PDA

View Full Version : Court seizes legal defense fund of activist who told Greenwald didn't want to b informant




sailingaway
04-18-2013, 07:11 PM
this is a blog, but it is quoting stuff that looks persuasive to me:


Court seizes Barrett Brown's defense fund
http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/wm3ytZEgBfc/mqdefault.jpg

Supporters of Barrett Brown, a journalist and independent researcher facing decades in prison, raised $20k for his legal defense. Yesterday, a northern Texas District Court moved to take those funds and place them into the court registry no later than April 30, 2013, “while the Court has hearings and makes a determination as to what, if anything should be done in utilizing the funds towards the repayment of costs for Defendant’s court appointed representation.”


It is further ORDERED, the funds currently in the account identified...will not be encumbered, assigned or disposed of by anyone who has access to this account. Once the funds are placed in the registry of this Court, the funds shall not be disbursed without an order of this Court.

In other words, without saying why, the court has frozen Brown’s legal defense fund, and may or may not allow him to use it to pay his attorneys.

Back in March, the Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald wrote about Brown’s case and urged people to make contributions to his defense fund.


If the US government is going to attempt to imprison activists and journalists like this, it should at the very least be a fair fight. That means that Brown, who is now represented by a public defender, should have a vigorous defense able to devote the time and energy to his case that it deserves. He told me in the telephone interview we had that he believes this is the key to enabling him to avoid pleading guilty and agreeing to a prison term: something he has thus far refused to do in part because he insists he did nothing criminal, and in part because he refuses to become a government informant.

It appears as if the government is not fond of that strategy.

Per wikipedia:


Barrett Brown
Writer
Barrett Brown is a writer who has given numerous media interviews on the internet group, Anonymous. While Brown does not claim to be a spokesperson for Anonymous, the media often represents him that way.

Maybe there is some legitimate reason to seize a legal defense fund, but I don't think I've heard of one.

better-dead-than-fed
04-18-2013, 07:38 PM
The pertinent court-order is here (http://cryptome.org/2013/04/brown-050.pdf). Brown is represented by a government-paid attorney pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (18 USC 3006A) (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3006A), wherein paragraph f provides:


Whenever the United States magistrate judge or the court finds that funds are available for payment from or on behalf of a person furnished representation, it may authorize or direct that such funds be paid to the appointed attorney, to the bar association or legal aid agency or community defender organization which provided the appointed attorney, to any person or organization authorized pursuant to subsection (e) to render investigative, expert, or other services, or to the court for deposit in the Treasury as a reimbursement to the appropriation, current at the time of payment, to carry out the provisions of this section. ...

The thing is, the seized funds here don't even belong to Brown. "Free Barrett Brown Ltd., including the legal defense fund is an independent non-profit organization with its own accounts." (https://twitter.com/FreeBarrett_/status/324996357494558720)

There's also a question as to what Process is Due before a court can make such a finding. It's clear that Free Barrett Brown Ltd. wasn't even given notice or an opportunity to be heard in court before its property was stolen by the government.

HOLLYWOOD
04-18-2013, 07:52 PM
Government theft again...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJGthEmPO9E

jkr
04-18-2013, 08:01 PM
U
GOT
RObbED
!!!