PDA

View Full Version : Refusal to fire trigger-happy cop prompts mass-resignations




presence
08-18-2013, 06:14 PM
Las Vegas Sheriff’s refusal to fire trigger-happy cop prompts mass-resignations from civilian review panel

Resigning members say that officers are not held accountable thanks to union protection, saying

the review process is 'a farce'


August 18, 2013 (http://www.policestateusa.com/archives/199)
Doug Gillespie (http://www.policestateusa.com/archives/tag/doug-gillespie)



After an unarmed man was shot by Las Vegas Metro Police, a civilian review panel, responsible for making recommendations in these types of cases, reviewed the actions of police and made the recommendation that the offending officer be fired. To their astonishment, the officer was simply slapped on the wrist, prompting mass resignations of members of the civilian review board.

http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/LasVegas_ReviewPanel-300x168.jpg (http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/LasVegas_ReviewPanel.jpg)Robert Martinez (left), Glenn Rineheimer (center) and Sandra Eddy (right) talk to the media about their resignations (Elizabeth Watts/FOX5)




On Nov. 11, 2012, 22-year-old Lawrence Gordon was shot by Officer Jacquar Roston while investigating a domestic dispute. Roston shot Gordon when he reached for his hat, claiming that he believed it was a gun.


Gordon’s thigh bone in his right leg was shattered, reported the Las Vegas Review Journal (http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/crime-courts/sheriff-declines-fire-officer-involved-november-shooting). Gordon required emergency surgery, installation of a metal rod and eight bolts in his leg, and a blood transfusion. After a week in the hospital, Gordon was swimming in debt that was not covered by insurance. The hospital filed an $82,500 lien against Gordon.
The civilian “Use of Force Board” didn’t believe Roston was responsible enough to be maintained on the police force. They recommended Roston be fired, which the Las Vegas Review Journal (http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/crime-courts/unprecedented-move-las-vegas-police-board-recommends-firing-officer-involved)said was “an unprecedented move,” adding that, “discipline against an officer in a shooting situation is unusual,” citing dozens of officer-involved shootings and homicides in the last few years.


Instead of following the review board’s recommendation, Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie gave Roston an easy pass: 40 hours without pay, and some danger assessment training, reported CBS Las Vegas (http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2013/07/22/metro-wont-fire-officer-who-shot-unarmed-man/).


The review board was stunned. Within a week, six members of the board, including the co-chairman, had resigned in disgust.


“Nothing will change as long as the leadership bows to the (union),” said co-chair Robert Martinez to the Las Vegas Sun (http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/jul/31/mass-resignations-hit-metro-review-board-chairman-/). “That’s who is running the show.”


The union, known as the Police Protective Association was dismissive towards the resigning members, and defended the sheriff. “I think this is a group of people who didn’t understand,” said PPA Executive Director Chris Collins.


“I was thoroughly fooled,” Martinez said. “I thought it was going to change and it isn’t.”
http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/LasVegas_SheriffDougGillespie-300x200.jpg (http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/LasVegas_SheriffDougGillespie.jpg)Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie
(Source: Jerry Henkel / Las Vegas Review Journal)

“I am saddened by what I feel is your inability to maintain the integrity and credibility of the Critical Incident Review Process (CIRP),” Martinez wrote in a resignation letter (http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/22978702/robert-martinezs-resignation-letter) to the sheriff. “I can no longer support the Department’s consistent effort to minimize openness and transparency in the CIRP process.”


Martinez’s letter continued: “The Jacquar Roston board participants were presented with investigative files containing comprehensive background information, employee interviews and other information and those involved freely, openly and candidly expressed and discussed their impressions and opinions and then made their recommendation. With all these facts and opinions as evidence, you decided to set that information aside and render a decision that again supports the employee and ignore the conclusions of members of the civilian population specifically assigned to scrutinize these matters.”


Another board member who resigned, Glenn Rinehimer, said he became suspicious of the review process some time ago during another case which he perceived to be an unjustified shooting. He says that the civilian review board was “stacked” with former police officers who were uninterested in the facts and quickly voted the actions to be justified, reported the Las Vegas Sun (http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/jul/31/mass-resignations-hit-metro-review-board-chairman-/).


“At the end of the day, the officer might be sitting there smiling, knowing the sheriff might not fire him anyway,” Rinehimer said. “It’s a farce.”

http://www.policestateusa.com/archives/199


see also:

http://beatyourselfup.com/

susano
08-18-2013, 06:28 PM
So, these are involved citizens who give a damn. I wonder if they have a next move or that's the end of it. If it's the latter then the alternative is the people and their dogs keep getting shot by a criminal gang of thugs or not. As usual, there only seems to be one answer with respect to what can be done.

aGameOfThrones
08-18-2013, 06:49 PM
The union, known as the Police Protective Association was dismissive towards the resigning members, and defended the sheriff. “I think this is a group of people who didn’t understand,” said PPA Executive Director Chris Collins.

I think they get it.

Anti Federalist
08-19-2013, 06:44 AM
Oh, here I was thinking cops resigned.

That was the impression I got from the headline.

How silly of me.

Philhelm
08-19-2013, 06:52 AM
Oh, here I was thinking cops resigned.

That was the impression I got from the headline.

How silly of me.

I had thought the same thing, and had thought, "No way!" and was right.

fisharmor
08-19-2013, 06:55 AM
Yep, fooled here too. Came thinking "Gee, maybe every single one of them isn't a counterproductive sack of shit after all".

Sorry, I'm slipping this morning. That verbiage obviously isn't strong enough.

Root
08-19-2013, 07:34 AM
+1 more fooled, I knew it was too good to be true

jtap
08-19-2013, 08:20 AM
I came expecting a ruse. No cop would resign. THEY HAVE TO FEED THEIR KIDS AND THERE IS NO OTHER WAY!!!