PDA

View Full Version : Millions in CIA 'ghost money' paid to Afghan president’s office (NYT writer)




torchbearer
04-29-2013, 06:54 PM
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/cia-funnels-millions-to-afghan-president-karzais-office/article11603848/

MATTHEW ROSENBERG
Kabul — The New York Times News Service
Published Monday, Apr. 29 2013, 12:21 AM EDT
Last updated Monday, Apr. 29 2013, 2:31 AM ED


For more than a decade, wads of U.S. dollars packed into suitcases, backpacks and, on occasion, plastic shopping bags have been dropped off every month or so at the offices of Afghanistan’s president – courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency.
All told, tens of millions of dollars have flowed from the CIA to the office of President Hamid Karzai, according to current and former advisers to the Afghan leader.


“We called it ‘ghost money,”’ said Khalil Roman, who served as Karzai’s chief of staff from 2002 until 2005. “It came in secret, and it left in secret.”
The CIA, which declined to comment for this article, has long been known to support some relatives and close aides of Karzai. But the new accounts of off-the-books cash delivered directly to his office show payments on a vaster scale, and with a far greater impact on everyday governing.
Moreover, there is little evidence that the payments bought the influence the CIA sought. Instead, some U.S. officials said, the cash has fueled corruption and empowered warlords, undermining Washington’s exit strategy from Afghanistan.


“The biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan,” one U.S. official said, “was the United States.”


The United States was not alone in delivering cash to the president. Karzai acknowledged a few years ago that Iran regularly gave bags of cash to one of his top aides.


At the time, in 2010, U.S. officials jumped on the payments as evidence of an aggressive Iranian campaign to buy influence and poison Afghanistan’s relations with the United States. What they did not say was that the CIA was also plying the presidential palace with cash – and unlike the Iranians, it still is.


U.S. and Afghan officials familiar with the payments said the agency’s main goal in providing the cash has been to maintain access to Karzai and his inner circle and to guarantee the agency’s influence at the presidential palace, which wields tremendous power in Afghanistan’s highly centralized government. The officials spoke about the money only on the condition of anonymity.


It is not clear that the United States is getting what it pays for. Karzai’s willingness to defy the United States – and the Iranians, for that matter – on an array of issues seems to have only grown as the cash has piled up. Instead of securing his good graces, the payments may well illustrate the opposite: Karzai is seemingly unable to be bought.


Over Iran’s objections, he signed a strategic partnership deal with the United States last year, directly leading the Iranians to halt their payments, two senior Afghan officials said. Now, Karzai is seeking control over the Afghan militias raised by the CIA to target operatives of al-Qaeda and insurgent commanders, potentially upending a critical part of the Obama administration’s plans for fighting militants as conventional military forces pull back this year.


But the CIA has continued to pay, believing it needs Karzai’s ear to run its clandestine war against al-Qaeda and its allies, according to U.S. and Afghan officials.


Like the Iranian cash, much of the CIA’s money goes to paying off warlords and politicians, many of whom have ties to the drug trade and, in some cases, the Taliban. The result, U.S. and Afghan officials said, is that the agency has greased the wheels of the same patronage networks that U.S. diplomats and law enforcement agents have struggled unsuccessfully to dismantle, leaving the government in the grips of what are basically organized crime syndicates.


The cash does not appear to be subject to the oversight and restrictions placed on official U.S. aid to the country or even the CIA’s formal assistance programs, like financing Afghan intelligence agencies. And while there is no evidence that Karzai has personally taken any of the money – Afghan officials say the cash is handled by his National Security Council – the payments do in some cases work directly at odds with the aims of other parts of the U.S. government in Afghanistan, even if they do not appear to violate U.S. law.


Handing out cash has been standard procedure for the CIA in Afghanistan since the start of the war. During the 2001 invasion, agency cash bought the services of numerous warlords, including Muhammad Qasim Fahim, the current first vice-president.

“We paid them to overthrow the Taliban,” the U.S. official said.


The CIA then kept paying the Afghans to keep fighting. For instance, Karzai’s half brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, was paid by the CIA to run the Kandahar Strike Force, a militia used by the agency to combat militants, until his assassination in 2011.


A number of senior officials on the Afghan National Security Council are also individually on the agency’s payroll, Afghan officials said.

While intelligence agencies often pay foreign officials to provide information, dropping off bags of cash at a foreign leader’s office to curry favour is a more unusual arrangement.


Afghan officials said the practice grew out of the unique circumstances in Afghanistan, where the United States built the government that Karzai runs. To accomplish that task, it had to bring to heel many of the warlords the CIA had paid during and after the 2001 invasion.

By late 2002, Karzai and his aides were pressing for the payments to be routed through the president’s office, allowing him to buy the warlords’ loyalty, a former adviser to Karzai said.


Then, in December 2002, Iranians showed up at the palace in a sport utility vehicle packed with cash, the former adviser said.
The CIA began dropping off cash at the palace the following month, and the sums grew from there, Afghan officials said.


Payments ordinarily range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, the officials said, though none could provide exact figures. The money is used to cover a slew of off-the-books expenses, like paying off lawmakers or underwriting delicate diplomatic trips or informal negotiations.


Much of it also still goes to keeping old warlords in line. One is Abdul Rashid Dostum, an ethnic Uzbek whose militia served as a CIA proxy force in 2001. He receives nearly $100,000 a month from the palace, two Afghan officials said. Other officials said the amount was significantly lower.


