PDA

View Full Version : NSA Collects 'Word for Word' Every Domestic Communication, Says Former Analyst




liberty2897
08-03-2013, 09:01 AM
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/government_programs/july-dec13/whistleblowers_08-01.html


Transcript
JUDY WOODRUFF: And we pick up on the continuing fallout from the revelations of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Last night, we debated the role of the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence court, which approves the government's requests to gather intelligence information on Americans.

Tonight, we have a conversation with three former NSA officials, a former inspector general and two NSA veterans who blew the whistle on what they say were abuses and mismanagement at the secret government intelligence agency.


William Binney worked at the NSA for over three decades as a mathematician, where he designed systems for collecting and analyzing large amounts of data. He retired in 2001. And Russell Tice had a two-decade career with the NSA where he focused on collection and analysis. He says he was fired in 2005 after calling on Congress to provide greater protection to whistle-blowers.

He claims the NSA tapped the phone of high-level government officials and the news media 10 years ago.

RUSSELL TICE, former National Security Agency analyst: The United States were, at that time, using satellites to spy on American citizens. At that time, it was news organizations, the State Department, including Colin Powell, and an awful lot of senior military people and industrial types.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, this is the early 2000s.


Watch more of the interviews with the ex-NSA analysts and former inspector general.
RUSSELL TICE: This was in 2002-2003 time frame. The NSA were targeting individuals. In that case, they were judges like the Supreme Court. I held in my hand Judge Alito's targeting information for his phones and his staff and his family.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Bill Binney, what was your sense of who was being targeted and why they were being targeted? And what was being collected, in other words?

WILLIAM BINNEY, former National Security Agency technical leader: Well, I wasn't aware of specific targeting like Russ was. I just saw the inputs were including hundreds of millions of records of phone calls of U.S. citizens every day. So it was virtually -- there wasn't anybody who wasn't a part of this collection of information.

So, virtually, you could target anybody in this country you wanted.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Both Binney and Tice suspect that today, the NSA is doing more than just collecting metadata on calls made in the U.S. They both point to this CNN interview by former FBI counterterrorism agent Tim Clemente days after the Boston Marathon bombing. Clemente was asked if the government had a way to get the recordings of the calls between Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his wife.

TIM CLEMENTE, former FBI counterterrorism agent: On the national security side of the house, in the federal government, you know, we have assets. There are lots of assets at our disposal throughout the intelligence community and also not just domestically, but overseas. Those assets allow us to gain information, intelligence on things that we can't use ordinarily in a criminal investigation.

All digital communications are -- there's a way to look at digital communications in the past. And I can't go into detail of how that's done or what's done. But I can tell you that no digital communication is secure.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Tice says after he saw this interview on television, he called some former workmates at the NSA.

RUSSELL TICE: Well, two months ago, I contacted some colleagues at NSA. We had a little meeting, and the question came up, was NSA collecting everything now? Because we kind of figured that was the goal all along. And the answer came back. It was, yes, they are collecting everything, contents word for word, everything of every domestic communication in this country.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Both of you know what the government says is that we're collecting this -- we're collecting the number of phone calls that are made, the e-mails, but we're not listening to them.

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, I don't believe that for a minute. OK?

I mean, that's why they had to build Bluffdale, that facility in Utah with that massive amount of storage that could store all these recordings and all the data being passed along the fiberoptic networks of the world. I mean, you could store 100 years of the world's communications here. That's for content storage. That's not for metadata.

Metadata if you were doing it and putting it into the systems we built, you could do it in a 12-by-20-foot room for the world. That's all the space you need. You don't need 100,000 square feet of space that they have at Bluffdale to do that. You need that kind of storage for content.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, what does that say, Russell Tice, about what the government -- you're saying -- your understanding is of what the government does once these conversations take place, is it your understanding they're recorded and kept?

RUSSELL TICE: Yes, digitized and recorded and archived in a facility that is now online. And they're kind of fibbing about that as well, because Bluffdale is online right now.

And that's where the information is going. Now, as far as being able to have an analyst look at all that, that's impossible, of course. And I think, semantically, they're trying to say that their definition of collection is having literally a physical analyst look or listen, which would be disingenuous.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But the government vehemently denies it is recording all telephone calls. Robert Litt is the general counsel in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He recently spoke at the Brookings Institution.

ROBERT LITT, NSA general counsel: We do not indiscriminately sweep up and store the contents of the communications of Americans or of the citizenry of any country. We do collect metadata, information about communications, more broadly than we collect the actual content of communications, but that's because it is less intrusive than collecting content and in fact can provide us information that helps us more narrowly focus our collection of content on appropriate foreign intelligence targets.

But it simply is not true that the United States government is listening to everything said by the citizens of any country.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Joel Brenner, who was the NSA's inspector general and then senior legal counsel, says the intelligence agency obeys the law and the directions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court.

JOEL BRENNER, former NSA inspector general: It's really important to understand that the NSA hasn't done anything, as I understand it and from all I know, that goes one inch beyond what it's been authorized to do by a court.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, tell us, how extensive is the NSA's collection of data on American citizens, on their phone calls, on their e-mails, on their use of the Internet?

JOEL BRENNER: This the program only involves telephony metadata, not e-mails, not geographic location information.

The idea that NSA is keeping files on Americans, as a general rule, just isn't true. There's no basis for believing that. The idea that NSA is compiling dossiers on people the way J. Edgar Hoover did in the '40s and '50s or the way the East German police did, as some people allege, that's just not true.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, we have been talking to a couple of former NSA employees and one of the allegations they make is that it's not just collecting this metadata on telephone conversations; it's recording those conversations and it's storing them and keeping them for possible future use.

