View Full Version : FAA puts no-fly zone over Arkansas oil spill with Exxon employee in charge

04-05-2013, 10:31 AM
Censorship? nah! :rolleyes:

video at link.

The FAA announced a temporary no-fly zone would be enacted indefinitely over the Arkansas oil spill. With word that an Exxon employee was controlling the airspace, though, speculation pointed to the idea the oil company was trying to keep the media away.

The Federal Aviation Administration announced Monday that until further notice, no aircraft will be allowed to operate over the Mayflower oil spill in Conway, Arkansas. While there was scant explanation for the mandate, it was “effective immediately” - and ordered to stay in place “until further notice.”

The FAA's online posting raised some questions Wednesday, though, by noting that “only relief aircraft operations under direction of Tom Suhrhoff” are permitted in the area. On his LinkedIn profile, Suhrhoff lists himself not as an emergency expert or safety official, but as an aviation adviser for ExxonMobil. Prior to ExxonMobil, according to his profile on the professional social network, he worked as a US Army pilot for 24 years.

Cont: http://rt.com/usa/faa-zone-exxon-employee-306/


04-05-2013, 11:04 AM
What's good for the corporation outweighs all other rights. Corporatism 101.

Anti Federalist
04-05-2013, 11:59 AM
Not a day in AmeriKa without a good lockdown.

Matt Collins
04-05-2013, 12:11 PM
This is where civilian drones come into play. A $1000 drone could be sent up to get this video and the FAA couldn't do anything about it.

04-05-2013, 12:11 PM
Got private drone?

04-05-2013, 12:12 PM
Jinx! Owe me a Coke, Matt!

Matt Collins
04-05-2013, 12:23 PM
Got private drone?


04-05-2013, 03:57 PM
What's good for the corporation outweighs all other rights. Corporatism 101.Let's go back in time, where much of this Fascist garbage were put into overdrive.

The United States Isn't a Country
— It's a Corporation!
by Lisa Guliani

...The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

http://i530.photobucket.com/albums/dd341/BushMonkey2008/fascism-politics-congress-obama-president-fascist-marxist-ta-demotivational-poster-1239517132.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=mussolini+bush+fascist&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=oc4IeAv0ZsXFhM&tbnid=ggZGKA0GRDWMHM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mmorpg.com%2Fdiscussion2.cfm% 2Fpost%2F3954004&ei=0kFfUb2UHq_1iQKXkYDADg&bvm=bv.44770516,d.cGE&psig=AFQjCNHjUYjQPl5WxAAB8zs0uKAAo2rx_A&ust=1365274124543331)

04-05-2013, 04:19 PM
Just when I thought there was no such thing as a left wing extremist, this video shows up.

04-06-2013, 11:33 AM
The public has been duped on this pipeline. It's purpose is to export oil, not use it in the US.