PDA

View Full Version : No men please, they're too heavy: Low-cost airline will only hire female cabin crew ...




donnay
07-01-2013, 06:45 PM
No men please, they're too heavy: Low-cost airline will only hire female cabin crew from now to save £330,000 a year on fuel

By Helen Lawson

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/30/article-2351916-1A969623000005DC-974_634x286.jpg
Low-cost airline GoAir is to only hire female flight attendants to save money on its fuel bill



An Indian low-cost airline is to only hire female flight attendants to save money on its fuel bill.

GoAir says that carrying only female cabin crew could save 30million rupees (£330,000) a year because they are 33lb to 44lb lighter on average than their male counterparts.


The company's 132 male flight attendants will not be sacked but there will be no additions to their ranks.

GoAir plans to add 80 aircraft to its 15-strong fleet by 2020, reports the Times of India, and will recruit 2,000 cabin crew and pilots.

It will also cut the size of its in-flight magazine and only fill its water tanks to 60 per cent capacity to try to make its planes lighter.

The company estimates that every extra pound in weight costs it one-and-a-half rupees (1.7p) per flying hour.

Chief executive Giorgo De Roni blamed the Indian rupee, which has dropped 27 per cent against the US dollar in the last year, for the need to cut costs.

'The rupee's fall has hurt the industry badly,' he told the newspaper.


'All major expenses — aircraft leasing, spare parts and fuel costs — are linked to the dollar.


'We are looking at every possible way of cost-cutting to remain profitable.'

De Roni said the new planes would have 'sharklets' - wingtip devices - to help reduce fuel burn by 5 per cent.

Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2351916/GoAir-Low-cost-airline-hire-female-cabin-crew-save-330-000-year-fuel.html

BAllen
07-01-2013, 06:51 PM
Why don't they use turbo props? Don't they burn like 30% less fuel?

amy31416
07-01-2013, 06:56 PM
Good for them--I bet male passengers will frequent their airline more often.

VoluntaryAmerican
07-01-2013, 07:08 PM
Smart move.

thoughtomator
07-01-2013, 07:11 PM
another major country with vital interest in de-linking from the Bernanke buck

mad cow
07-01-2013, 07:11 PM
Have the cabin crew wear skimpy uniforms to save even more weight.

heavenlyboy34
07-01-2013, 07:31 PM
Have the cabin crew wear skimpy uniforms to save even more weight.
:D Now yer thinkin! That would be an awesome business model.

IDefendThePlatform
07-01-2013, 07:39 PM
Didn't they used to weigh flight attendants back in the day?

limequat
07-01-2013, 08:32 PM
Not much different from using small jockeys in horse racing. As a libertarian, I say the requirement should be weight based not gender based. As a dude, I say ...giggity.

enhanced_deficit
07-01-2013, 08:37 PM
In the interest of saving planet from global warming and reduce green house gases, I can get behind this move.

limequat
07-01-2013, 08:38 PM
In the interest of saving planet from global warming and reduce green house gases, I can get behind this move.

Global warming is real...take off your shirt?

enhanced_deficit
07-01-2013, 08:39 PM
Global warming is real...take off your shirt?

Anything to protect environment and promote natural living.

Carson
07-01-2013, 09:02 PM
Titanium hand grips for the passengers that ride on top?

heavenlyboy34
07-01-2013, 09:34 PM
Anything to protect environment and promote natural living.<br>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16cWiWj--8E (NSFW, btw)

ghengis86
07-01-2013, 09:42 PM
Why don't they use turbo props? Don't they burn like 30% less fuel?

And travel 50% slower? I actually have no idea which is more efficient, just guessing.

BAllen
07-01-2013, 09:55 PM
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/news-propeller-power-turboprops-past-present-and-future

Found an article.........'For airlines that are forced to cut corners to stay afloat, turboprops look more and more attractive.'

fisharmor
07-01-2013, 09:59 PM
Why don't they use turbo props? Don't they burn like 30% less fuel?

Because if people didn't want to get there quickly they'd take a train.

GregSarnowski
07-01-2013, 10:23 PM
No way they would ever be able to get away with this in "the Land of the Free".

Heck even Hooters was successfully sued a few years back for refusing to hire a male server.

juleswin
07-01-2013, 10:28 PM
Smart move.

So am guessing just like Abercrombie & Finch, there wont be any fatties on staff and also those tiny women would work just fine when there happen to have a few rowdy passengers on board. Talk about being penny wise pound foolish all to save a few dozen dollars in fuel cost.

What an idiotic move this is.

Philhelm
07-02-2013, 04:30 AM
This is homophobia in disguise...