PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Judges Regularly Falsifying Court Records




better-dead-than-fed
05-06-2013, 12:04 PM
Last Nov-15, I posted a thread (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?395877-Federal-Judge-Glenda-E-Edmonds-Falsifying-Court-Records) about one U.S. judge falsifying court records. The next day I was arrested, and subsequently, another U.S. judge in the same court falsified records in the same fashion as the first judge had. Details, including links to court documents, are here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VFOSg1Xb7kL_ppGYQ97E52keBI11fyLsEtWBH5s9sPM/edit?usp=sharing). It's pasted below, but without the links:

U.S. Judges Regularly Falsifying Court Records

Federal judges in Arizona are imprisoning people without probable cause, and falsifying court records to cover it up. When a person is accused of violating probation, he is entitled to a prompt “preliminary hearing” to determine whether there is probable cause. In practice, judges in Arizona are imprisoning people without holding these hearings.

On 2011-Jul-26, I was charged with violating probation, but I was denied a preliminary hearing. Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds falsified court records to say that I had “waived” the preliminary hearing, but the court transcript shows I did nothing of the sort. The law required the judge to inform me of my right to a preliminary hearing, but the transcript shows she did not inform me. Eventually, I submitted a written request for a preliminary hearing, but the court denied my request without explanation.

On 2012-Nov-20, I was charged with violating probation again. Once again:

• the judge failed to inform me of my right to a preliminary hearing;

• the judge denied me a preliminary hearing;

• the judge falsified court records to say I had “waived” the preliminary hearing;

• I submitted a written request for a preliminary hearing; and

• my request was denied.

I then informed the chief judge:


THE COURT: … It says you waived your right to a preliminary hearing ….

DEFENDANT: … that claim is absolutely false and baseless, hence my need for the transcript. … This is the third time that judges in this court have claimed that I’ve waived a preliminary hearing, and the transcripts are showing nothing of the sort.

A transcript would have shown that I never waived the preliminary hearing. When I ordered a transcript, the court said they could not provide one, due to an “error”.

Czolgosz
05-06-2013, 12:25 PM
I'm not shocked when a crime syndicate commits crime.

HOLLYWOOD
05-06-2013, 01:14 PM
Now you know why the #1 Propaganda Mouthpiece of America stated this past weekend...


President Barack Obama implored the 2013 graduating class of Ohio State University Sunday, to reject the antigovernment conspiracy theories...http://www.ohio.com/news/obama-urges-osu-grads-to-reject-anti-government-talk-1.395335

WhistlinDave
05-06-2013, 01:44 PM
If you can't get them to produce a transcript, have you thought about getting a local investigative-type TV reporter to start looking into this and asking questions? That might get something done... If not, at least it will really piss off the people breaking the law.

better-dead-than-fed
05-07-2013, 12:04 AM
If you can't get them to produce a transcript, have you thought about getting a local investigative-type TV reporter to start looking into this and asking questions? That might get something done... If not, at least it will really piss off the people breaking the law.

Good idea. Meanwhile, if the court documents I'm posting are useful to anyone as evidence, feel free to use them for whatever.

S.Shorland
05-07-2013, 01:34 AM
Can't imagine anything worse for justice than bent judges.What a horrible situation to be in.You have my best wishes.

TonySutton
05-07-2013, 07:10 AM
ACLU

better-dead-than-fed
05-07-2013, 07:28 AM
ACLU

Thanks for suggesting it, but the ACLU ignores my information (http://better-dead-than-fed.tumblr.com/post/28212519416/open-letter-to-the-aclu).

TonySutton
05-07-2013, 07:56 AM
Thanks for suggesting it, but the ACLU ignores my information (http://better-dead-than-fed.tumblr.com/post/28212519416/open-letter-to-the-aclu).

I am not sure a emailing a link to a tumblr web page is the best method of contacting the ACLU when seeking their assistance.

Cleaner44
05-07-2013, 08:04 AM
Maybe you should call a libertarian lawyer. This guy is a Ron Paul supporter and much more.

Marc J. Victor, P.C.
Attorney at Law
3920 South Alma School Road, Suite 5
Chandler, Arizona 85248
http://www.attorneyforfreedom.com/

http://www.kpho.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=7848319

better-dead-than-fed
05-07-2013, 08:22 AM
I am not sure a emailing a link to a tumblr web page is the best method of contacting the ACLU when seeking their assistance.

It might be, when you're court-ordered not to contact the ACLU. I didn't think the ACLU's mission barred evidence presented via Tumblr.

better-dead-than-fed
05-07-2013, 08:25 AM
Maybe you should call a libertarian lawyer. This guy is a Ron Paul supporter and much more.

Marc J. Victor, P.C.
Attorney at Law
3920 South Alma School Road, Suite 5
Chandler, Arizona 85248
http://www.attorneyforfreedom.com/

http://www.kpho.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=7848319

Thank you.

better-dead-than-fed
05-10-2013, 05:24 AM
Thanks for suggesting it, but the ACLU ignores my information (http://better-dead-than-fed.tumblr.com/post/28212519416/open-letter-to-the-aclu).

