DamianTV
07-18-2013, 01:30 PM
http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/07/18/039226/the-cia-wants-to-know-how-to-control-the-climate
" The CIA is currently funding, in part, a $630,000 study on geoengineering, the science of using experimental techniques to modify Earth's climate. Scientists will study how humans might influence weather patterns, assess the potential dangers of messing with the climate, and investigate possible national security implications of geoengineering attempts. The study calls for information on two geoengineering techniques in particular, 'solar radiation management (SRM),' which refers to launching material into Earth's atmosphere to try and block the Sun's infrared radiation, limiting global temperature rise; and 'carbon dioxide removal (CDR),' taking carbon dioxide emissions out of the climate, which scientists have proposed doing through a variety of means, from structures that eat air pollution to capturing carbon emissions as they come out of smokestacks."
As much credibility as I think the source doesnt have, I think the credibility of the CIA is far far less, which would only serve to validate a less-than-credible source as being credible. Funny how that works.
Next up: Murder by killing all your crops with Drought!
" The CIA is currently funding, in part, a $630,000 study on geoengineering, the science of using experimental techniques to modify Earth's climate. Scientists will study how humans might influence weather patterns, assess the potential dangers of messing with the climate, and investigate possible national security implications of geoengineering attempts. The study calls for information on two geoengineering techniques in particular, 'solar radiation management (SRM),' which refers to launching material into Earth's atmosphere to try and block the Sun's infrared radiation, limiting global temperature rise; and 'carbon dioxide removal (CDR),' taking carbon dioxide emissions out of the climate, which scientists have proposed doing through a variety of means, from structures that eat air pollution to capturing carbon emissions as they come out of smokestacks."
As much credibility as I think the source doesnt have, I think the credibility of the CIA is far far less, which would only serve to validate a less-than-credible source as being credible. Funny how that works.
Next up: Murder by killing all your crops with Drought!