Dostum, who declined requests for comment, had previously said he was given $80,000 a month to serve as Karzai’s emissary in northern Afghanistan. “I asked for a year upfront in cash so that I could build my dream house,” he was quoted as saying in a 2009 interview with Time magazine.


Some of the cash also probably ends up in the pockets of the Karzai aides who handle it, Afghan and Western officials said, though they would not identify any by name.


That is not a significant concern for the CIA, said U.S. officials familiar with the agency’s operations. “They’ll work with criminals if they think they have to,” one American former official said.


Interestingly, the cash from Tehran appears to have been handled with greater transparency than the dollars from the CIA, Afghan officials said. The Iranian payments were routed through Karzai’s chief of staff. Some of the money was deposited in an account in the president’s name at a state-run bank, and some was kept at the palace. The sum delivered would then be announced at the next Cabinet meeting. The Iranians gave $3-million to well over $10-million a year, they said.


When word of the Iranian cash leaked out in October 2010, Karzai told reporters that he was grateful for it. He then added: “The United States is doing the same thing. They are providing cash to some of our offices.”


At the time, Karzai’s aides said he was referring to the billions in formal aid the United States gives. But the former adviser said in a recent interview that the president was in fact referring to the CIA’s bags of cash.


No one mentions the agency’s money at cabinet meetings. It is handled by a small clique at the National Security Council, including its administrative chief, Mohammed Zia Salehi, Afghan officials said.


Salehi, though, is better known for being arrested in 2010 in connection with a sprawling, American-led investigation that tied together Afghan cash smuggling, Taliban finances and the opium trade. Karzai had him released within hours, and the CIA then helped persuade the Obama administration to back off its anti-corruption push, U.S. officials said.


After his release, Salehi jokingly came up with a motto that succinctly summed up the United States’ conflicting priorities. He was, he began telling colleagues, “an enemy of the FBI, and a hero to the CIA.”

torchbearer
04-29-2013, 06:55 PM
about the author:
Matthew Rosenberg is a foreign correspondent for The New York Times who covers Afghanistan.


Since joining The Times in 2011, Mr. Rosenberg’s stories have included one of the few detailed accounts of an attack by Afghan soldiers on their American allies, and a look at how Iran has skirted American-imposed sanctions by buying up dollars in Afghanistan, which is awash in hard currency after a decade of massive American cash infusions. He also covered Afghanistan’s first international boxing match, which he christened the Squabble in Kabul.


In between trips to the front lines and stints in the press boxes of Afghan sporting events, Mr. Rosenberg also managed to slip in a fly fishing trip to the Panjshir Valley, north of Kabul. There, he was thoroughly outdone by Afghan kids who used bamboo sticks for poles. They hooked fish after fish. Mr. Rosenberg, with his pricey fly fishing gear, caught nothing.


Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Rosenberg was a correspondent for The Wall Street Journal. While at The Journal, he interviewed Sirajuddin Haqqani, the leader of what is considered one of Afghanistan’s most potent insurgent factions, and uncovered the massive amount of cash that flows daily through Kabul’s airport, prompting the temporary suspension of $3.9 billion in American aid to Afghanistan. He also was part of the Journal team that covered the 2008 attack on Mumbai.


Mr. Rosenberg got his start as a news clerk at The New York Times before moving on to The Associated Press, where he reported from South Asia, the Middle East, East Africa and the Caribbean.


Mr. Rosenberg was born in New York and graduated from McGill University in Montreal. He currently splits his time between Kabul and Washington.

sailingaway
04-29-2013, 07:02 PM
So, is this money appropriated by Congress, or is the CIA running drugs for it?

torchbearer
04-29-2013, 07:05 PM
So, is this money appropriated by Congress, or is the CIA running drugs for it? not sure, but what is certain is there is no accountability for it afterwards. they probably throw around billions, doing this kind of crap all over the world. buying opec reps, arming rebel groups, etc- all without oversight or congressional approval.
the CIA has been funding the taliban. to buy them off, only to have that money used to buy arms that kill our troops.

torchbearer
04-29-2013, 08:25 PM
old news?

kcchiefs6465
04-29-2013, 08:29 PM
old news?
I don't believe so. There is another thread on it I think.

It's a damn shame.

jmdrake
04-29-2013, 08:30 PM
not sure, but what is certain is there is no accountability for it afterwards. they probably throw around billions, doing this kind of crap all over the world. buying opec reps, arming rebel groups, etc- all without oversight or congressional approval.
the CIA has been funding the taliban. to buy them off, only to have that money used to buy arms that kill our troops.

We have found the enemy, and he is us.


old news?

This was posted in another thread. New news to most outside our circle I'm sure.

torchbearer
04-29-2013, 08:56 PM
this is the kind of info, from a known source, that could wake some people up.

kcchiefs6465
04-29-2013, 09:04 PM
this is the kind of info, from a known source, that could wake some people up.
Yes it would. I hope people tweet or 'like' this article to get people talking.

It's unacceptable but has been going on for so long that people are either used to it, or have no idea where said country is on a map. Hollywood posted a video that was pretty bad. I originally stated that probably less than 1 in 10 people know who the president of Afghanistan is, I'd go even lower. It's ridiculous.