I am not sure a emailing a link to a tumblr web page is the best method of contacting the ACLU when seeking their assistance.

Or maybe the ACLU has abandoned its mission.


... “There is an unholy alliance between the Obama Department of Justice and leftist organizations such as the ACLU...,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. ...

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?413768-quot-unholy-alliance-quot-between-the-DOJ-and-ACLU

Dianne
05-10-2013, 05:44 AM
There is no justice in the US, unless you are represented by an attorney. Pro se defendants, according to the law, are supposed to receive some leniency since they are not trained in the complex practice of law.

In my county in North Carolina, the pro se litigant is almost always thrown under the bus without serious consideration by the Judge. There is a deepening prejudice against a pro se ligitant, promulgated by the Bar Association who wishes to punish anyone who has the nerve to proceed without paying for the services of an attorney. They have to make an example of you.

The Judges break the law every day, but they would not do so without the blessings and encouragement of the Bar Association.

If I were you, I would file a complaint with the Judicial Standards Commission in your state. They won't do anything about it, they could care less .... but at least you will have it on record.

Motion for a public defender? Motion for judge to recuse? Appeal? I'm certainly not an attorney, so please don't construe any of the above to be legal advice.

tod evans
05-10-2013, 06:16 AM
The term "Just-Us" is used because of the incestuous relationships between members of the legislative/executive and judicial branches..

I've not heard of any way short of large amounts of cash to even dent that clan of inbreeders.

better-dead-than-fed
05-10-2013, 06:38 AM
There is no justice in the US, unless you are represented by an attorney. Pro se defendants, according to the law, are supposed to receive some leniency since they are not trained in the complex practice of law.

In my county in North Carolina, the pro se litigant is almost always thrown under the bus without serious consideration by the Judge. There is a deepening prejudice against a pro se ligitant, promulgated by the Bar Association who wishes to punish anyone who has the nerve to proceed without paying for the services of an attorney. They have to make an example of you.

The Judges break the law every day, but they would not do so without the blessings and encouragement of the Bar Association.

If I were you, I would file a complaint with the Judicial Standards Commission in your state. They won't do anything about it, they could care less .... but at least you will have it on record.

Motion for a public defender? Motion for judge to recuse? Appeal? I'm certainly not an attorney, so please don't construe any of the above to be legal advice.

I'm no longer in prison, so it's too late for a remedy. If there were any way to deter judges from continuing this particular offense against other defendants, that would be nice, but I'm not counting on that. I haven't bothered to file a judicial complaint with the Ninth Circuit.

I have seen that the Arizona State Bar and virtually every defense attorney in Tucson bless and encourage judges to violate defendants' rights. The scheme is: attorneys refuse to raise objections against judges' misconduct, the State Bar refuses to investigate complaints about the attorneys, and the judges similarly refuse to discipline the lawyers. I've posted letters from the State Bar (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d7wcL3vj-_033bOilZvCkGJf0Gil37WHe-8tjNlCYDA/edit?usp=sharing), saying they refuse to investigate my complaints, saying it's up to the judge to discipline the lawyers. As if a judge is going to discipline an attorney for failing to object to the judge's misconduct.

I did move for the judge to recuse. Motion for Change of Judge (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5ZYXb_HdIQhSVZBUWtGS1dTRFE/edit?usp=sharing) and Affidavit of Bias and Prejudice Disqualifying Judge (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5ZYXb_HdIQhRXpGWC1pU1hHcjg/edit?usp=sharing). He refused (another violation of law). Transcript (https://docs.google.com/file/d/1tiiDIUj8FYPnoXBd3zccTXw9--P4yaECGcKyLmHUz1-Gnp8xL_wH1TQoy-lh/edit?usp=sharing), pages 93 - 95:


DEFENDANT: I had moved for your replacement with a different judge.

THE COURT: I didn't see that one. Which one was that?

DEFENDANT ... Docket 291 and 292. ... Well, you denied it, Docket 320.

THE COURT: So you're renewing those two, is that what you're saying, if I've already denied them in Docket No. 320?

DEFENDANT: What I'm saying is, you had no discretion to deny those, and unless -- according to the law. The law leaves you no discretion. "You shall." You know, it's stated like that. And if you'd like to voluntarily comply with the law, you'll save us both a trip to the appeals court....

THE COURT: I still reject those two documents. The motion is denied.

A month later, I tried again. Transcript (https://docs.google.com/file/d/17rckw9FVDcUPumXSAn-stLOGHfhRJtYVbNhneddhOZCEp4cTr2NngxYJy0LU/edit?usp=sharing), pages 5 - 6:


THE COURT: it looks like 421 is your Motion for Recusal that you filed on February the 5th. ... Did you cite new grounds on the motion?

DEFENDANT: I did. This is new grounds.

THE COURT: ... All right. Motion is denied. What's the next motion?

I did better pro se than with lawyers (even a paid lawyer). When I was pro se, I only had the judge and U.S. Attorney working against me; that was better than having a defense attorney working against me while pretending to represent my interests.