PDA

View Full Version : Bombshell: Rebels Admit Responsibility for Chemical Weapons Attack




fearthereaperx
08-30-2013, 02:59 PM
Reported by Associated Press journalist DALE GAVLAK.

GAVLAK has been a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR).

Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in providing rebels, whom they have vehemently backed at every turn, with chemical weapons, is no surprise given the revelations earlier this week that the Saudis threatened Russia with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi unless they abandoned support for the Syrian President. (Snip)

“From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,” writes Gavlak.


http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/

fearthereaperx
08-30-2013, 03:03 PM
sorry repost

Petar
08-30-2013, 03:12 PM
Very interesting.

I like to think that there are non-evil elements of the global intelligence community that are working to get whatever truth out, despite the whole NWO agenda thing...

fearthereaperx
08-30-2013, 04:11 PM
Very interesting.

I like to think that there are non-evil elements of the global intelligence community that are working to get whatever truth out, despite the whole NWO agenda thing...

There was that story of 10 or so CIA people willing to go public to call out Cheney during one of the more heated media ramp-ups for attacking Iran.

DamianTV
08-30-2013, 04:31 PM
Front Page Worthy.

ladyjade3
08-30-2013, 04:50 PM
I always thought the "evidence" that the rebels could not have possibly launched an attack of that scale consisted of simply checking the receipts of all the nastiness we've given them:

Hmmmm... Let's see here. Light weapons, ammunition, anti-tank weapons... nope. No chemical weapons listed here. HAD to have been the regime.

anaconda
08-30-2013, 04:53 PM
So now we need to bomb Saudi Arabia.

twomp
08-30-2013, 04:55 PM
So now we need to bomb Saudi Arabia.

We'd have to ask Israel first if that's what they would like us to do.

anaconda
08-30-2013, 07:45 PM
We'd have to ask Israel first if that's what they would like us to do.

Jennifer Rubin has volunteered to go ask for us.

KEEF
08-30-2013, 07:58 PM
So now we need to bomb Saudi Arabia.

Ha, Ha, Ha, now that is funny. Although if we did that back in 02, since TPTB say 9/11 wasn't an inside job, then maybe we wouldn't have ended up in Iraq and Afghanistan... although we would then be spending close to $30 a gallon though.

Who am I kidding though, a Saudi prince could walk right up to the President and kick him in the nuts and it would be spun that we would now need to go bomb some third world CIA propped up dictator because of the kick.

fearthereaperx
08-31-2013, 12:54 PM
Looks like they just took the article down. wow.

Petar
08-31-2013, 01:15 PM
Here's a cached version from the "way back machine":

http://web.archive.org/web/20130830152123/http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/

Petar
08-31-2013, 06:00 PM
This should be on the front page.

thoughtomator
08-31-2013, 06:25 PM
Looks like they just took the article down. wow.

still there as I see it

JJ2
09-01-2013, 03:29 PM
Someone needs to get this to Rand Paul.

orenbus
09-02-2013, 03:19 AM
http://benswann.com/reports-saudi-prince-using-u-s-to-topple-assad-to-consolidate-own-power/

Also the question of the Rebels via Saudi Arabia being involved in the chem attack was put to the UN spokesman during a press conference yesterday in this video shown on cnn:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv9mHh1Nitg#t=18m10s

goRPaul
09-02-2013, 04:18 AM
I'd love to see Ben Swann do an episode of Full Disclosure on this.