Tantaros: Rand Paul is right on foreign policy, Kristol & neocons are the new fringe

[jct74]

not that anyone here cares much what Andrea Tantaros says, but I just like that people are now calling neocons the new fringe element after that was what we were called for so long :p



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ

[TER]

Nice

[William R]

And she's on the Five!!! Good for her!!!

[Brett85]

And she was pretty hawkish a few years ago and pretty critical of Ron Paul.

[Sola_Fide]

Haha...the establishment is completely confused.

[Sola_Fide]

And she was pretty hawkish a few years ago and pretty critical of Ron Paul.

Don't worry...another big terrorist attack will get her to go back to Bush era neoconservatism.

[AuH20]

And she was pretty hawkish a few years ago and pretty critical of Ron Paul.

The world has turned on it's head in a few years.

[TER]

I am convinced (though I have no proof) that Rand was a major topic of discussion behind closed doors at Bilderberg in June and their paid establishment drones jumped the shark with this untimely and unwise coordinated attack on Paul. These attacks on Rand will morph into attacks against MANY MANY more people than just Rand, and the battle lines are being drawn.

That they are choosing so early to do so means they are running scared about his growing influence and political power. And they are now doing nothing but raising his stock even more not only within the changing GOP, but with disenfranchised liberals and others. That they are starting the primary battle so far away from the elections will allow plenty of time for the darkness they hide to be revealed by the light of truth.

Their plan B will be, of course, to destroy the party if need be, to ensure an establishment (read Hillary) win.

Let both parties be destroyed if it means for the truth to come out and our God-given liberties be defended.

[AuH20]

I am convinced (though I have no proof) that Rand was a major topic of discussion behind closed doors at Bilderberg in June and their paid establishment drones jumped the shark with this untimely and unwise coordinated attack on Paul. These attacks on Rand will morph into attacks against MANY MANY more people than just Rand, and the battle lines are being drawn.

That they are choosing so early to do so means they are running scared about his growing influence and political power. And they are now doing nothing but raising his stock even more not only within the changing GOP, but with disenfranchised liberals and others. That they are starting the primary battle so far away from the elections will allow plenty of time for the darkness they hide to be revealed by the light of truth.

Their plan B will be, of course, to destroy the party if need be, to ensure an establishment (read Hillary) win.

Let both parties be destroyed if it means for the truth to come out and our God-given liberties be defended.

That's the most likely outcome. They don't care about the Republican Party. It's a tool.

[TER]

She reads the comment sections. She sees the wind blowing. These are the signs we never saw, or rarely saw, with the MSM in the past with Ron Paul. This gives great hope for our cause.

[fr33]

Hell is frozen over. I'm amazed what hatred for Obama can do.

[AuH20]

Hell is frozen over. I'm amazed what hatred for Obama can do did.

Fixed. Obama has boiled the frog to such a degree that he's doing somersaults.

[TER]

I cannot wait until the first money bomb for Rand. I am saving up from now. We should start considering a date and ensure it is done by the grassroots.

[jtstellar]

was just reminded that hillary voted for iraq war then voted to fund it..

sole reason obama had initial advantage was because he voted against iraq war and appeared to run as anti war candidate scolding hillary on her iraq war votes.. hillary will never be president with that baggage alone

[eduardo89]

I cannot wait until the first money bomb for Rand. I am saving up from now. We should start considering a date and ensure it is done by the grassroots.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to TER again. :)

[Cleaner44]

Rand has the ability to successful sell Ron's ideas to the same people that just weren't buying it a few years ago. Rand turns the light bulb on for the average Republican voter. He is in the driver's seat and those that want to return to the policies of Bush are pursuing a hopeless cause.

[Brian4Liberty]

I am convinced (though I have no proof) that Rand was a major topic of discussion behind closed doors at Bilderberg in June and their paid establishment drones jumped the shark with this untimely and unwise coordinated attack on Paul. These attacks on Rand will morph into attacks against MANY MANY more people than just Rand, and the battle lines are being drawn.

