PDA

View Full Version : Who’s Profitting From America’s Empire of Bases?




sailingaway
05-15-2013, 10:58 PM
the countries where our money pours out to like a spigot, instead of returning into our own economy as when our policy was to mostly base our troops at home, the companies like Halliburtin who reincorporate their headquarters overseas to take the money as 'foreign source income' they don't have to pay US tax on, and those we prop up... until we don't...


Every now and then, news about U.S. military bases abroad actually gets a little attention. The most recent example: Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s announcement that the U.S. will be able to keep nine bases after the 2014 withdrawal of its combat troops. (“‘They want nine bases… across the country, in Kabul, Bagram, Mazar, Jalalabad, Gardez, Kandahar, Helmand, Shindand and Herat,’ he told faculty members and students [at Kabul University]. ‘We agree to give the bases. We see their presence after 2014 in Afghanistan as a positive.’”) These aren’t, of course, small bases. Two of them, Bagram and Kandahar, are veritable monsters, and so offer some indication of Washington’s possible plans — evidently still in flux – for keeping U.S. troops, trainers, advisors, special operations forces, CIA types, private security contractors, assorted allied Afghan militias, and whatnot in place once the war is officially “over” and “withdrawal” complete.

Most of the time, though, you have to be a fanatic news jockey to notice pieces about what could be considered the most singular aspect of the American overseas persona: our “empire of bases” (as Chalmers Johnson used to call it). Though base numbers remain staggering and historically unprecedented, most Americans are hardly aware of their existence. So, picking and choosing from the last month of overlooked base news, how many of you noticed that a U.S. KC-135 refueling plane, based at an American “military installation” connected to Manas International Airport near Bishtek, went down over northern Kyrgyzstan? How many of you knew that the U.S. had a military installation in Kyrgyzstan, just a hop, skip, and a jump across Tajikistan from Afghanistan? How many of you can even locate Kyrgyzstan? (I just checked my own atlas to be sure!)

How many of you heard that a U.S. military helicopter, evidently from a U.S. base — one of a number — in South Korea, crashed recently near the North Korean border? Or that the Chinese press is now plugging for the “return” of the Japanese island of Okinawa, with its huge U.S. military complex? How many of you realized that 68 years after the end of World War II, the U.S. still has dozens of bases there and that Okinawans continue to protest the construction of a new base amid the staggering concentration of foreign military installations on their soil?

How many of you noticed that Spain, going through tough economic times and significant defense cutbacks, has upped its basing relationship with the U.S.? According to the Christian Science Monitor, “500 U.S. Marines are in the process of deploying to Morón Air Base in southern Spain as part of a rapid reaction force that will act as the vanguard to protect American interests in the increasingly volatile North African region.” And speaking of Northern Africa, did you notice the report by John Reed at Foreign Policy mapping U.S. installations, especially drone bases, there and elsewhere in Africa, including satellite shots of installations you’ve probably never heard of in places like Arba Minch in Ethiopia, Niamey in Niger, the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean, and Lamu on the Kenyan coast? (Hey, don’t beat up on yourself. We Americans have next to no idea what’s being done in our name globally!)

more: http://original.antiwar.com/engelhardt/2013/05/15/whos-profitting-from-americas-empire-of-bases/

Natural Citizen
05-15-2013, 11:30 PM
Beyond pure profit from the current geopolitical skullduggery in general a great question is how does one define economic occupation once the military occupation is complete? That's the million dollar question.

This is one of the most important topics on this entire board but will probably receive very little interest because of political maneuvering. Is unfortunate. Too often we see extremely important discussion frowned upon because of the old "We don't want to make our favorite politician look bad by bringing up big boy speak" gag. Is a disservice to many who would come here for information relative to this foreign infrastructure and how it affects them down the road given no practical means for general scrutiny.

sailingaway
05-15-2013, 11:38 PM
Beyond pure profit from the current geopolitical skullduggery in general a great question is how does one define economic occupation once the military occupation is complete? That's the million dollar question.

This is one of the most important topics on this entire board but will probably receive very little interest because of political maneuvering. Is unfortunate. Too often we see extremely important discussion frowned upon because of the old "We don't want to make our favorite politician look bad by bringing up big boy speak" gag. Is a disservice to many who would come here for information relative to this foreign infrastructure and how it affects them down the road given no practical means for general scrutiny.

I think you are fine discussing it here, it isn't in a candidate subforum, and doesn't reflect on a candidate, just us, I would think.

J_White
05-15-2013, 11:47 PM
great info.