PDA

View Full Version : Poll: Americans overwhelmingly oppose military intervention in Syria




RonPaulFanInGA
05-31-2013, 10:50 AM
http://www.gallup.com/poll/162854/americans-oppose-military-involvement-syria.aspx

DamianTV
05-31-2013, 05:11 PM
Guess that means it is time to invade Syria.

brandon
05-31-2013, 05:16 PM
Good news for them, we're just going to fight a proxy war instead.

tod evans
05-31-2013, 05:17 PM
Where is the "poll" that asks Americans if our country should wage unconstitutional war?

Fucking imbeciles!

Warlord
05-31-2013, 05:21 PM
Obama and the crazed, blood soaked neocons have a neat way of getting round domestic opposition

Addressed here:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?416191-Obama-pressured-EU-to-lift-arms-embargo-on-al-Qaeda-in-Syria

Antischism
05-31-2013, 05:54 PM
Obama and the crazed, blood soaked neocons have a neat way of getting round domestic opposition

Addressed here:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?416191-Obama-pressured-EU-to-lift-arms-embargo-on-al-Qaeda-in-Syria

Your boy Paul Broun co-sponsored the Syria Accountability and Liberation Act which is "A bill to strengthen sanctions against the Government of Syria, to enhance multilateral commitment to address the Government of Syria's threatening policies, to establish a program to support a transition to a democratically-elected government in Syria," in 2008. What's his stance now?

DamianTV
05-31-2013, 07:09 PM
War with Syria is a foregone conclusion. It is inevitable. All you'll hear from the MSM is what ever excuse they finally decide on using to justify their actions so that they do NOT have to respond to the demands of the people to NOT go to war.

Now, how do people feel about Military Intervention in Iran? Does that opinion change if those same people are told that Iran has not invaded another country for the last 200 years? Yet, since Iran is a stepping stone to being able to control Russia and China with an IMF issued currency, Iran at some point WILL be attacked, but first, Irans allies will be taken out. Hence why war with Syria is inevitable.

<insert excuse for war with Syria here>

brandon
05-31-2013, 07:20 PM
I don't see any chance of us deploying the military in Syria. The CIA and state department, backed by billions of tax payers dollars, will be just as effective at achieving their goals without any of the political fallout that goes along with a declared war.

supermario21
05-31-2013, 07:25 PM
31% of Republicans want war...guess Rand won't ever get those votes LOL.

phill4paul
05-31-2013, 07:26 PM
Doesn't matter. Politicians have moved beyond the poll. First, they moved beyond pillory. Now they don't even care about what the populace cares because the populace no longer pillories.

NIU Students for Liberty
05-31-2013, 07:39 PM
Yet they LITERALLY boo the Golden Rule...

HOLLYWOOD
05-31-2013, 07:49 PM
Good news for them, we're just going to fight a proxy war instead.Yeap... a Billion people around the planet protested Dubya W Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Condi CIRCUS of Lies going to WAR in Iraq... that didn't stop TPTB.

Washington District of Criminals is full of whores, megalomaniacs, psychopaths, and liars... they spent billions crafting the exact reason to go to war for special interest and the banking elites.

tod evans
05-31-2013, 07:52 PM
Yeap... a Billion people around the planet protested Dubya W Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Condi CIRCUS of Lies going to WAR in Iraq... that didn't stop TPTB.

Washington District of Criminals is full of whores, megalomaniacs, psychopaths, and liars... they spent billions crafting the exact reason to go to war for special interest and the banking elites.

http://www.twowheelforum.com/images/smilies/hang.gif Get a rope! :mad:

Warlord
05-31-2013, 08:32 PM
Your boy Paul Broun co-sponsored the Syria Accountability and Liberation Act which is "A bill to strengthen sanctions against the Government of Syria, to enhance multilateral commitment to address the Government of Syria's threatening policies, to establish a program to support a transition to a democratically-elected government in Syria," in 2008. What's his stance now?

Warlord would hope he's changed his mind and come more our way. Obviously he has done enough to earn Ron's endorsement.

Out of all the 2014 Senate races Broun is our best bet of getting someone in there that will hold the line on spending and not be a sell out, establishment piece of filth. Is he perfect? I doubt it. Hardly anybody is. But he's our best bet at really getting someone who's any good in there in 2014. Apart from NC with Brannon I guess but taking out Hagen will be damn expensive.

Please don't ruin it by pointing out imperfections. It is clear Broun is viable and would be a very good senator. Enough for Ron