That they are choosing so early to do so means they are running scared about his growing influence and political power. And they are now doing nothing but raising his stock even more not only within the changing GOP, but with disenfranchised liberals and others. That they are starting the primary battle so far away from the elections will allow plenty of time for the darkness they hide to be revealed by the light of truth.

Their plan B will be, of course, to destroy the party if need be, to ensure an establishment (read Hillary) win.

Let both parties be destroyed if it means for the truth to come out and our God-given liberties be defended.

Good possibility. And do you know that not one, but two major Networks have planned documentary mini-series about Hillary?

[Brian4Liberty]

not that anyone here cares much what Andrea Tantaros says, but I just like that people are now calling neocons the new fringe element after that was what we were called for so long :p



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ

Wow!

I am shocked. Not only is she calling out Kristol, but she is also calling them neo-cons. That is a major sea-change.

[Brian4Liberty]

I am convinced (though I have no proof) that Rand was a major topic of discussion behind closed doors at Bilderberg in June and their paid establishment drones jumped the shark with this untimely and unwise coordinated attack on Paul. These attacks on Rand will morph into attacks against MANY MANY more people than just Rand, and the battle lines are being drawn.

That they are choosing so early to do so means they are running scared about his growing influence and political power. And they are now doing nothing but raising his stock even more not only within the changing GOP, but with disenfranchised liberals and others. That they are starting the primary battle so far away from the elections will allow plenty of time for the darkness they hide to be revealed by the light of truth.

Their plan B will be, of course, to destroy the party if need be, to ensure an establishment (read Hillary) win.

Let both parties be destroyed if it means for the truth to come out and our God-given liberties be defended.

That really crystallized it. We have always known that the neo-conservative faction are fake Republicans, but it's really in our faces now. They want Hillary. They would accept Christie or Rubio or Jeb as a GOP candidate, but they have played this scenario out to the end, and they are helping Hillary now, so that they can get more leverage when she wins (as they predict and are working towards).

[Dary]

Wow!

I am shocked. Not only is she calling out Kristol, but she is also calling them neo-cons. That is a major sea-change.

IIRC, that is a label (Neo-con) that they actually gave themselves.

[helenpaul]

not that anyone here cares much what Andrea Tantaros says, but I just like that people are now calling neocons the new fringe element after that was what we were called for so long :p



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ

hot women for rand paul!! I LIKE IT!! im sure the fatties like rubio.

[AlexAmore]

Big support from Tantaros, Bolling, and kudos from Beckel. We got 3 out of 5....on the The Five.

[Peace&Freedom]

Some of the neocons are ground zero ringleaders like Kristol, while others are functionaries or water-carriers who adopted and promoted the views because, well, that what they thought "a mainstream conservative" is supposed to think based on what the leaders keep saying. Is Tantaros, Bolling et al burnt out from defending the neocon theology, and has Rand's compromise rhetoric given them enough cover to make the jump? Is it a rehash of Palin's finger-in-the-air patronizing of whichever GOP flavor is in the wind? Will it hold up through the next false flag? Time will tell.

[jkr]

VERY hotish

[JCDenton0451]

Some of the neocons are ground zero ringleaders like Kristol, while others are functionaries or water-carriers who adopted and promoted the views because, well, that what they thought "a mainstream conservative" is supposed to think based on what the leaders keep saying. Is Tantaros, Bolling et al burnt out from defending the neocon theology, and has Rand's compromise rhetoric given them enough cover to make the jump? Is it a rehash of Palin's finger-in-the-air patronizing of whichever GOP flor is in the wind? Will it hold up through the next false flag? Time will tell.

You have to be Zionist to be a true neocon - it's a necessary condition. Tantaros isn't one. She is just a TV eye candy and a talking head saying whatever her superiors tell her to say. Actually, I'm suprised that Ailes allows this. I though he and Murdoch were firmly in the neocon camp.

[Brian4Liberty]

IIRC, that is a label (Neo-con) that they actually gave themselves.

