NPR: Will The Future GOP Be More Libertarian? [Archive]

HOLLYWOOD

04-09-2013, 11:57 PM

think so? Criminals and Neocons are still deeply embedded in the GOP.

Cheney Meets With House Republican Leaders on Korea
http://www.rollcall.com/news/cheney_meets_with_house_republican_leaders_on_kore a-223855-1.html?pos=hln

By Daniel Newhauser (http://www.rollcall.com/reporters/18.html)
Roll Call Staff
April 9, 2013, 6:15 p.m.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney told members of House Republican leadership Tuesday to be wary of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in the escalating situation in the Korean Peninsula.
Cheney attended a leadership meeting in the office of Speaker John A. Boehner (http://www.rollcall.com/members/379.html) of Ohio before walking to the office of Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (http://www.rollcall.com/members/25162.html) of California to speak with the GOP whip team. He came at the behest of McCarthy, according to aides and members.
Cheney declined to say what he told the members, saying it was a private meeting. “I’m concerned about it, of course, like I’m sure everyone is,” he said.
Rep. Steve Southerland II (http://www.rollcall.com/members/32344.html), R-Fla., said Cheney warned members not to underestimate the 26-year-old North Korean leader.
“He could have a lot of things up his sleeve, not just military power,” Southerland said. Cheney “emphasized the fact that this is a guy you cannot underestimate . . . because we don’t know anything about him. Our intel on him is sketchy at best. He’s young, so he doesn’t have a track record, and don’t eliminate any possibility of what his intentions are: blackmail, actual use of force or using it as a chip.
“How we handle the North Koreans is on display, so we need to be careful. What we’re doing here is being watched,” Cheney said, according to Southerland. “So he said, ‘You need to make sure you’re setting a precedent,’” Southerland said.

[B]Dick Cheney offers the GOP familiar advice on spending(SPEND MORE on MILITARY)
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-07-17/opinions/35486783_1_fiscal-cliff-house-republicans-tax-cuts
Dick Cheney has not had a change of heart.

The former vice president, the reinvigorated new owner of a transplanted ticker (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cheney-helped-for-many-months-by-a-mechanical-heart-is-terrific-after-transplant/2012/03/25/gIQAfy1eaS_story.html), went to Capitol Hill on Tuesday (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/dick-cheney-house-gop-to-talk-about-sequester/2012/07/16/gJQApPUmpW_blog.html) to advise Republicans on budget strategy as Washington heads for the “fiscal cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/democrats-threaten-gop-with-fiscal-cliff-as-tax-fight-rages-on/2012/07/15/gJQAvybLnW_story.html).” And Cheney’s message hadn’t changed a bit since the days, early in the George W. Bush administration, when he told the Treasury secretary not to worry about deficits.
Cheney (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/cheney/), said lawmakers in the closed-door meetings, urged Republicans to continue high levels of military spending, warning them to resist automatic cuts that were put in place in last summer’s bipartisan budget deal. He offered not a word about how to fix the enormous budget deficits and soaring federal debt.

“The vice president talked only about the pros of appropriate investments in defense,” reported Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who worried that lawmakers might respond to such advice by abandoning attempts to restrain spending.
In that sense, the Republicans’ invitation to Cheney was worrying. In office, he championed policies — huge tax cuts, fighting two wars on credit and expanding Medicare benefits — that created much of today’s fiscal mess. Three years later, as the consequences of such policies have become clear, he is essentially advising the GOP on the same course.
Seeking Cheney’s advice on budget discipline was a curious choice for congressional Republicans. One wonders whether they will next seek lectures from Scooter Libby on grand jury procedure, Paul Wolfowitz on non-violence or Donald Rumsfeld on charm.
Cheney’s hosts kept his visit quiet, scheduling no public events and having the former vice president escorted through the halls by a protective Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.). Cheney, stooped and thin but looking stronger than before the transplant, refused to answer reporters’ questions as he walked through the corridors, although I provoked a crooked smile when I asked, after his meeting with Republican senators, whether he had “set them straight.”

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/images/pixel.gif
Said Cheney: “I’m just here to see old friends.” Those old friends included the entire Senate GOP caucus, House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and other House leaders. Politico quoted an unnamed Republican saying that Cheney’s visit was meant to get lawmakers “ginned up (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78569.html)” about avoiding defense cuts.
That Cheney would be the man to get Republicans ginned up is appropriate, because he and his Bush administration colleagues spent money (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/) like drunken sailors during their eight years in office. When then-Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill counseled against further tax cuts because of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the war in Afghanistan, Cheney informed him that “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter (http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18560_162-592330.html),” according to O’Neill’s telling.
Cheney continued to champion spending late in the Bush administration, urging skeptical House Republicans (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13789.html) to support Bush’s plan to bail out Wall Street. He returned later in 2008 in an unsuccessful effort to persuade Republicans to back a bailout of Detroit (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OurWorldView/message/7360), warning lawmakers that “if we don’t do this, we will be known as the party of Herbert Hoover forever.”
The lavish deficit spending that Cheney championed accelerated under President Obama, and both sides accepted last year that something had to be done, even if they couldn’t agree on the particulars. So they punted the decisions to a “supercommittee” and, in case that failed, set up automatic “sequestration” — severe spending cuts set to take place at the end of the year that many warn could throw the economy back into recession.
The supercommittee failed when Republicans refused to budge on tax increases. And now Democrats are attempting to be equally intransigent. Sen. Patty Murray (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/think-tanked/post/fiscal-cliff-tax-reform-cannot-be-backdoor-for-gop-to-sneak-through-cuts-for-the-rich-says-murray/2012/07/17/gJQAH6YJrW_blog.html) (D-Wash.), a co-chair of the supercommittee, suggested Monday that Democrats would let the Bush tax cuts expire, and the scheduled spending cuts occur, if Republicans don’t yield on raising taxes on the rich. “If we can’t get a good deal (http://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/newsreleases?ID=2ee55401-895d-43e1-95f8-9e694172b54e), a balanced deal that calls on the wealthy to pay their fair share, then I will absolutely continue this debate into 2013,” she said.

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/images/pixel.gif
And with both sides dug in, the Republicans’ decision to summon Cheney raises the specter that they’ll do as he says — call off the automatic spending cuts — without agreeing on a plan for deficit reduction.
“The vice president was very eloquent,” Corker told reporters. “But the last thing as a nation we need to do is put off dealing with this fiscal issue.” Although Cheney didn’t propose ignoring the problem, “with many of these presentations, I worry about something beginning to develop where people say we really should just kick the can down the road and not d