JOEL BRENNER: I think you're talking about Mr. Tice and Mr. Binney.

Mr. Binney hasn't been at the agency since 2001. Mr. Tice hasn't been at the agency since 2005. They don't know what's going on inside the agency.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Another allegation we heard from them, from Mr. Tice, is that back as of the time before he left the NSA in the early 2000s, that there was spying going on, on news organizations, on Supreme Court justices, on presidential candidates, then Senator Barack Obama, on military leaders, top generals in the army.

JOEL BRENNER: Mr. Tice made the allegations you have just indicated having to do with the period before 2005, eight years ago. They're just coming out now. I wonder why.

The farther he gets from the period when he could have known what he was talking about, the more fanciful his allegations have become.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Brenner claims that oversight of information gathering has actually improved.

JOEL BRENNER: We have turned intelligence into a regulated industry in a way that none of our allies, even in Europe, have done.

We have all three branches of government now involved in overseeing the activities of the NSA, the CIA, the DIA, and our other intelligence apparatus. This is an enormous achievement.

MAN: Government has gone too far in the name of security, that the Fourth Amendment has been bruised.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Last week, one oversight proposal in Congress aimed at preventing the NSA from collecting date on phone calls was narrowly defeated, but some members are vowing to press for additional restrictions on the investigative agency.

Anti Federalist
08-03-2013, 09:39 AM
JOEL BRENNER: This the program only involves telephony metadata, not e-mails, not geographic location information.

The idea that NSA is keeping files on Americans, as a general rule, just isn't true. There's no basis for believing that. The idea that NSA is compiling dossiers on people the way J. Edgar Hoover did in the '40s and '50s or the way the East German police did, as some people allege, that's just not true.

Then the data is worthless.

So why are you doing it?

Either you are committing fraud on the taxpayers to the tune of billions of dollars a year, or you are a fucking liar.

There are no other options.

CaptUSA
08-03-2013, 09:42 AM
Either you are committing fraud on the taxpayers to the tune of billions of dollars a year, or you are a fucking liar.
I don't think this is multiple choice. Pretty sure it's "all of the above".

Anti Federalist
08-03-2013, 09:43 AM
I don't think this is multiple choice. Pretty sure it's "all of the above".

"Both" is an acceptable answer.

ClydeCoulter
08-03-2013, 11:02 AM
"Both" is an acceptable answer.

Appears to be the only answer.

libertarianMoney
08-03-2013, 11:41 AM
"MAN: Government has gone too far in the name of security, that the Fourth Amendment has been bruised."

What fourth amendment?

HOLLYWOOD
08-03-2013, 12:13 PM
They collect everything, they archive everything...

the NSA is the world's largest user of Data Storage...

IBM, HP, NetApp, EMC, Hitachi... $100s of millions is spent each year on Storage servers and archive systems.

Warlord
08-03-2013, 12:14 PM
They collect everything, they archive everything...

the NSA is the world's largest user of Data Storage...

IBM, HP, NetApp, EMC, Hitachi... $100s of millions is spent each year on Storage servers and archive systems.


And the national liars club still lie...

Cleaner44
08-03-2013, 01:23 PM
I love how Snowden has designed the release of information to expose a problem, watch the government people explain, deny and say the whole thing is very limited... and then the next release pushes it further causing another cycle of explanations and denials. I suspect this will have another round that will again expose the statist liars.

Brian4Liberty
08-03-2013, 02:24 PM
At that time, it was news organizations, the State Department, including Colin Powell, and an awful lot of senior military people and industrial types.
...
The NSA were targeting individuals. In that case, they were judges like the Supreme Court. I held in my hand Judge Alito's targeting information for his phones and his staff and his family.


And in the end, the only purpose for these systems is politics. Spy on political enemies, spy on political allies. J. Edgar Hoover and Stasi wet dream.

CPUd
08-03-2013, 03:33 PM
I love how Snowden has designed the release of information to expose a problem, watch the government people explain, deny and say the whole thing is very limited... and then the next release pushes it further causing another cycle of explanations and denials. I suspect this will have another round that will again expose the statist liars.

It's not Snowden anymore. It's Greenwald and the other 1 or 3 journalists who are releasing the stories.

WhistlinDave
08-03-2013, 03:48 PM
I love how Snowden has designed the release of information to expose a problem, watch the government people explain, deny and say the whole thing is very limited... and then the next release pushes it further causing another cycle of explanations and denials. I suspect this will have another round that will again expose the statist liars.

I agree. Their lying asses are going to be lying more and more, and they're going to keep getting caught lying more and more. Right now polls show that more than 50% of Americans believe Snowden is a whistleblower, not a traitor. I'd be really curious to see the polls a week from now, another couple weeks from now, and so on. Because I think more and more people are going to keep waking up to what fucking liars are running Big Brother.

limequat
08-03-2013, 05:25 PM
It's not Snowden anymore. It's Greenwald and the other 1 or 3 journalists who are releasing the stories.

Right, Greenwald is selectively releasing stories so as to cause as much embarassment as possible to the Obama administration. Shit's downright vindictive. And I like it.

Cleaner44
08-03-2013, 07:50 PM
It's not Snowden anymore. It's Greenwald and the other 1 or 3 journalists who are releasing the stories.

I realize that Geenwald is releasing the documents, but I believe that Snowden asked for it to be done this way. I may be wrong.

Mani
08-03-2013, 09:08 PM
Some people brush off snowden as some low level hacker who worked their for a few months and isnt qualified to say anything because he doesnt have a high school diplomna (as if that's so important).

But now how do you brush off these two guys saying the same EXACT things with 20 and 30 years of experience in the NSA???


And BTW....those guys said bluffdale is already online...