. They have a monopoly and are in it for themselves.

pcosmar
12-04-2013, 04:23 PM
From the comments, interesting if true ...

And now you know exactly why anyone that has ever been a victim of the system will never ever be allowed to serve on a jury. :(

FloralScent
12-04-2013, 04:24 PM
And now you know exactly why anyone that has ever been a victim of the system will never ever be allowed to serve on a jury. :(

Jury selection should be out of a hat.

phill4paul
12-04-2013, 04:25 PM
And now you know exactly why anyone that has ever been a victim of the system will never ever be allowed to serve on a jury. :(

No shit.

I've sat on jury selection.

"Peers" is a very loose connotation.

ZENemy
12-04-2013, 04:30 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOsN-P5abVg