Of course. But then they tried to smear anyone who used the term. Luckily, people are starting to understand that it is a self-given name for a group of people who always want war and occupation, and don't care about the majority of issues important to conservatives, libertarians, and the GOP in general. Tantaros also makes it clear that she is including Bill Kristol, and not just his political minions like Lindsey Graham and John McCain.

[CaptUSA]

You understand that if they are able to get Hillary elected, they will focus all their blame on this movement in an attempt to isolate us from the seats of power in both parties?

If Rand wins the primary, he MUST win the general. To not do so would be disastrous.

[Brian4Liberty]

You understand that if they are able to get Hillary elected, they will focus all their blame on this movement in an attempt to isolate us from the seats of power in both parties?

If Rand wins the primary, he MUST win the general. To not do so would be disastrous.

And they haven't already thrown everything they can at us?

Rand could win the General.

[JCDenton0451]

You understand that if they are able to get Hillary elected, they will focus all their blame on this movement in an attempt to isolate us from the seats of power in both parties?

If Rand wins the primary, he MUST win the general. To not do so would be disastrous.

We are 10% of the Republican party electorate, and that figure is rising every year. Exactly how are they going to isolate us?

[georgiaboy]

Happened upon her interviewing Rand on the radio today and leaning his way. Never heard of her before, came here as soon as I could to search for her.

That's a Bingo. RPF never disappoints!

[JK/SEA]

Wow!

I am shocked. Not only is she calling out Kristol, but she is also calling them neo-cons. That is a major sea-change.

meh...she's probably just pissed her pedicure appointment was changed for next week.

[FSP-Rebel]

Frankly, even though it's great, none of this is new as she's been casually praising Rand for a while now. What is good is that her talk show is new as of this year and she's got a decent amount of stations plus she's hot, so throw another hefty ally in our column. And that's before her and her crew on The Five.

[Brian4Liberty]

Related tweets:


Andrea Tantaros (The Five) agrees with Rand Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ #StandWithRand #TeaParty #tcot #tlot #TheFive @SenRandPaul

https://twitter.com/USAB4L/status/362273942569877505


Andrea Tantaros (The Five) disagrees with Christie, Kristol & Krauthammer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ … #StandWithRand #TeaParty #tcot #tlot

https://twitter.com/USAB4L/status/362281431663259648

[JCDenton0451]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QILWEnufEs&feature=player_detailpage&t=75

[liveandletlive]

there's a saying...."Rats always desert a sinking ship"

[Peace&Freedom]

there's a saying...."Rats always desert a sinking ship"

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v484/1-stop/tantaros_zpsf99ba1df.jpg

That's one sexy rat.

[eduardo89]

That's one sexy rat.

Down boy!

Ps: http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/381989_474645562586563_964486209_n.jpg

[Right Wing]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QILWEnufEs&feature=player_detailpage&t=75

Exactly, her statement at the end of this clip is astonishing. Basically, she is saying do as we say or you will not be included in future debates. This reflects the hierarchy of the Republican party and how they are no more respectful of liberty than the Democrats. Bolling is also way off in this clip. He makes it sound as if Ron is saying this out of selfishness, that he won't support the party because he didn't get nominated. In reality, he is staying consistent in principle and respecting his supporters. Ron knows it goes beyond him. It is about the concept of liberty and principles and he refused to support a candidate who does not support liberty.

[Right Wing]

not that anyone here cares much what Andrea Tantaros says, but I just like that people are now calling neocons the new fringe element after that was what we were called for so long :p



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKRM728IyQ

Her rant is awesome and much different from the hawk she has been in the past. She said all the right things and seemed passionate. Time wil reveal how sincere she is and if she truly has awaken.

[KingRobbStark]

Rand is going to all the neocon parties and slipping the red pill into their drinks. Bravo Rand!

[Right Wing]

It must counteract the koolaid!

[Occam's Banana]

Sorry ... I'm just not thrilling to the "if a country becomes a threat to us, we turn it into a parking lot and we leave" thing ...

Except for the "nation building" crap, how is this substantively any different from the foreign policy of Kristol & Co.?