Update: Judge tosses case for cop who killed unarmed man In his home

[green73]

This is an update to this thread
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?358685-Police-kill-unarmed-18-year-old-flushing-marijuana-down-toilet


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3G0nEnjMFE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3G0nEnjMFE

via
http://lionsofliberty.com/2013/05/17/felony-friday-police-kill-unarmed-man-in-the-bronx-judge-tosses-indictment/

[Anti Federalist]

Just-Us.

The family will sue in civil court, nail the taxpayers for a couple of million, or their insurers anyways, with no "admission of wrongdoing" by the police, and Officer Friendly will go right on busting heads.

[Weston White]

Why was only one “officer” present at court? Being that is appeared there were at least others involved in that unlawful entry and unjustified homicide incident. They should all be standing side-by-side. You know stand together, and all of that.

That is so ridiculous though; of course he might have been armed, anybody could be armed, but until that is known to be the case, as fact, then there is no justification for lethal force to be used. Regardless, even if he were armed, until he actually commits to brandishing— in a reasonably dangerous manner—or discharging his weapon, still there is no justification for lethal force to be used against that person.

Moreover, if he had brandished or discharged his weapon at the police, the question needs to first be answered, as to if he was legally justified in having done so (e.g., were the police acting against him without law or unlawfully, did have reason to believe his home was being invaded by criminals, etc?)


“If only’s and just’s (including: maybe’s, perhaps, could haves, should haves, and would haves) were candies and nuts, then everyday would be Erntedankfest!” – Assistant to the Regional Manager Dwight K. Schrute, “The Office”

[Dr.3D]

It's good they stopped him from doing that darned Marijuana, it could have ruined his life.

[sailingaway]

Why was only one “officer” present at court? Being that is appeared there were at least others involved in that unlawful entry and unjustified homicide incident. They should all be standing side-by-side. You know stand together, and all of that.

That is so ridiculous though; of course he might have been armed, anybody could be armed, but until that is known to be the case, as fact, then there is no justification for lethal force to be used. Regardless, even if he were armed, until he actually commits to brandishing— in a reasonably dangerous manner—or discharging his weapon, still there is no justification for lethal force to be used against that person.

Moreover, if he had brandished or discharged his weapon at the police, the question needs to first be answered, as to if he was legally justified in having done so (e.g., were the police acting against him without law or unlawfully, did have reason to believe his home was being invaded by criminals, etc?)


“If only’s and just’s (including: maybe’s, perhaps, could haves, should haves, and would haves) were candies and nuts, then everyday would be Erntedankfest!” – Assistant to the Regional Manager Dwight K. Schrute, “The Office”

You are ALLOWED to defend yourself with a gun in your home. It isn't the homeowner who wasn't supposed to be there.

[sailingaway]

Why was only one “officer” present at court? Being that is appeared there were at least others involved in that unlawful entry and unjustified homicide incident. They should all be standing side-by-side. You know stand together, and all of that.

That is so ridiculous though; of course he might have been armed, anybody could be armed, but until that is known to be the case, as fact, then there is no justification for lethal force to be used. Regardless, even if he were armed, until he actually commits to brandishing— in a reasonably dangerous manner—or discharging his weapon, still there is no justification for lethal force to be used against that person.

Moreover, if he had brandished or discharged his weapon at the police, the question needs to first be answered, as to if he was legally justified in having done so (e.g., were the police acting against him without law or unlawfully, did have reason to believe his home was being invaded by criminals, etc?)


“If only’s and just’s (including: maybe’s, perhaps, could haves, should haves, and would haves) were candies and nuts, then everyday would be Erntedankfest!” – Assistant to the Regional Manager Dwight K. Schrute, “The Office”

You are ALLOWED to defend yourself with a gun in your home.

[Yieu]

Yup, it's to the point where they just kill you in your house for no reason, and say everything is okay.