AngryCanadian
06-23-2013, 07:30 PM
Breaking Obama warns countries against Snowden travel,KSA Speeds Arms in Syria
U.S. warns countries against Snowden trave (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/24/us-usa-security-flight-idUSBRE95M02H20130624?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=992637)l
In a major embarrassment for President Barack Obama, an aircraft thought to have carried Snowden landed in Moscow on Sunday, and the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said he was "bound for the Republic of Ecuador via a safe route for the purposes of asylum."
Earlier, Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino, visiting Vietnam, tweeted: "The Government of Ecuador has received an asylum request from Edward J. #Snowden."
The Obama administration has also urged friendly Latin countries to stop Snowden.
In other embarrassment for President Barack Obama, Clinton's and Republicans whom urged Obama to send arms and intervene in Syria militarily none democratic country of Saudi Arabia has stepped up its arm flow to its brigades including the Islamic state (ISIS) which according to now they are gaining supposedly ground in Aleppo.
#Breaking Islamic state (ISIS) fighters are combing the Mengh airport,dozens of Assad regime elements killed
This is only one source of the claim today of course this wouldn't be possible if proven true without the aid of arms flow from Qatar and Saudi Arabia through an network of selected arm dealers in the region.
The embarrassment for President Barack Obama administration is when John Kerry went to the Doha Friends of Syria only 11 out of the 114 delegates were present the delegates wanted to take no part in the meetings. Germany and Italy were opposed on arming the FSA.
As Kerry failed to bring the delegates in order to bring arms into Syria to the FSA forces Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon at the usatoday wrote an Column are further pushing Obama including by adding ground forces. These same writers seem to be ignoring the public opinion.
Obama needs to act now on Syria: Column
U.S. must prepare for a multilateral peace force, including American troops. (http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/06/23/michael-doran-and-michael-ohanlon-on-syria-column/2450419/)
By all accounts, President Obama reached his recent decision to supply arms directly to Syrian opposition groups with great reluctance. The president clearly understands that while getting into a war is easy, getting out is hard. The example of Iraq no doubt weighs heavily on his mind. But he also learned the lesson firsthand in Libya. After signing on to a limited mission, he was quickly forced to increase the level of U.S. participation or face the prospect of a rebel defeat.
If Obama begins now to discuss the idea of a multinational force with his allies, he will make it easier to persuade them to support the rebels in a more coherent fashion.
Having established the broader political and military objectives and parameters for our intervention in advance, such steps could be considered without risking all-out war.
I fairly believe that Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon are both clueless when it comes to the regional conflict matter if they believe if that such steps could be considered without risking all-out war :rolleyes:
In further POVs they state.
In this respect, the president's reluctance to get involved has actually had a beneficial effect. It has dramatically demonstrated to America's allies that the U.S. is indeed the indispensable nation. In one way or another, Britain, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar — to name just six states — have all urged Obama to play a more robust leadership role.
This clamor for U.S. intervention is an entirely new factor in Middle Eastern affairs. It is also one that gives America much more opportunity to manage the risks of military intervention.
Both of these six states including the ones which the writers included Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar both of them arent even democratic so why have Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon even mentioned them? they are the ones whom have being arming the rebel heart eating forces since day but at the end of the article is pretty clear why they are sounding desperate.
Michael Doran and Michael O'Hanlon are senior fellows at the Brookings Institution.
Maybe its time for the American people to get rid of such Institutions. As they would cause harm to other countries and to the image of America.
U.S. warns countries against Snowden trave (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/24/us-usa-security-flight-idUSBRE95M02H20130624?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=992637)l
In a major embarrassment for President Barack Obama, an aircraft thought to have carried Snowden landed in Moscow on Sunday, and the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said he was "bound for the Republic of Ecuador via a safe route for the purposes of asylum."
Earlier, Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino, visiting Vietnam, tweeted: "The Government of Ecuador has received an asylum request from Edward J. #Snowden."
The Obama administration has also urged friendly Latin countries to stop Snowden.
In other embarrassment for President Barack Obama, Clinton's and Republicans whom urged Obama to send arms and intervene in Syria militarily none democratic country of Saudi Arabia has stepped up its arm flow to its brigades including the Islamic state (ISIS) which according to now they are gaining supposedly ground in Aleppo.
#Breaking Islamic state (ISIS) fighters are combing the Mengh airport,dozens of Assad regime elements killed
This is only one source of the claim today of course this wouldn't be possible if proven true without the aid of arms flow from Qatar and Saudi Arabia through an network of selected arm dealers in the region.
The embarrassment for President Barack Obama administration is when John Kerry went to the Doha Friends of Syria only 11 out of the 114 delegates were present the delegates wanted to take no part in the meetings. Germany and Italy were opposed on arming the FSA.
As Kerry failed to bring the delegates in order to bring arms into Syria to the FSA forces Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon at the usatoday wrote an Column are further pushing Obama including by adding ground forces. These same writers seem to be ignoring the public opinion.
Obama needs to act now on Syria: Column
U.S. must prepare for a multilateral peace force, including American troops. (http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/06/23/michael-doran-and-michael-ohanlon-on-syria-column/2450419/)
By all accounts, President Obama reached his recent decision to supply arms directly to Syrian opposition groups with great reluctance. The president clearly understands that while getting into a war is easy, getting out is hard. The example of Iraq no doubt weighs heavily on his mind. But he also learned the lesson firsthand in Libya. After signing on to a limited mission, he was quickly forced to increase the level of U.S. participation or face the prospect of a rebel defeat.
If Obama begins now to discuss the idea of a multinational force with his allies, he will make it easier to persuade them to support the rebels in a more coherent fashion.
Having established the broader political and military objectives and parameters for our intervention in advance, such steps could be considered without risking all-out war.
I fairly believe that Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon are both clueless when it comes to the regional conflict matter if they believe if that such steps could be considered without risking all-out war :rolleyes:
In further POVs they state.
In this respect, the president's reluctance to get involved has actually had a beneficial effect. It has dramatically demonstrated to America's allies that the U.S. is indeed the indispensable nation. In one way or another, Britain, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar — to name just six states — have all urged Obama to play a more robust leadership role.
This clamor for U.S. intervention is an entirely new factor in Middle Eastern affairs. It is also one that gives America much more opportunity to manage the risks of military intervention.
Both of these six states including the ones which the writers included Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar both of them arent even democratic so why have Michael Doran and Michael O’Hanlon even mentioned them? they are the ones whom have being arming the rebel heart eating forces since day but at the end of the article is pretty clear why they are sounding desperate.
Michael Doran and Michael O'Hanlon are senior fellows at the Brookings Institution.
Maybe its time for the American people to get rid of such Institutions. As they would cause harm to other countries and to the image of America.